• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Tampon Tim

We Never Know

We Never Know

No Slack
The Hammer said:
"those weapons of war that I carried in war is the only place where those weapons are at."

Click to expand...
IMO he didn't carry a weapon "in war".

He carried a weapon during war time.

A person who served lets say at For Campbell during the war carried a weapon during war time, they didn't carry a weapon in war.

Now one can argue "in war" means "during war time" and one can argue it literally means "in war".

The man is a 24 year vet and should be respected as such. He isn't claiming to be a combat vet.
 
The Hammer

The Hammer

Skald
Premium Member
We Never Know said:
IMO he didn't carry a weapon "in war".
Click to expand...
Ok
We Never Know said:
He carried a weapon during war time.
Click to expand...
Same thing imo
We Never Know said:
A person who served lets say at For Campbell during the war carried a weapon during war time, they didn't carry a weapon in war.
Click to expand...
We Never Know said:
Now one can argue "in war" means "during war time" and one can argue it literally means "in war".
Click to expand...
Your opinion is understood.
We Never Know said:
The man is a 24 year vet and should be respected as such. He isn't claiming to be a combat vet.
Click to expand...
Absolutely.
 
Argentbear

Argentbear

Well-Known Member
Shaul said:
No, it's the truth. An inconvenient truth that you want to deny. Tell it to the Washington Post.
"In March 2023, Walz issued an executive order protecting trans patients’ ability to receive medical care that helps them live according to their gender identity. The order shields patients, parents and providers from punishment by other states for seeking and delivering such care. The next month, he signed legislation enshrining similar protections that supporters said would establish Minnesota as a “trans refuge.”"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/08/07/tim-walz-minnesota-trans-refuge-bill/
Click to expand...
you claimed that this executive order:
"allows people to bring children from other states, against the wishes of parents"
and
"get the children's genitals surgically altered"

Neither of these is true

Again why are you choosing to lie?
 
Pogo

Pogo

Well-Known Member
mikkel_the_dane said:
Find another source. Behind a paywal.
Click to expand...
Not for me so the relevant parts by fair use.
The law does not take children away from parents, it covers cases where there is a disagreement between parents.
From Wapo:
The Minnesota law allows courts to have “temporary emergency jurisdiction” during custody disputes crossing state lines if a child has been unable to obtain gender-affirming care. Kat Rohn, executive director of OutFront, an LGBTQ+ advocacy organization in St. Paul, Minn., said the law gives courts the ability to resolve conflicts when parents disagree on whether their child should receive gender-affirming care; it does not remove custody from parents who decline such care.

In providing gender-affirming care for trans children and adolescents, clinicians may offer patients counseling to assist in their social transition to match their gender identity such as changing their names, pronouns and hairstyles. They may also prescribe puberty-suppressing treatments under close monitoring. They generally do not offer genital surgeries until adulthood.
and
passing a trans refuge bill designed to prevent the state from enforcing court orders from other states to remove children from parents who approve gender-affirming care.

As usual, reality is not what he thinks it is.
 
Pogo

Pogo

Well-Known Member
The Hammer said:
"those weapons of war that I carried in war is the only place where those weapons are at."

Click to expand...
Ok, maybe a clearification of his comment re the automatic rifle that he is distinguishing as a war weapon not a civilian weapon that he carried while in the service.

In the service is what I remember for veterans whether they were in theatre or not or whether there was a war or not.
Nevermind that by law, only Congress can declare war and they haven't done that in a long time so they are all wrong.
 
Pogo

Pogo

Well-Known Member
We Never Know said:
IMO he didn't carry a weapon "in war".

He carried a weapon during war time.

A person who served lets say at For Campbell during the war carried a weapon during war time, they didn't carry a weapon in war.

Now one can argue "in war" means "during war time" and one can argue it literally means "in war".

The man is a 24 year vet and should be respected as such. He isn't claiming to be a combat vet.
Click to expand...
While we are nitpicking pedantry, it wasn't war, the last one was WWII

The United States last formally declared war in 1942 against Hungary, Bulgaria, and Romania, which were aligned with the Axis powers. President Franklin Roosevelt believed that it was improper to engage in hostilities without a formal declaration of war. The Senate unanimously approved the declarations of war against Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania in June 1942 by margins of 357-0, 360-0, and 361-0, respectively. The next day, the Senate passed the declarations by a 73-0 margin in each instance.


And a rifle is a gun but a gun is not necessarily a rifle just like a dachshund is a dog.

Let's not get into rifled slugs which are not used in rifles but are used in shotguns though shot is plural and slug is not.

:facepalm:
 
fantome profane

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
Shaul said:
No, it's the truth. An inconvenient truth that you want to deny. Tell it to the Washington Post.
"In March 2023, Walz issued an executive order protecting trans patients’ ability to receive medical care that helps them live according to their gender identity. The order shields patients, parents and providers from punishment by other states for seeking and delivering such care. The next month, he signed legislation enshrining similar protections that supporters said would establish Minnesota as a “trans refuge.”"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/08/07/tim-walz-minnesota-trans-refuge-bill/
Click to expand...
You might think the majority of voters are anti-trans, but I think these bills are going to appeal to the majority. Particularly young voters.

We will find out, it American is a hateful bigoted place, this will play against him. If it is a tolerant respectful place he it will help.
 
We Never Know

We Never Know

No Slack
Spice said:
There Is something I've heard him referred as quite a dew times that fits: Attack Dog-- so maybe Trump's service dog?

I've got to stop this. It's not nice. You're a bad influence on me, but I'm smiling.
Click to expand...

Yeah but these either start with the same letter or near rhyme.

Tampon Tim
Dishonest Don
Chameleon Kamala
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top