I more or less have overcome years of Schizophrenia.
Most of us have issues of some type. Its ok.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I more or less have overcome years of Schizophrenia.
Most of us have issues of some type. Its ok.
That’s a common misunderstanding (and often intentional misinterpretation) and in hindsight, Pride might not have been the best choice of name for the events. It came about based on the previous established social principle that homosexuals should feel shame for what and who they were and the literal opposite of shame would be pride. In practice though, it’s about that middle ground of neither shame or pride, just being.It always seemed odd to me to take pride in something you haven't actually accomplished. Sexual orientation isn't an achievement, any more than left handedness or blue eyes.
I can appreciate such parades as celebrations, perhaps, but I wouldn't take any personal pride in my orientation, race or nationality.
The point of gay "pride" events is to show they have nothing to be ashamed of, to overcome stigma. It's not about being proud of being gay, per se.It always seemed odd to me to take pride in something you haven't actually accomplished. Sexual orientation isn't an achievement, any more than left handedness or blue eyes.
I can appreciate such parades as celebrations, perhaps, but I wouldn't take any personal pride in my orientation, race or nationality.
But that's just me.
Milo Yiannopoulos named marshal for 'Straight Pride' parade
Maybe the straight pride parade will be gay enough now?
Understood, and I agree with the sentiment. I've marched in pride parades with gay friends myself. But, as HonestJoe pointed out, "pride" isn't the best term for the movement. IMHO, pride is more than a lack of shame. It should be reserved for achievements.The point of gay "pride" events is to show they have nothing to be ashamed of, to overcome stigma. It's not about being proud of being gay, per se.
Well the thing is, "the straight community" already have the rights that gay people had/have to fight tooth and nail for. That might be the difference.My point is that if the Gay community wants their rights, then the same counts for the straight community too. But there will not be peace between those groups as long as someone makes fun of the other groups. why not try to work together to celebrate being a human being, instead of pulling the sexuality on to the streets? Just be a human being, that is enough
I said it wasn’t the best choice in hindsight. It is the commonly recognised name for this kind of event now and the purpose is perfectly understandable by anyone who doesn’t want to wilfully misrepresent it. I don’t think the effort they’d have to put in to agree on and establish a new name for the events would be worth it. It isn’t going to change anyone’s attitude and would only serve as ammunition for those who would misrepresent the meaning in the first place.Understood, and I agree with the sentiment. I've marched in pride parades with gay friends myself. But, as HonestJoe pointed out, "pride" isn't the best term for the movement. IMHO, pride is more than a lack of shame. It should be reserved for achievements.
Please clarify this statement. Are you saying that gay people behave "unnaturally"?I don't mean this as an attack on the Gay community, but if they had acted more natural
I saw the same thing in your reply, my friend. Determining that 1 form of physical affection between adults is natural, and another form of physical affection is unnatural specifically based on venue is an attachment.Not unnatural, but maybe some, not all do act a little over the top to get attention. But i do not judge them, i only asked a question, but now it look like you turning against me because i dare to seak and ask questions
You're basically asking in a way that blames the victim. It doesn't matter how they act, being gay is enough to be "unnatural" and deserving of violence in the eyes of some, put to death according to some. But it wouldn't have happened if they just acted as I expected them to, just as I beat my wife because she doesn't behave and I raped that girl because she asked for it the way she was dressed.Not unnatural, but maybe some, not all do act a little over the top to get attention. But I do not judge them, I only asked a question, but now it looks like you turning against me because I dare to speak and ask questions
No one was attacking you personally, all I wanted is to clarify what you meant.I have deleted all my previous posts in this treated. because it turned in to an attack of my personally, and that will not benefit this thread.
I understand even i am not against Gay people, there will not be a rightful discussion
I am trully sorry if i offended any of your guys, that was not my intention.
It would have been better to delete them because their words would have been painful for others to read.I have deleted all my previous posts in this treated. because it turned in to an attack of my personally, and that will not benefit this thread.
ok. My view is tha sexuality is a personal matter and does not need to be shown toward other than the one you love. If people want to be with person of same gender, ok, no problem for me.No one was attacking you personally, all I wanted is to clarify what you meant.
You need a french-sounding term.Understood, and I agree with the sentiment. I've marched in pride parades with gay friends myself. But, as HonestJoe pointed out, "pride" isn't the best term for the movement. IMHO, pride is more than a lack of shame. It should be reserved for achievements.
We can be a passionate species. Spontaneous displays of joy and affection should not surprise or disgust anyone, rather we should be happy that people can find joy and display affection towards each other in this world.What is the difference between physical affection and exhibitionism?
When people are engaged in physical affection, their enjoyment is derived from each other. When people are engaged in exhibitionism, their enjoyment is derived from other people watching or the risk of being caught doing something naughty.
When people are involved in a physical activity in public, if it's exhibitionism, A negative reaction nurtures the exhibitionism.
Because of this, if exhibitionism is something that is deemed morally unfavorable, the best thing to do is ignore it.