gnomon
Well-Known Member
It's only been across major newspapers, news sites, NPR and pretty much everywhere with the ACLU filing multiple lawsuits over the last two years to get the administration to own up to the drone strikes in Pakistan, Yemen, Afghanistan, etc. The strikes started up in 2004 but were increased in activity and conducted covertly after he took over.
If we believe the CIA every drone stroke has hit only a few dozen high level targets or bottom level fighters. If we believe the Pakistanis innocents are being killed by the dozens of strikes going on year after year. The CIA halted the program after they killed two dozen Pakistani soldiers. They were definitely not Al-Qaeda.
The actual use of the word terrorist is a misnomer in this war at this point. The presence of Al-Qaeda, the one group we were after, is minimal and has been for a long time in that area. What is in that area are multiple groups who didn't give a damn about the U.S. but have been fighting against each other for some time. However, our policy has taken all of them and wrapped them up in one big bundle called terrorist.
If this program is nothing but a 100% guarantee hit against terrorists, is useful in keeping soldiers alive and no innocents are harmed why isn't it being touted out in the open like it should be?
However, if the CIA is claiming not to hurt innocents with these strikes yet had to stop the program to improve relations with Pakistan after killing two dozen of their soldiers.....
I'm sorry, sounds like continued indiscriminate ******** to me when we probably don't need to be over there at all.
If we believe the CIA every drone stroke has hit only a few dozen high level targets or bottom level fighters. If we believe the Pakistanis innocents are being killed by the dozens of strikes going on year after year. The CIA halted the program after they killed two dozen Pakistani soldiers. They were definitely not Al-Qaeda.
The actual use of the word terrorist is a misnomer in this war at this point. The presence of Al-Qaeda, the one group we were after, is minimal and has been for a long time in that area. What is in that area are multiple groups who didn't give a damn about the U.S. but have been fighting against each other for some time. However, our policy has taken all of them and wrapped them up in one big bundle called terrorist.
If this program is nothing but a 100% guarantee hit against terrorists, is useful in keeping soldiers alive and no innocents are harmed why isn't it being touted out in the open like it should be?
However, if the CIA is claiming not to hurt innocents with these strikes yet had to stop the program to improve relations with Pakistan after killing two dozen of their soldiers.....
I'm sorry, sounds like continued indiscriminate ******** to me when we probably don't need to be over there at all.