Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Arrow said:My question is this: If God never told Adam and Eve to touch the tree, could they have ever sinned?
Arrow said:My question is this: If God never told Adam and Eve to touch the tree, could they have ever sinned?
Yes He did; how else would they have known if it was forbidden or not?dawny0826 said:He didn't tell Adam and Eve to touch the tree.
He gave them free will. And they chose to give into temptation and carry out the forbidden.
finalfrogo said:Yes He did; how else would they have known if it was forbidden or not?
Arrow said:My question is this: If God never told Adam and Eve to touch the tree, could they have ever sinned?
Arrow said:Then if the only law at that time was do not eat of that tree, then how did Satan sin? Where there is good, there has to be law, right?
I agree that she was disobedient, but I don't believe that her disobedience was sinful. Sin is the voluntary transgression of a moral law or religious principle. Until she understood the difference between good and evil, she was not capable of sinning. I see her as being in much the same situation as a three-year-old child whose mother says, "Don't touch the stove. It's hot!" The child touches the stove anyway and is burned. He disobeyed his mother and must pay the consequences, but he can hardly be said to be guilty of sinning at that age. He can only be guilty of disobedience. As he gets older and comes to understand that it is wrong to disobey his mother, he becomes able to sin.Sasa said:She knew because God told them not to eat from the tree. It was about Obeying God.
I disgree. I'll go along with the idea that they weren't "sinning" until they knew the difference between good and evil, but God did tell them not to eat the fruit, and He did tell them what would happen to them if they disobeyed. So how was He "unfair" by enforcing the punishment He had warned them of?gnostic said:The Genesis' Tree of Knowledge and the punishment of Adam and Eve are illogical. It is not just or fair that God would punish them before they know right from wrong.
Well, I just got through agreeing with you, so what's your point?gnostic said:Would you able to tell right from wrong without eating the fruit, if you were in the same situation as Eve when she met the serpent, Katzpur? Would you be able to tell if what the serpent telling you to be able true or not?
I don't think so. I don't think you would fare any better than Eve.
For that matter, how do you tell God was tellling the truth or not, without knowledge of right and wrong?
You can't.
Personally, I think you're splitting hairs. It is only by being able to recognize and understand both good and evil that one can begin to choose between them. Everything has its opposite and it is impossible to know what "good" is without also knowing what "evil" is. Just as darkness is the absence of light, evil is the absence of good. Without having experienced darkness, one cannot know what light is, even if he has already experienced light. The same is true of good and evil.Sasa said:Okay, I believe I found the answer. Adam and Eve did know right from wrong. Look at this passage:
"No! You will not die," the serpent said to the woman. "In fact, God knows that when you eat it your eyes will be opened and you will be like God, knowing good and evil." Genesis 3:4-5
It says "Knowing good and evil"... not "Knowing good FROM evil."
All Adam and Eve had known thusfar was good and when they ate from the tree, their eyes were opened to evil as well.
Now that make much more sense. That's what I have been trying to say. How can Adam and Eve distinguish between right and wrong, without eating the fruit?Katzpur said:Personally, I think you're splitting hairs. It is only by being able to recognize and understand both good and evil that one can begin to choose between them.