Kathryn
It was on fire when I laid down on it.
OK. My doctor calls it a flu shot.OK. Nevertheless, in medicine, it's called an influenza vaccine.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
OK. My doctor calls it a flu shot.OK. Nevertheless, in medicine, it's called an influenza vaccine.
It's still a "vaccine".OK. My doctor calls it a flu shot.
Perhaps with his patients, but not when dealing with other physicians and not when ordering it for his office:OK. My doctor calls it a flu shot.
"The problem is that embalmers and funeral directors are not medical professionals. Don’t take it from me, but from the National Funeral Directors Association in the United States, whose representative told me as much, and from Ben Schmidt, a funeral director and embalmer with a bachelor’s degree in natural science. Schmidt wrote a detailed explanation of what is happening here. Clots can easily form after death, as the liquid and solid parts of blood separate and as formaldehyde and calcium-containing water used in the embalming process catalyze clotting. Refrigeration can also be to blame, especially when a rapid influx of bodies due to COVID necessitates longer stays in the cooler as embalmers make their way through their backlog.Subject: Are You Investigating the "White Fibrous Clots" and Their Potential Link to the COVID-19 Vaccines?
To the FDA, CDC, and NIH,
As you can see below, I submitted a written package on 19 Jan 2023 to the FDA to alert the Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) to a very serious potential link between the COVID-19 vaccines and the formation of these new, large, and unusual "white fibrous clots/structures" that embalmers across the United States and the world are seeing in their corpses, most since 2021 and continuing to present.
The embalmers that I am in contact with are still seeing these "white fibrous clots" in a high percentage of their corpses in Fall 2023. Keep in mind that most of these embalmers have been embalming bodies for over ten or twenty years, yet they have never seen these white fibrous clots before until 2021, which just happens to be the year that the COVID-19 vaccines rolled out.
Attached to this email are the original files that I submitted to the FDA on 19 Jan 2023, including a PowerPoint presentation with the results of an online survey that I conducted in Dec 2022 - Jan 2023 which solicited responses from 30 state funeral director associations and over 800 funeral homes in major cities across the United States. Also included is an "updated" version of the PowerPoint presentation that now also includes the survey results from Canada, UK, Australia, and New Zealand that were collected in March 2023.
My hope is that you have reviewed the information that I sent to you in January, and that you are already thoroughly investigating these new and unusual "white fibrous clots" that embalmers are still seeing in the veins and arteries of the deceased, and their potential link to the COVID-19 vaccines.
Please feel free to contact me at <redacted> if you have any questions.
This is a serious problem, and it deserves your immediate attention.
Respectfully,
Thomas F. Haviland
USAF Major, Retired
Beavercreek, OH
<e-mail redacted>
Phone: <redacted>
Link
Yet another ad hominem.The problem is that embalmers and funeral directors are not medical professionals.
Misdirection. The clots were found as the blood was drained prior to formaldehyde being added.Clots can easily form after death, as the liquid and solid parts of blood separate and as formaldehyde and calcium-containing water used in the embalming process catalyze clotting.
That's not an ad hom. It's just a fact.Yet another ad hominem.
Good thing they gave several different reasons that the blood clots could be present then:Misdirection. The clots were found as the blood was drained prior to formaldehyde being added.
Not a medical professional, as noted above. That's not an ad hom anymore than it's an ad hom to state that a plumber isn't qualified to do the electrical work on your home.John O'Looney, peer reviewed author and funeral director at Milton Keynes Family Funeral Services, England, discusses strange blood clots he has been seeing in the embalming process ever since the Covid-19 vaccine was introduced
Same old BS from you, calling a fallacy a fact. It's an ad hom because whether they're a "medical professional" all not doesn't affect the relevance of their observations.That's not an ad hom. It's just a fact.
Same old BS from you, calling a fallacy a fact. It's an ad hom because whether they're a "medical professional" all not doesn't affect the relevance of their observations.
No, it's called scientism, not believing anyone unless the information is approved by orthdoxy.It's called having standards so you just don't believe whatever anybody says.
Straw man. O'Looney was not making "medical determinations", his was recounting his observations.It's not a fallacy to point out that someone is not a medical professional and thus not qualified to make medical determinations.
Another straw man. "Uniformed anecdotes" are witness testimony.If they guy was able to publish his findings somewhere, let's see them. Otherwise, he's sharing uninformed anecdotes.
You've misused this term. You seem to mean insult, which the comment also was not. Ad hominem refers to a particular informal fallacy, namely, that a person's argument is wrong or should be rejected because of something about the person. For example, one might reject the argument of an 8-year old on the grounds that's he's too young to make a sound argument based in his age without critical analysis of the argument.Yet another ad hominem.
And you've misused this term, as well. It has two meanings, one descriptive and one derogatory, but your usage is neither of those. What it is is a straw man fallacy:it's called scientism, not believing anyone unless the information is approved by orthdoxy.
No, I haven't. I pointed out that it was about about relevance in this post.You've misused this term.
