Texas makes a law that aborted fetuses have to be buried.

[Revoltingest]

Only one way to settle it.

No.
Let's bring out the big guns....

 

[Acim]

Zealous regulation by Texas, therefore can't readily support this. The ongoing debate is ideological, and need not resort to such tactics, IMO.

Yet, because zealous regulations exist elsewhere (i.e. with regards to use of tobacco), then I do think turnabout is fair play. If we're going to undo the Texas law on burying / cremating fetal remains from abortions, then let's get rid of all zealous regulations. If little to no desire for that, then let this stand and let's move on.

 

[fantome profane]

Oh, come on....I was summoned by @columbus to continue his theme ...

More accurately you were baited by columbus, and you fell for it hook line and sinker.

 

[columbus]

More accurately you were baited by columbus, and you fell for it hook line and sinker.

Easy and fun.
Tom

 

[columbus]

Yet, because zealous regulations exist elsewhere (i.e. with regards to use of tobacco), then I do think turnabout is fair play.

What?
How is two wrongs fair? I'm not even sure which other overzealous regulations you are referring to. Child labor laws? Zoning regs? Banking laws? Speed limits?
What do you think are comparable regulations?
Tom

 

[Revoltingest]

More accurately you were baited by columbus, and you fell for it hook line and sinker.

That's another way to say it.
But I didn't fall....I jumped!

 

[habiru]

YIKES We just passed a law that aborted babies have to buried or cremated.

Heres the link. http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/af...r-buried/ar-AAkTqkH?li=AA4ZnC&ocid=spartandhp

That is the only way to stop Planned Parenthood from selling the babies parts and organs. And that is to make sure that they cannot profit from these abortions. And they should make sure that the Federal government doesn't funds these abortions. But if they are worrying about these women rights, then they should do it for free of charge. But going around convincing women to abort their unborn child so that they can get tich from the dead child, should be illegal.

 

[idav]

That is the only way to stop Planned Parenthood from selling the babies parts and organs. And that is to make sure that they cannot profit from these abortions. And they should make sure that the Federal government doesn't funds these abortions. But if they are worrying about these women rights, then they should do it for free of charge. But going around convincing women to abort their unborn child so that they can get tich from the dead child, should be illegal.

There are already federal laws preventing stuff like that, including not funding abortions except in cases of rape and incest, or medical need.

 

[Revoltingest]

There are already federal laws preventing stuff like that, including not funding abortions except in cases of rape and incest, or medical need.

The age old question....
If abortion is wrong because a child is killed, why does it become OK
to "murder" a child solely because the parents were "kiss'n cousins"?

 

[idav]

The age old question....
If abortion is wrong because a child is killed, why does it become OK
to "murder" a child solely because the parents were "kiss'n cousins"?

Well I think if they want to outlaw it they need to give fetuses rights, I wouldn't be opposed to making it 5 months perhaps but hard to draw a line on thing like that. Could be a question for medical experts to determine viability. Besides In regards to kissing cousins, it could be due that the incest is also rape in cases of molestation.

 

[Revoltingest]

...it could be due that the incest is also rape in cases of molestation.

But what of incest which isn't molestation or rape?
And is it OK to "murder" a child just because one parent raped the other?
One's rights shouldn't be lost because of actions by others.

 

[idav]

But what of incest which isn't molestation or rape?
And is it OK to "murder" a child just because one parent raped the other?
One's rights shouldn't be lost because of actions by others.

I personally am not particular about reasons for abortion but we can't abort a viable baby perhaps even at five months with current technology.

 

[idav]

But what of incest which isn't molestation or rape?
And is it OK to "murder" a child just because one parent raped the other?
One's rights shouldn't be lost because of actions by others.

I think the law is trying to cover extenuating circumstances can be covered by federal funds otherwise should come out of your own pocket.

 

[Revoltingest]

I think the law is trying to cover extenuating circumstances can be covered by federal funds otherwise should come out of your own pocket.

Oh, there are circumstances behind the various compromises.
But I just wonder what the anti-abortion types think of these queries.

 

[Acim]

What?
How is two wrongs fair?

Is turnabout fair play?

I'm not even sure which other overzealous regulations you are referring to. Child labor laws? Zoning regs? Banking laws? Speed limits?

I thought what I put in parenthesis made it fairly clearly what I was referencing as overzealous regulations.

What do you think are comparable regulations?

The ones that are zealous, the ones that keep pushing and pushing and pushing on a particular area for policies that seek to eliminate a behavior from the face of humanity. Those are the ones I see as comparable (in that regard).

 

[Twilight Hue]

YIKES We just passed a law that aborted babies have to buried or cremated.

Heres the link. http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/af...r-buried/ar-AAkTqkH?li=AA4ZnC&ocid=spartandhp

It's a good thing. Cremation especially.

Bio material can become infectious.

 

[columbus]

It's a good thing. Cremation especially.

Bio material can become infectious.

No it isn't, it's a mean spirited effort to get their way without bothering with the process. Nobody is requiring the same standards for diseased livers or contaminated blood. No other bio materials at all. This is not about safety.
Tom

 

[Milton Platt]

YIKES We just passed a law that aborted babies have to buried or cremated.

Heres the link. http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/af...r-buried/ar-AAkTqkH?li=AA4ZnC&ocid=spartandhp

Or they can be cremated. AKA burned up. So what qualifies as cremation in this state? does burning them in a pit in the backyard qualify? Not trying to gross people out......but burning is burning, isn't it?

 

[Lighthouse]

I am looking for a reason to care about the corpse.
I very much oppose elective abortion. But the only reason I see for this legislation is to make life difficult for mothers.
Trying to do and end run around RvW. I don't like RvW, but it is just as much law as the Electoral College.
The problem we pro-lifers have is that the USA is not a pro-life country or culture. That is what needs fixing. Not making life difficult for people who follow the law of the land. That is wienie BS.
Tom

In my opinion, many just aren't pro-conscience anymore. Too many sick and twisted people with no care for life, cold-hearted, deceived into thinking medical research is so valuable when people just keep getting sicker, while the elite bank.

The problem also that some pro-lifers have are they just feed into the chaos, applaud irresponsibility, praise trillion dollars industries that would love nothing more for them to be sick.

There are just too many sick instances, such as this: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rrors-abortion-clinic-investigated-Texas.html

One of the many.

 

[Lighthouse]

That is the only way to stop Planned Parenthood from selling the babies parts and organs. And that is to make sure that they cannot profit from these abortions. And they should make sure that the Federal government doesn't funds these abortions. But if they are worrying about these women rights, then they should do it for free of charge. But going around convincing women to abort their unborn child so that they can get tich from the dead child, should be illegal.

The last thing they care for are women's rights, expendable life that's not their own. Great disguise though that have so many fooled.