painted wolf
Grey Muzzle
Source? Quoting without giving a source is a no-no.pc pp. 9-10 pars. 3-4 "Evolutionists acknowledge that the probability of the right atoms and molecules falling into place to form just one simple protein molecule is about 1 in 10113, or 1 followed by 113 zeros. In other words, it could take 10113 chances for the event to occur once. But any event that has one chance in 1050 is dismissed by mathematicians as never happening.
4However, far more than one simple protein molecule is needed for life to occur. For a cell to maintain its functions, some 2,000 different proteins are needed. What, then, is the probability of all of these happening at random? It is estimated that it is 1 in 1040,000, or 1 followed by 40,000 zeros! Are you willing to rest your faith on such an outrageously remote probability?"
Basic chemistry? I don't think so.
The first big flaw of your source is that no one suggests that a large modern protein just popped into existence randomly.
The second big flaw is that we have these basic structures forming spontaneously in the lab and self replicating... How Did Life Begin? RNA That Replicates Itself Indefinitely Developed For First Time
Thanks to basic chemistry.
Just a little on why your source is mistaken about math.
Good Math/Bad Math: Studying Bad Probability: the Creation Science Research Center
Are the Odds Against the Origin of Life Too Great to Accept? (Addendum B to Review of David Foster's The Philosophical Scientists)
wa:do
ps... I had no idea that my bad eyes were death. It says the wages of sin is death... no that the wages of sin is poor eyesight.