• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Texas Law Banning Abortion After About Six Weeks Takes Effect

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Yep. And when that's done, the US will split. The dems get the east and the west, the reps get the south (with plenty of space since the blacks, Mexicans and women left), the Mormons get Utah and the north gets annexed by Cannukistan.
Shattered Union prophecy. * ;0]




.....Just wondering when the UN will step in to save America.

* Seriously this game, particularly the trailer, is eerily uncanny, if not outright unsettling as an oracle for the future. It's like the developers knew.....
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
Shattered Union prophecy. * ;0]




.....Just wondering when the UN will step in to save America.

* Seriously this game, particularly the trailer, is eerily uncanny, if not outright unsettling as an oracle for the future. It's like the developers knew.....

Why would it even want to. Providing it was not being too much of a nuisance to Canada or Mexico.

America needs to self destruct. and reform out of the ashes.
Perhaps with the advice and leadership of China to lend a hand.
After all they will probably own the place by then.:rolleyes:
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
"Love it or leave it" is a classic, time-honored argument in the American political culture. It can be used in almost any situation.

Indeed it can.
The Australian equivalent of this is something like a shrug. I'll demonstrate.

'Hey Richo, the government just passed a law restricting the freedom of women to make decisions about their own bodies.'

*shrug*

'Hey Richo, the government just passed a law restricting the freedom of people throughout the country to freely assemble and protest.'

*shrug*

'Hey Richo, the government just raised taxes on booze and cigarettes.'

'Bloody wankers...'

'What should we do about it?'

*shrug*
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
No abortions, no masks, no vaccine. But a new law allows anyone to carry a gun without a permit. Sounds like the wild west is back.
It would be interesting to see a challenge of the new anti-abortion law under Texas's "stand your ground" or "castle doctrine" laws.

I ordered the fetus to leave and it refused to comply, so I was justified in using force against it.
 

pearl

Well-Known Member
I think that ultimately the right to abortion will be turned over to the individual states.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
What if some states wanted to reinstate slavery?
The right to abortion isn't specifically granted in the Constitution.
The prohibition against involuntary servitude is precisely stated
in the 13th Amendment. So there's a huge difference in legal
basis.
Note though that the military draft is unquestionably involuntary
servitude, yet all branches of government ignore the 13th, &
justify conscripting healthy young males.
 

pearl

Well-Known Member
The four dissenters — Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan — argued in separate rebuttals that their five colleagues, without any real debate, were rewarding Texas lawmakers for inventing a novel scheme to stomp on decades of Supreme Court precedent.

"The statutory scheme before the Court is not only unusual, but unprecedented," Roberts wrote, and he would have granted "preliminary relief" at least until "the courts may consider whether a state can avoid responsibility for its laws in such a manner." Instead, the court allowed the law to take effect before lower courts weighed in, "without ordinary merits briefing, and without oral argument."
Chief Justice Roberts, 3 other dissenters slam colleagues for hastily rewarding Texas 'bounty hunter' abortion ban scheme (msn.com)
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
The right to abortion isn't specifically granted in the Constitution.
The prohibition against involuntary servitude is precisely stated
in the 13th Amendment. So there's a huge difference in legal
basis.
Note though that the military draft is unquestionably involuntary
servitude, yet all branches of government ignore the 13th, &
justify conscripting healthy young males.

The 13th Amendment contains one notable exception:

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

So, all they have to do is find some bogus thing to charge people ("drug possession" seems to be the go to choice, since the evidence can be easily planted), then send them to privatized prison where their labor can be rented out at a profit to the prison owners.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
The 13th Amendment contains one notable exception:

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

So, all they have to do is find some bogus thing to charge people ("drug possession" seems to be the go to choice, since the evidence can be easily planted), then send them to privatized prison where their labor can be rented out at a profit to the prison owners.
You sure don't like privatization. However, the state is
even more capable of extracting labor from the unwilling.
 
Last edited:

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
The 13th Amendment contains one notable exception:

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

So, all they have to do is find some bogus thing to charge people ("drug possession" seems to be the go to choice, since the evidence can be easily planted), then send them to privatized prison where their labor can be rented out at a profit to the prison owners.
Aha! So all we need to do is to make sex illegal and pregnancy the punishment. Frankly I would not be surprised if a far right winger proposes that.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Even though I'm pro-life, this bill by Abbott & Co is likely to be overturned even with this right-dominated court because it involves an "uninterested third party" filing a lawsuit against someone that they have not been affected by.
 
Top