Excellent question .. complete with a calculation .. showing your work .. showing you put at least a few brain cells to work.
Indeed -- ALL medical procedures carry some sort of non zero percent risk. and in fact the odds of harm from a Terrorist attack as a US citizen in the US ... is 400 times less than the risk of harm from "Walking" ... god forbid you drive a car.
So - then ..on the other side of the scale .. "Safe" is not 100% safe .. but what is that percentage .. and to what risk of harm .. if I said look ..Cross that Bridge over yonder .. only have a 1 in 100 chance of dying .. picture Russian roullette with 100 chambers .. and one bullet.
Is that bridge safe to cross ? how about a 1 in 1000 chance ? how about 1 in 1 million chance.. .. math games that make you go hmmm
Now .. we are not talking death here although we are .. as there is also a risk of death from an SAR .. but most are not fatal .. death a very small percentage of the total and so I will completly reject it from the risk calculation.
What is an SAR - Severe Adverse Reaction - ... now crossing that bridge has a 1 in 100 chance of SAR ... is that safe ? For arguments sake .. let us assume that an SAR is something really bad .. so bad you don't want to go through it .. something leaving permanent scars and damage to your heart.. where at some pont you were at real risk .. and not hypothetical risk of death .. a "Fight for your life" so to speak in which some small percentage die .. maybe 0.125
I don't know the answer but know where i might find it
Most SAR's are myocharditis .. swelling in the liver tissue .. leaving scaring .. sometimes a heart attack .. another bad one is if the swelling happens in the brain .. stroke .. bad things. assume the definition includes a lengthy stay in the hospital .. not something you want to willingly take on.
Bridge .. 1 in 100 chance of SAR ? is it safe ? How about if its a bridge on your way to work - 200 days a year .. both ways so 400 crossing. is the bridge Safe ? knowing that one day this year you get to put the revolver to your head with 3 of the 4 chambers full ... and pull the trigger .. the lucky winner having a Severe Adverse Reaction ..
How about 1 in 1000 chance .. 3 of 40 chambers now full .. "Do ya feel lucky Punk" ?
Now .. as the smart calculater I know you are .. - will say but , I am not jabbing myself every day .. which is correct.. so lets factor that into the equation. How many times are you Jabbing per year .. lets go with 3... over 10 years = 30 Jabs.. each containing a 1 in 800 chance of SAR for the average person .. but sorry .. You are not the average person .. we are talking about your Son who is from 16-30 years in age .. healthy - has had covid so has natural immunity .. and thus will gain almost zero benefit from the vax if any .. in fact have a study somewhere .. oh yeah .. was the cleveland study .. says you should not Jab if you have natural immunity .. but even if you didn't the risk of harm from "Omnicron" to a fellow in this demographic is statistically zero .. if you thought 0.125% was low .. talking one in 5 million or some ridiculously high number .. keeping in mind the healthy part .. which is very important ... as all the stats you been hearing related to the really unhealthy segment of the population. but I have digressed.
Our subject .. a lad - 16-30 .. has a 300% greater risk of Myocharditis than the ave .. So now we are talking not 1 in 800 but 1 in 266 .. call it 1 in 300 to compensate for the fact that not all SAR's are Myo .. roughly 80% .. but you don't want the other stuff anyway .. "Brain swelling"
1 in 300 .. Jabbing 3 times a year for 10 years = 1 in 30 chance .. over 30 years 1 in 10 .. Jab for 90 years and its 1 in 3.
You tell me .. is that Safe ? and for the average person it is 1 in 9 ... still not really Safe from that perspective now is it.
but Wait .. surely someone has outlined where this Safty bar is for Vaccines .. and in fact ... happy day indeed they have done so .. and what is even better .. the metric used is SAR ... Severe Adverse Reaction.
The Swine Flu vax was taken off the market .. "Not safe enough" having an SAR of 1 in 100,000. The bar where there is universal acceptance would be 1 in 1 million .. so somewhere in between A and B is what the medical "do no harm" community has to say on the issue.
So when you take your 16 year old boy to the doctor .. a healthy lad .. beat covid once already .. said he had far worse flue's in the past - risk of harm "SAR" in the millions and the Doctor .. who gives you the stat I just mentioned .. as is their duty when offering any medical treatment .. and tells you the risk for your lad is 1 in 300 .. per Jab .. the recommended dosage is 6 Jabs a year cause the effect wanes quickly and thus after 10 years of this treatment .. will be a 1 in 5 chance of having major heart damage.
Is that Safe ? considering the vax is not doing anything for a healthy person .. because there is nothing to do .. healthy folks were not showing up at the hospital with Covid in any significant numbers .. never mind hitting the ICU and dying from Omicron. and in Omicron was a number of times less harmful to the healthy than the seasonal flue. and while I am not recommending the seasonal flue vax .. not for nor against .. I can tell you that the risk of an SAR from the flue shot is nowhere near 1-800 for the average soul.
