I've been reflecting a lot about my own spiritual life lately, and coupled with all of the heavy reading I've been doing for class, this question came to mind:
Is there such a thing as Tantric Vaishnavism?
Not tantric as in a left hand path (vamachra), but also not completely falling within Vaishnava orthodoxy?
I've often wondered if I somehow fall within a tantric worldview. As I:
- Don't have such a restrictive view on sex (as in I don't see non-procreative sex within the context of long term commitment as "illicit")
- View scriptures more philosophically, mystically, and esoterically; instead of always straight up literal.
- Place little emphasis on most Puranas, to the point where most of them are not very important in my practice. Or I just flat out reject some of them (like the Garuda Purana). I also reject the Manu Smriti.
- I place a lot more emphasis on Shakti (Sri Lakshmi) than an average Vaishnava. More so than what is considered normative for Vadakalai or even Gaudiyas.
- Unless one is a priest or acharya, then I firmly believe that ones intentions or faith in doing rituals is technically more important than "doing them right". As in I don't think God will strike the average householder down if they mispronounce a few Sanskrit words or don't use the exact kind of materials as prescribed in scriptures.
Yet, with that said:
- I still believe vegetarianism is spiritually beneficial; especially for seekers and novices.
- The Vedas, Upanishads, Bhagavad Gita, Ramayana, and Lakshmi Tantra are highly important to me.
- Having a guru is a way to gain authentic (ie: non-watered down) knowledge.
- A mixture of the yogas (Karma, Bhakti, and Jnana) are ways to eventually reach saranagati.
- People still have their duties to perform, but personal commitment, temperament, and ability vary.
Is there such a thing as Tantric Vaishnavism?
Not tantric as in a left hand path (vamachra), but also not completely falling within Vaishnava orthodoxy?
I've often wondered if I somehow fall within a tantric worldview. As I:
- Don't have such a restrictive view on sex (as in I don't see non-procreative sex within the context of long term commitment as "illicit")
- View scriptures more philosophically, mystically, and esoterically; instead of always straight up literal.
- Place little emphasis on most Puranas, to the point where most of them are not very important in my practice. Or I just flat out reject some of them (like the Garuda Purana). I also reject the Manu Smriti.
- I place a lot more emphasis on Shakti (Sri Lakshmi) than an average Vaishnava. More so than what is considered normative for Vadakalai or even Gaudiyas.
- Unless one is a priest or acharya, then I firmly believe that ones intentions or faith in doing rituals is technically more important than "doing them right". As in I don't think God will strike the average householder down if they mispronounce a few Sanskrit words or don't use the exact kind of materials as prescribed in scriptures.
Yet, with that said:
- I still believe vegetarianism is spiritually beneficial; especially for seekers and novices.
- The Vedas, Upanishads, Bhagavad Gita, Ramayana, and Lakshmi Tantra are highly important to me.
- Having a guru is a way to gain authentic (ie: non-watered down) knowledge.
- A mixture of the yogas (Karma, Bhakti, and Jnana) are ways to eventually reach saranagati.
- People still have their duties to perform, but personal commitment, temperament, and ability vary.