You don't know what you're talking about. Scientism is worthless because the scientific method is incapable of providing an explanation for non-repeatable phenomena such as the interaction of divine beings with mankind. This is particularly relevant for modern medicine because of the conflict of interests that exists between natural medicine and the the state due the the religious prejudice of the union of the state and the church.And you've misused this term, as well.
The changed definition looks to me as if it has been adapted to include the new mRNA vaccine technology, which also achieves the same goal, viz. stimulates an immune response, but not by means of weakened or deactivated whole pathogens.Merriam-Webster:
2013 definition of VACCINE: “a preparation of killed microorganisms, living attenuated organisms, or living fully virulent organisms that is administered to produce or artificially increase immunity to a particular disease
2021 definition of VACCINE: “a preparation or immunotherapy that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against noninfectious substances, agents, or diseases”
What do you think is implied by this? "Because you know flu shots are also called flu vaccines by pretty much everone else, right?"
It doesn't achieve the same goal because of the extraordinary level of harm caused by the new technology, as evidenced by the mortician testimony and the the correlation between injection of the new technology and death.The changed definition looks to me as if it has been adapted to include the new mRNA vaccine technology, which also achieves the same goal, viz. stimulates an immune response, but not by means of weakened or deactivated whole pathogens.
Ballocks. These RNA vaccines have been used all over the world with negligible ill effects.It doesn't achieve the same goal because of the extraordinary level of harm caused by the new technology, as evidenced by the mortician testimony and the the correlation between injection of the new technology and death.
From Steve Kirsch, November 24th:
Will anyone qualified challenge me in a public debate at MIT on Nov 30 on what the record level data shows about the safety of the COVID vaccines?
I'll provide you the data in advance. You agree to publicly debate me at MIT on November 30. I'll pay your expenses plus a $2,000 speaking fee. Any takers?
A 1.3 severe event ratio is not negligible.Ballocks. These RNA vaccines have been used all over the world with negligible ill effects.
Kirsch is a businessman, with no medical expertise, who tried and failed to make money out of alternative covid treatments and resented his lack of success. Nobody's interesting in wasting their time debating with a clown like that. Who does he think he is? The guy's an irrelevance.
One of our local funeral home workers told me about this recent phenomenon of white fibrous clots in the veins of some corpses. He said he'd never seen this prior to covid. Is this due to the virus itself or a vaccine injury? Years ago, I worked for a time at a funeral home and never saw anything like this myself.Subject: Are You Investigating the "White Fibrous Clots" and Their Potential Link to the COVID-19 Vaccines?
To the FDA, CDC, and NIH,
As you can see below, I submitted a written package on 19 Jan 2023 to the FDA to alert the Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) to a very serious potential link between the COVID-19 vaccines and the formation of these new, large, and unusual "white fibrous clots/structures" that embalmers across the United States and the world are seeing in their corpses, most since 2021 and continuing to present.
The embalmers that I am in contact with are still seeing these "white fibrous clots" in a high percentage of their corpses in Fall 2023. Keep in mind that most of these embalmers have been embalming bodies for over ten or twenty years, yet they have never seen these white fibrous clots before until 2021, which just happens to be the year that the COVID-19 vaccines rolled out.
Attached to this email are the original files that I submitted to the FDA on 19 Jan 2023, including a PowerPoint presentation with the results of an online survey that I conducted in Dec 2022 - Jan 2023 which solicited responses from 30 state funeral director associations and over 800 funeral homes in major cities across the United States. Also included is an "updated" version of the PowerPoint presentation that now also includes the survey results from Canada, UK, Australia, and New Zealand that were collected in March 2023.
My hope is that you have reviewed the information that I sent to you in January, and that you are already thoroughly investigating these new and unusual "white fibrous clots" that embalmers are still seeing in the veins and arteries of the deceased, and their potential link to the COVID-19 vaccines.
Please feel free to contact me at <redacted> if you have any questions.
This is a serious problem, and it deserves your immediate attention.
Respectfully,
Thomas F. Haviland
USAF Major, Retired
Beavercreek, OH
<e-mail redacted>
Phone: <redacted>
Link
I was talking to my dermatologist last year, and he said that ever since covid he's seen all sorts of effects probably from it, and I am one of those people: psoriasis, which I never had previously for 77 years.One of our local funeral home workers told me about this recent phenomenon of white fibrous clots in the veins of some corpses. He said he'd never seen this prior to covid. Is this due to the virus itself or a vaccine injury? Years ago, I worked for a time at a funeral home and never saw anything like this myself.
Covid might or might not be responsible for your psoriasis, but it shouldn't be surprising that there are both short-term and long-term sequelae to this infection, which is common with viruses. Short-term complications include long Covid, as well as various organ dysfunctions. Here are some links I collected earlier:I was talking to my dermatologist last year, and he said that ever since covid he's seen all sorts of effects probably from it, and I am one of those people: psoriasis, which I never had previously for 77 years.