Tampon Tim

[Revoltingest]

Are you asking me? Because you never asked me to provide my reasons for supporting Trump.

I never asked.
I don't always ask.
Sometimes it says more when others speak
(or not) of their personal values unbidden.

 

[Clizby Wampuscat]

I never asked.
I don't always ask.

Then why are you harassing me for not answering a question you never asked?

 

[Jayhawker Soule]

I think their issue is when the bills advocate said not all menstruating people are girls and they need to provide them in the boys bathrooms.

Why so thoughtless?

 

[Revoltingest]

Then why are you harassing me for not answering a question you never asked?

You're pursuing this.
I'm not.

 

[Clizby Wampuscat]

You're pursuing this.
I'm not.

I am responding to you and your posts. Are you done with this conversation?

 

[Revoltingest]

Why so thoughtless?

It's not thoughtlessness.
It's an attempt at cleverness.
But it falls flat when the audience
isn't fervently anti-woke.

 

[Clizby Wampuscat]

Why so thoughtless?

Ask them. It is not my stance.

 

[Revoltingest]

I am responding to you and your posts. Are you done with this conversation?

Did a conversation even start?

 

[Clizby Wampuscat]

Did a conversation even start?

We are having a conversation now. Do you have any questions for me or are you done?

 

[Revoltingest]

We are having a conversation now. Do you have any questions for me or are you done?

I leave it to you to express your
thoughts about favoring Trump.
Who am I to guide them, eh.

 

[PureX]

I believe the thing that gets many Republicans in general about Walz is that he is so dang progressive. Couple him with Kamala and wow, you've really got a far-left wing ticket.

As a progressive I can honestly say that neither one of them is the least bit progressive. Nothing about the democratic party is progressive. The right will of course accuse them of this loudly and endlessly because that's what riles up their hyper-conservative base to vote against the other guys instead of for their own less-than-stellar candidates. But in reality it's just more slander. The democratic party is very clearly NOT progressive. They are basically the equivalent to what the republican party was before Reagan.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Yep, they should really run with this one. That will bring in the female vote. Good plan guys.

I need to repeat how I love how the Republicans have self destructed after Kamala took over the campaign. Oh my!! I can hear the theme song in my head. We need a Mission Impossible commercial for Kamala stating her goal and how bad it looks ending with a photo of Trump with the statement "This candidate will self destruct in seven seconds".

 

[Kathryn]

As a progressive I can honestly say that neither one of them is the least bit progressive. Nothing about the democratic party is progressive. The right will of course accuse them of this loudly and endlessly because that's what riles up their hyper-conservative base to vote against the other guys instead of for their own less-than-stellar candidates. But in reality it's just more slander. The democratic party is very clearly NOT progressive. They are basically the equivalent to what the republican party was before Reagan.

You know what? I believe that neither party is the equivalent to what the Republican Party was before Reagan.

 

[Clizby Wampuscat]

As a progressive I can honestly say that neither one of them is the least bit progressive. Nothing about the democratic party is progressive. The right will of course accuse them of this loudly and endlessly because that's what riles up their hyper-conservative base to vote against the other guys instead of for their own less-than-stellar candidates. But in reality it's just more slander. The democratic party is very clearly NOT progressive. They are basically the equivalent to what the republican party was before Reagan.

What is a progressive?

 

[SkepticThinker]

Hey, all I know is that many years ago, when I was buying tampons and using them, I was always absolutely shocked at the price of tampons. I think it was because the people making or distributing them or whatever KNEW that women would buy them no matter what the price was so there. TAKE THAT.

Because you have to buy them. What else are you gonna do, walk around bleeding all over the place?
They know we have to buy them.

 

[Subduction Zone]

You know what? I believe that neither party is the equivalent to what the Republican Party was before Reagan.

True, but I would say that the Democrat party is closer. The Republican party used to be the party of fiscal responsibility. It was not "pro-life". It was even "socialist" since the Republican party gave us both OSHA and the EPA under Nixon. If you go back to Eisenhower there were very high tax rates for the rich. And Eisenhower not only continued the infrastructure of his Democratic predecessors, he expanded upon it.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Because you have to buy them. What else are you gonna do, walk around bleeding all over the place?
They know we have to buy them.

Can't you just hold it in <ducks>.

 

[Kathryn]

Can't you just hold it in <ducks>.

Ummm, no.

 

[PureX]

What is a progressive?

To be progressive means to actively pursue real change. The democratic party does not want to actively pursue any real or significant change because the oligarchs that are paying for their campaigns and for all their perks while in office and after don't want any significant changes. They're rakin' in the cash just fine the way things are.

 

[Twilight Hue]

Most girls start their periods when they're about 12, but they can start as early as 8, so it's important to talk to girls from an early age to make sure they're prepared.

Starting your periods

Most girls start their periods when they're about 12, but they can start as early as 8, so it's important to talk to girls from an early age to make sure they're prepared.

www.nhs.uk

That's what schools are for when the girls had that special movie in the auditorium.