I thought that, rather than simply going over the source behind the OP's link, it might be useful for those interested to look at other sources that, while perhaps more technical, are also a bit more broad in scope. Unfortunately, even with the vast amount of freely available sources, it is hard to find studies and other sources that are freely (and legally) available, accessible, and that accurately review the state of research on the interaction(s) between science and religion. Generally speaking, whenever someone is interested in a topic but doesn't know which sources to trust, I recommend one of the many Handbook/Companion series published by Oxford University Press, Blackwell, Cambridge University Press, and Routledge (all academic publishing companies). The present a broad spectrum of views on a particular topic (from computational linguistics to Socrates) in the form of paper by experts which are intended to be introductory and provide excellent bibliographies.
Luckily,
The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science is available to read online
here (the link also provides various ways to download the book, including as
a pdf file). I am pretty familiar with the hosting site archive.org, as they host a great deal of out-of-print, historical, government, and other documents but rarely are they able to host modern ebooks due to copyright constraints. Thankfully, an increasing number of academic publishing companies are making some of the publications free and apparently this is one.
For an interesting review (mostly) on the ways in which religion and science have interacted may be found in the paper Harrison, P. (2006).
“Science” and “Religion”: Constructing the Boundaries.
The Journal of Religion 86(1), pp. 81-106.
I chose it because, apart from being freely available, it presents research not generally known even to philosophers & historians of science: that "religion" as we generally understand the term is a fairly modern construction (mostly generated by, and based upon, a fairly late era of Christian thought). Additionally, the author presents what is probably a minority view but a substantial one: rather than examine how Christianity influenced, was responsible for, or played an essential role in the emergence of science he (accurately) recognizes that "science" as distinct from natural philosophy postdates Galileo, Newton, Laplace, and everybody else prior to the mid-19th century. Personally, I'd argue for greater continuity than the author, but then one must deal with the influences of Christianity on the origins of science (and almost as complicated, the divide between technological or philosophical developments and science). Additionally, the author is able to go beyond the historical influences that are almost entirely Christian and look at the ways in which e.g., Buddhism continues to motivate research by e.g., neuroimaging studies on meditation. As someone who conducts neuroimaging studies, I'm less than pleased by the plethora of junk neuroscience motivated by alternative therapies and the like, but I have to concede that mainstream neuroscience is also filled with junk studies.
For those who want an in-depth and very balanced but highly accessible text on the modern relationship between scientists and religion (and by extension science and religion) there is a well-done, scholarly, and relatively cheap book:
Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really Think.
Apart from that, the literature is vast, complicated, and while I'm happy to recommend sources (and check to see if they are available for free), I don't think most are interested enough to read hundreds or thousands of pages.