We Never Know
No Slack
Around 5% of the average citizen's income goes toward the universal healthcare youns have.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Tampon Tim
- Thread starter sun rise
- Start date
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Now since you know what you are talking about, it should be no problem for you to find the price for health as an average for a person for the USA and a country in the Western world. Likewise with the cost an avarage person pay for health care taxes, insurence, co-pay and so on for the USA and the same other country.
Spice
StewardshipPeaceIntergityCommunityEquality
Or finally taking a chance on a small business they've dreamed of.
PureX
Veteran Member
Every nation on the planet that has universal health care has had find a way to put a stop to medical price gouging. But the mere mention of such a thing in the U.S. is absolute sacrilege! Any politician that would dare even mention the idea of price caps would be immediately cut off from the corporate bribery train and would be slandered mercilessly in the corporate owned press. And maybe even murdered if he/she still would still not shut up about it. Corporate profits are the untouchable third rail of politics AND the media in the U.S. And the oligarchs controlling these corporate conglomerates have a very long and powerful reach.
We Never Know
No Slack
Yes some may try that too
We Never Know
No Slack
If you want all that info have at it.
Post your results when you're done.
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
No, I don't want that as such. I already have an idea about it, but I am not going to claim anything.
So if you were to guess, which country is best at it?
Walz isn't being criticized for not having served in a war. He is being criticized for is claiming he served in war despite that he has not. Asking a candidate for Vice President not to fabricate things isn't a nitpick. What is weird is people that don't care.
No, it's the truth. An inconvenient truth that you want to deny. Tell it to the Washington Post.
"In March 2023, Walz issued an executive order protecting trans patients’ ability to receive medical care that helps them live according to their gender identity. The order shields patients, parents and providers from punishment by other states for seeking and delivering such care. The next month, he signed legislation enshrining similar protections that supporters said would establish Minnesota as a “trans refuge.”"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/08/07/tim-walz-minnesota-trans-refuge-bill/
If he served during a time of war he is considered to have served in war whether or not he "saw combat". You are nitpicking at nothing.
Source: a decade of naval service.
Clizby Wampuscat
Well-Known Member
And what? Why was the text changed?
It isn't ONLY that, as I have already posted. It is part of a larger agenda of Gov. Walz to push for trans grooming among minor school students.
It isn't providing tampons in school bathrooms, it is providing tampons in boys bathrooms in schools. Don't misrepresent what he did.
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Find another source. Behind a paywal.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
To update it, perhaps? Better wording, less vague. Who knows.
What was your point about it?
LOL. Please keep slumbering in your denial. Tell yourself these things until after the election. Thank you.The meltdown is happening on the right, because none of their lies are sticking, including the one you amplified above. Twelve current polls show Harris/Walz ahead, and MAGA is scared out of their gourds that their aggrieved and shrinking minority will lose another general election.
We Never Know
No Slack
Served 'during wartime', not 'served in war'.
He is a vet regardless.
But if he claims things that aren't true, he should be called out on it. Same if Vance does.
Yes and in the context of what he said "a weapon of war I carried during war" is not out of place in my opinion.
"those weapons of war that I carried in war is the only place where those weapons are at."
Clizby Wampuscat
Well-Known Member
Go look at my post 155.
Neither Vance nor Walz appeared to have
been a combat soldier. Big ******* deal.
What each has claimed about their military
record looks questionable. And one can be
a soldier, & still be a criminal &/or idiot.
Military service isn't necessary for public office.
If what they say matters, the thing that stands
out most is Vance's severe criticism of "America's
Hitler", ie, the treasonous rapist he now supports.
And Vance's claim that Biden stole the election.
And the need to surveil women who cross state
lines. And.....all the other authoritarian idiocy.
been a combat soldier. Big ******* deal.
What each has claimed about their military
record looks questionable. And one can be
a soldier, & still be a criminal &/or idiot.
Military service isn't necessary for public office.
If what they say matters, the thing that stands
out most is Vance's severe criticism of "America's
Hitler", ie, the treasonous rapist he now supports.
And Vance's claim that Biden stole the election.
And the need to surveil women who cross state
lines. And.....all the other authoritarian idiocy.