Just like I 'caught' Dr."Eve gene" making the same erroneous claims he did here on another forum 3 months ago - and having them demolished there, too, I see no reason to expect this one to be any 'better' of a person.[/QUOTE]
Demolished ? Lets see. The quotation from the teacher publication was accurate. If the date was wrong, it was my error. I checked the authors as NE creationists, and missed one as an OE creationist, my error.
Your harping about the zone is bizarre, I never mentioned him, nor was I referring to him. You assumed, took the hook in your mouth, and ran with it. You then manufactured a set of accusations from your assumption and proudly pimped them. Poor form ´ol boy. I was speaking of the fellow who has a happy little bear as his avatar, and I believe he is an American living in Mexico. You ought to be able to find him without using your imagination, if you choose.
The statements re the textbooks stands. Abiogenesis is stated as the logical and most likely process from which life emerged. It was taught as such when I was in high school and college, a long time ago, nothing has changed, except abiogenesis has by necessity become more difficult than it was then, e.g. DNA information. It hasn´t dampened the enthusiasm for it in the textbooks however.
So, keep patting yourselves on the back, mutual admiration in a tribe is expected.
Ah, so a creationist is not a good person, i.e. "any better of a person." Wow ! Atheist morality in action, I am truly impressed ! I am not so arrogant as to look at your manufactured case of deception and decide what kind of person you are based upon this bit of attempted character assassination.
