Ebionite
Well-Known Member
Your interpretation of events is not objective science - you have no testable hypothesis that the so-called vaccines were effective, only a few cases for which no significant conclusions can be inferred.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Suppression of Free Speech on Covid
- Thread starter Kenny
- Start date
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
You making **** up is not the same thing as an actual fact. The point is that you are inventing a fiction and labelling it as a fact to deflect attention away from the description of a potential mechanism for adverse effects from the Pfizer product that was sold as safe and effective.
Last edited:
McBell
Unbound
When I am constantly having to correct your spelling errors (mind you it is ONLY the name you misspell) when I check out the author of the quote you present...
But hey, no need to be worried about the constant misspelling.
The fact that you are using it to distract from the seriously lacking credibility of your sources speaks volumes.
McBell
Unbound
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
The only thing you are doing "constantly" is showing how ineffective you are as an apologist for the pharmaceutical industry.
Last edited:
Why do you say "so-called"?
Ref....
Dictionary.com | Meanings & Definitions of English Words
The world's leading online dictionary: English definitions, synonyms, word origins, example sentences, word games, and more. A trusted authority for 25+ years!
- any preventive preparation used to stimulate the body’s immune response against a specific disease, using either messenger RNA or killed or weakened bacteria or viruses to prepare the body to recognize a disease and produce antibodies.
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
How about myriads from peer-reviewed science sources such as with Scientific American, which had most of an entire issue on covid and the production of the vaccines? What you are doing is cherry-picking the sources you want to use to justify your predetermined position, and doing that is the antithesis of science.
Maybe start reading here, and please note the actual science sources at the end: COVID-19 vaccine - Wikipedia
McBell
Unbound
Well, since I am merely pointing out the seriously lacking credibility of your sources...
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
Because the definition of a vaccine was changed, and the Pfizer product doesn't fit the original definition.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
"Dr. Paul Offit explains why it’s virtually impossible for DNA fragments in COVID-19 mRNA vaccines to cause harms, such as cancers or autoimmune diseases.
Dr. Offit describes what would have to happen in order for DNA fragments to cause harm by explaining three protective mechanisms in our cells that DNA fragments from mRNA vaccines cannot overcome. First, the cytoplasm has immune mechanisms and enzymes that destroy foreign DNA. Second, the fragments would have to enter the nucleus, which requires a nuclear membrane access signal that these DNA fragments don't have. Third, even if they were able to enter the nucleus, the fragments would need to have an enzyme called integrase to become part of our DNA, which they also don’t have.
These facts should be reassuring to anyone concerned about a health risk caused by DNA fragments in vaccines."
Do DNA Fragments in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Cause Harm? | Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Dr. Paul Offit explains why it’s virtually impossible for DNA fragments in COVID-19 mRNA vaccines to cause harms, such as cancers or autoimmune diseases.
Paul A. Offit, MD
Paul A. Offit, MD, is the Director of the Vaccine Education Center and an attending physician in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Areas of Expertise: Vaccines
Locations: Main Hospital
Paul A. Offit, MD | Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Paul A. Offit, MD, is the Director of the Vaccine Education Center and an attending physician in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
So you just believe everything you read on the internet, so long as it fits your pre-determined narrative? It sure seems that way.
What was the definition before the one I posted?
When was the change.
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
Your "peer reviewed science" science doesn't have an alternative hypothesis which explains the increase in mortality that occurred after the "safe and effective vaccines" were rolled out. The only hypotheses on the table is that the mortality is due to disruption of normal DNA sequences, the disruption being caused by the presence of DNA fragments in the Pfizer product.
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
Look it up.
There is no alternative hypothesis
because what you claim is wrong.
The Relationship of COVID-19 Vaccination with Mortality Among 86,732 Hospitalized Patients: Subpopulations, Patient Factors, and Changes over Time
Information on COVID-19 vaccination effects on mortality among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 could inform vaccination outreach efforts and increase understanding of patient risk.Determine the associations of vaccination status with mortality in ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
You made the claim.
Do you have no evidence for it?
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
I know of one guy who lost consciousness after being jabbed and another who felt nothing at all. The bulk effects are where the real information is.
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
My claim is not wrong. You're making **** up because you can't cope with the facts about potential DNA disruption.
If that's all you know, then I suggest some reading.
This is the best easy-to-digest source I've found....
