I do not mean to come off as aggressive, only assertive.
- I agree with this and I would like to conclude that thought by saying "at least we agree that there is more scientific areas that need explored."
That may very well be, but if you're going to stick your God in that "unexplored" region, then this means that it's unreasonable to make claims about him (e.g. that he exists).
-have you really been searching for proof or disproof of his existence? Proof is what you perceive it.
I disagree about your claim about the nature of "proof".
And how does it matter how much I've searched? Regardless of how much I've looked, I haven't found anything that points to God. If you're going to argue that if we keep on looking, we will find this, then you're just making baseless supposition. Right here and right now, I've seen no indication of the truth of any god-claim, so the proper thing to do is to not accept those claims for the time being. I should be prepared to re-examine this decision (as I should on any issue), but it's a bad idea to make assumptions about what evidence I might encounter until I encounter it.
-Love and fear are the emotions that drive all of our thoughts. Is it or is it not better to live in love than fear?
What does this have to do with what we're talking about?
... and what does God have to do with love? My godless life has lots of love in it and very little fear.