Tara Rede the woman that accuses Biden of sexually assaulting her, sues DOJ for millions.

[Estro Felino]

This is a perfect example of
proof that you're not a "jurist".

Again ad hominem attacks.

 

[Estro Felino]

I think cases with insufficient evidence should be put on hold until proper evidence is produced. If they can't, then it's just the way it is if one wants to be fair about it.

That would be perfect in a sensible parallel universe.

 

[Revoltingest]

Again ad hominem attacks.

You confuse that with criticizing
your claim of legal authority.
Belief that videotapes are necessary
for conviction is utterly absurd.
Dismissing a jury verdict because you
personally haven't seen the evidence
is utterly absurd.
Giving credence to claims not supported
by any court equal footing to a judgment
in court is utterly absurd.
Italy cannot be so completely bonkers &
lawless that such views are normal there.

 

[Estro Felino]

You confuse that with criticizing
your claim of legal authority.
Belief that videotapes are necessary
for conviction is utterly absurd.
Dismissing a jury verdict because you
personally haven't seen the evidence
is utterly absurd.
Giving credence to claims not supported
by any court equal footing to a judgment
in court is utterly absurd.
Italy cannot be so completely bonkers &
lawless that such views are normal there.

Enlighten me, then.
Tell me what piece of evidence shows that Carroll was assaulted or raped by Trump in 1996.

 

[Twilight Hue]

If I say I had sex with Leonardo Di Caprio in 1999, it means it's true.
I got it.

That's the philosophy of a number of people these days. Guilty until proven innocent.

 

[Revoltingest]

Enlighten me, then.
Tell me what piece of evidence shows that Carroll was assaulted or raped by Trump in 1996.

I wasn't on the jury.

Can you imagine that if videotape were required
to find any one guilty or liable for a crime, that
rapists, robbers, killers, & extortionists would
rejoice at their impunity, especially because
some states make such recordings illegal.
A victim recording their own rape would be
prosecuted, while the evidence would be ruled
inadmissible.

 

[Father Heathen]

Tara Reid has been incredibly silent since she ran to Russia for her definition of safety from a vindictive Biden regime.

I'm in the dark just like everybody else as there was not a peep since until now.

You forgot to mention that on top of numerous inconsistencies and contradictions regarding her allegations, she had also misrepresented herself and her life experiences, lied about her education, and lied under oath. She probably fled to Russia because she was a paid asset.

I know conservatives hate hearing this, but facts matter.

Joe Biden sexual assault allegation - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Twilight Hue]

You forgot to mention that on top of numerous inconsistencies and contradictions regarding her allegations, she had also misrepresented herself and her life experiences, lied about her education, and lied under oath. She probably fled to Russia because she was a paid asset.

I know conservatives hate hearing this, but facts matter.

Joe Biden sexual assault allegation - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Still no dress. All allegations. No actual evidence.

Some 'facts'.

 

[Father Heathen]

Donald Trump Access Hollywood tape - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Subduction Zone]

Hit a Fox paywall. Any other accessible source?

I searched and could not find any reliable news sources covering this story. Does that automatically mean that it is a nothingburger? No, but it sure looks that way.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Suing an individual (Carroll v Trump) is fundamentally
very different from suing the federal government.
You'll be able to see what you want to see.

Hey, how did Reade's suit against Biden go?

You mean the one where her own attorney realized that there was nothing to it and quietly dropped out as her attorney?

 

[Revoltingest]

You mean the one where her own attorney realized that there was nothing to it and quietly dropped out as her attorney?

See!
The conspiracy against her prevents holding Biden accountable.

 

[Twilight Hue]

Donald Trump Access Hollywood tape - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So?

What's your point here?

 

[Twilight Hue]

You mean the one where her own attorney realized that there was nothing to it and quietly dropped out as her attorney?

What?

Is that solid proof to you?

 

[Revoltingest]

What?

Is that solid proof to you?

For a lawyer to turn down a case that would
have an upside in the millions....that's strong
evidence that her case is weak.
Compare that to Carroll, who actually took
her case to court, & won tens of millions.

 

[Twilight Hue]

For a lawyer to turn down a case that would
have an upside in the millions....that's strong
evidence that her case is weak.
Compare that to Carroll, who actually took
her case to court, & won tens of millions.

You don't know what really happened behind the scenes. You're only looking at the surface and making the conclusion based on what the media reports.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Enlighten me, then.
Tell me what piece of evidence shows that Carroll was assaulted or raped by Trump in 1996.

Personal testimony is evidence. Carroll did testify that Trump attacked her. Trump had the right and ability to testify, but he refused to. Carroll also told friends of hers of the attack when it happened and two of them testified that she had told them of the attack. That is evidence as well. It still relies on Carroll's original claims, but it shows that she made the claims long long before Trump got involved in politics. They had two other women testify of similar attacks by Trump and also of similar behavior by Trump after the attacks. Trump attacked the victims in all of those cases. That shows a pattern of behavior. To date there are 26 different women that have claimed that Trump attacked them sexually. Trump has admitted and women have come forward and confirmed, that he ogled underaged girls in a state of undress when he used to regularly barge into changing rooms while running the teen Miss Universe pageant. And of course he has openly advocated for grabbing women by the hee haw.

As in many cases when evidence is present it is not just one piece of evidence but the fact that there is so much evidence confirming this behavior. What many people do not seem to realize is that court cases would be very rare if one had to have a slam dunk piece of evidence. When there is a piece of slam dunk evidence people tend to plead guilty and avoid trials. Trials have to be base upon the totality of the evidence.

 

[Father Heathen]

So?

What's your point here?

They can share a cell together, so what was your point?

 

[Subduction Zone]

What?

Is that solid proof to you?

No. Did I say that it was? As I just explained about the evidence against Trump, it is not just once piece that puts someone away. The fact that her own lawyer dropped her and has nothing to say about her any longer is not a good sign. If we had slam dunk evidence we would not be discussing this. So one has to look at all of the evidence out there and see what picture it paints.

 

[Revoltingest]

You don't know what really happened behind the scenes.

But I have reasonable ideas based upon
results in court cases where each side
presents evidence & arguments.

You're only looking at the surface and making the conclusion based on what the media reports.

You're only defending Trump by seizing
upon superficial factoids culled ad hoc.