Suppression of Free Speech on Covid

[Revoltingest]

My claim is not wrong.

I posted evidence.

You're making **** up because you can't cope with the facts about potential DNA disruption.

I make up nothing. I don't know enuf
about the relevant fields to do that.
So I link to cromulent sources.

I highly recommend reading some sources
that aren't promulgated by conspiracy
theorists & goofball politicians.

 

[Ebionite]

You made the claim.
Do you have no evidence for it?

You have nothing of value on the table about the change in the meaning of the language.

 

[Revoltingest]

You have nothing of value on the table about the change in the meaning of the language.

You made a claim you can't support.
It seems you're just making things up
as you go, hoping that no one will notice.

 

[Ebionite]

I posted evidence.

Evidence that you are ignorant of the potential for harm from DNA disruption.

I highly recommend reading some sources
that aren't promulgated by conspiracy
theorists & goofball politicians.

I highly recommend that you learn how to address the actual argument so that you don't look like a brain-dead apologist for big pharma.

 

[Ebionite]

You made a claim you can't support.

I can support it. I won't post that support because you have nothing of value on the table.

 

[Revoltingest]

Evidence that you are ignorant of the potential for harm from DNA disruption.

I am ignorant...of something you've shown to actually happen.

I highly recommend that you learn how to address the actual argument so that you don't look like a brain-dead apologist for big pharma.

Bless your heart.

Was it embarrassing to claim the definition of
"vaccine" changed, & not be able to support it?

 

[Revoltingest]

I can support it. I won't post that support because you have nothing of value on the table.

Oh, so that is the reason you can't
show anyone your proof of your claim.

Thank you for letting me twist the knife.

 

[Ebionite]

I am ignorant...of something you've shown to actually happen.

Bless your heart.

Was it embarrassing to claim the definition of
"vaccine" changed, & not be able to support it?

Ignoring what I said only shows that you can't cope with the situation.

 

[Revoltingest]

Ignoring what I said only shows that you cant cope with the situation.

Yeah....that's gotta be it.

 

[Ebionite]

Yeah....that's gotta be it.

If you have a point to make about DNA disruption from Pfizer's product then why don't you express it?

 

[Revoltingest]

If you have a point to make about DNA disruption from Pfizer's product then why don't you express it?

Let's see that evidence for the definition
of "vaccine" being changed / wrong first.

Bet ya canna do it!

 

[Ebionite]

Let's see that evidence for the definition
of "vaccine" being changed / wrong first.

Bet ya canna do it!

Wining a bet with you is of no value to me.

 

[Revoltingest]

So your only strategy is to ignore what I said. Got it.

I'm waiting for your evidence for your claim.

Not holding my breath though. As soon as
you told me to find it for you, I knew you're
bluffing.

 

[Ebionite]

As soon as
you told me to find it for you, I knew you're
bluffing.

I didn't do it for my benefit. The point remains that you can't cope with the primary issue of DNA disruption caused by Pfizer's product.

 

[Revoltingest]

I didn't do it for my benefit.

Dig'n that hole deeper, eh.

 

[metis]

Your "peer reviewed science" science doesn't have an alternative hypothesis which explains the increase in mortality that occurred after the "safe and effective vaccines" were rolled out. The only hypotheses on the table is that the mortality is due to disruption of normal DNA sequences, the disruption being caused by the presence of DNA fragments in the Pfizer product.

You are not working from a peer-reviewed science paradigm, and it is unethical, imo, to hunt & peck for any source that fits into your pre-determined narrative, especially with people's lives at stake. The comparison on the source I linked you to shows the danger of neglecting the actual science on this.

 

[metis]

I didn't do it for my benefit. The point remains that you can't cope with the primary issue of DNA disruption caused by Pfizer's product.

Well:

Myth 2: The vaccines will alter your DNA.​

None of the vaccines interact with or alter a person’s genetic material, known as DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid), the CDC confirms. The vaccines help the cells build protection against a coronavirus infection, but the vaccine material never enters the nucleus of the cell where the DNA lives.

When it comes to the mRNA vaccines, after the cell is done using the instructions delivered, it breaks down and gets rid of the mRNA. And the genetic material delivered by the viral vector (used in the Johnson & Johnson vaccine) does not integrate into a person’s DNA, the CDC says... -- 10 COVID Vaccine Myths

 

[metis]

Another:
CLAIM: Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine contains a DNA sequence called Simian Virus 40 that can cause health problems, including cancer.

AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. No evidence has been found to suggest DNA fragments used in the development of the coronavirus vaccine -- such as a portion of SV40’s DNA sequence -- are causing health problems in people who have received the COVID-19 vaccine... -- No evidence that DNA sequence used in Pfizer shot leads to cancer and other health issues

 

[SkepticThinker]

My claim is not wrong. You're making **** up because you can't cope with the facts about potential DNA disruption.

"Dr. Paul Offit explains why it’s virtually impossible for DNA fragments in COVID-19 mRNA vaccines to cause harms, such as cancers or autoimmune diseases.

Dr. Offit describes what would have to happen in order for DNA fragments to cause harm by explaining three protective mechanisms in our cells that DNA fragments from mRNA vaccines cannot overcome. First, the cytoplasm has immune mechanisms and enzymes that destroy foreign DNA. Second, the fragments would have to enter the nucleus, which requires a nuclear membrane access signal that these DNA fragments don't have. Third, even if they were able to enter the nucleus, the fragments would need to have an enzyme called integrase to become part of our DNA, which they also don’t have.

These facts should be reassuring to anyone concerned about a health risk caused by DNA fragments in vaccines."

Do DNA Fragments in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Cause Harm? | Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Dr. Paul Offit explains why it’s virtually impossible for DNA fragments in COVID-19 mRNA vaccines to cause harms, such as cancers or autoimmune diseases.

www.chop.edu

According to the Director of the Vaccine Education Center, Professor of Vaccinology, and attending physician in the Division of Infectious Diseases at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and member of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, your claim is incorrect.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Well:

Myth 2: The vaccines will alter your DNA.​

None of the vaccines interact with or alter a person’s genetic material, known as DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid), the CDC confirms. The vaccines help the cells build protection against a coronavirus infection, but the vaccine material never enters the nucleus of the cell where the DNA lives.

When it comes to the mRNA vaccines, after the cell is done using the instructions delivered, it breaks down and gets rid of the mRNA. And the genetic material delivered by the viral vector (used in the Johnson & Johnson vaccine) does not integrate into a person’s DNA, the CDC says... -- 10 COVID Vaccine Myths

All these people are showing us is that the don't understand the basics of how the human body works.
No wonder they get taken in by these nutso conspiracy theories.