samtonga43
Well-Known Member
Exactly. So when you said, "It (the thread) is about the POA", you were mistaken. You got there at last!It is PoE, not POA.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Exactly. So when you said, "It (the thread) is about the POA", you were mistaken. You got there at last!It is PoE, not POA.
I must have made a typo, I make lots of those.Exactly. So when you said, "It (the thread) is about the POA", you were mistaken. You got there at last!
I must have made a typo, I make lots of those.
I don't have time to go back and reread posts. I admitted I made a mistake, why isn't that enough?Oh yes, we know this. However, one would expect you would realize your error after re-reading.
God is not a human so God does not need a brain in order to have a mind. God’s Mind is unlike a human mind.
You said you had read it twice. Make up your mind.I don't have time to go back and reread posts.
Why are you bringing that here? I was intending to get back to your posts as soon as I had time. I saved all four Alerts in a Word document so I would not forget.Bahaullah said that he WAS God, as I showed you in another thread.
I did read it twice, but I did not catch it THEN. That was then and now is now. Today I said "I don't have time to go back and reread posts" and I was referring to not having time TODAY. But I just went back and corrected where I said POA instead of PoE in two places. Funny thing, it was not even noticed by the person I posted it to as I am sure he knew what I meant IN CONTEXT.You said you had read it twice. Make up your mind.
Actually I did catch it as my own error, and pointed out how it stands as evidence you don't really read what I write. As does this.Funny thing, it was not even noticed by the person I posted it to as I am sure he knew what I meant IN CONTEXT.
Correction: That should have been abbreviated POE. But hey, that stands as moderate evidence that you're not really reading, as it's an easy mistake to really catch, yet you repeat it further down.
I do not always read everything you write, only what I intend to respond to. If it is something that I have heard before and/or something I am not interested in I skim over it... Want to put me in RF jail?Actually I did catch it as my own error, and pointed out how it stands as evidence you don't really read what I write. As does this.
No, your admission of poor form and careless reading is enough, thanks.I do not always read everything you write, only what I intend to respond to. If it is something that I have heard before and/or something I am not interested in I skim over it... Want to put me in RF jail?
Baha'u'llah never said He was God.
Those are not from any official translations of the Writings of Baha'u'llah."There is no God but me the lonely, the imprisoned." (Baha’u’llah, Athar-i Qalam-i A`la, vol. 1, no. 39, p. 226.)
"All Gods became Gods from the flow of my affairs and all Lords became Lords by the overflowing of my decree” (Abdu’l-Baha, Makatib , vol. 2, p. 255 [citing Baha'u'llah])
I have no problem admitting I made a mistake because I have no false pride.No, your admission of poor form and careless reading is enough, thanks.
Both of them are in the Baha'i Online Library, compiled by a Baha'i historian named Dr. Ahang Rabbani. That's pretty official.Those are not from any official translations of the Writings of Baha'u'llah.
No, it is not official at all. All the official Baha'i Writings are in one place here:Both of them are in the Baha'i Online Library, compiled by a Baha'i historian named Dr. Ahang Rabbani. That's pretty official.
I never accused you of anything, I only ever said I consider you childish. Anyone who expects the Almighty God who is the Creator of the entire universe to hop to and do it their way instead of His way I consider childish.And you might want to take your own proselytizing to heart, as you have accused us all of faults many times.
Do you know what the Athar-i-Qalam-i-A'la are? They are letters written by Baha'u'llah. In other words: right from the source.No, it is not official at all.
Oh, not only that. There's also your obsession with crying fallacies, despite evidence showing quite the opposite.I never accused you of anything, I only ever said I consider you childish.
An adult would realize that some things warrant not saying. Just letting go. Especially because it's in the site rules. However, it stands to state again that I expect no such thing of your god, and we're discussing a theological problem. Any "expectations" are entirely within the confines of this theological issue. Now, are you going to learn and apply this too, or ignore like before?Anyone who expects the Almighty God who is the Creator of the entire universe to hop to and do it their way instead of His way I consider childish.
Giving absolutely irrelevant quotes from your scripture to "get one over" on me are. Once more and I'm just going to start reporting it; enough is enough.I will defend my religion when it is attacked and that is not proselytizing,
Sorry but no. Do you believe everything that is posted on the internet?Do you know what the Athar-i-Qalam-i-A'la are? They are letters written by Baha'u'llah. In other words: right from the source.
Go ahead and report it, but you'll also have to report all the Christians who quote from the Bible.Giving absolutely irrelevant quotes from your scripture to "get one over" on me are. Once more and I'm just going to start reporting it; enough is enough.
Not sorry, but yes. As maintained and given by a prolific Baha'i historian and translator, Dr. Ahang Rabbani (as given to you), kept in the Iran National Baha'i Archives. Yet again, the evidence - the facts - are right there in front of you, and you blithely deny them because they challenge your beliefs.Sorry but no. Do you believe everything that is posted on the internet?
Good; the repetition was getting tiresome.I am not reading any more of your criticisms because I don't have to.
You assume that I won't.Go ahead and report it, but you'll also have to report all the Christians who quote from the Bible.
Some verse about the writings being all you need in relation to my statement on your admission of inaccuracy is not relevant. Learn from this and take it forward.My quotes are not irrelevant, they are very much related to what was in your posts to me.
Those are not from any official translations of the Writings of Baha'u'llah.