Skreeper
Member
You remind me of a certain user who used to spend a lot of time arguing against homosexuality. He also cited the CDC for his arguments, the problem was he drew the wrong conclusions from the CDC data.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That Whole Homosexual--Sin Thing
- Thread starter Skwim
- Start date
You remind me of a certain user who used to spend a lot of time arguing against homosexuality. He also cited the CDC for his arguments, the problem was he drew the wrong conclusions from the CDC data.
Skreeper
Member
They have faith about that.
I have read about it but I wondered.
Maybe this disease existed way before that.
You know how homosexual sex is.
The P is inserted to A
A is a very very dirty part
It is where the ____ happens.
And when that happens
Both A and P becomes a living laboratory
View attachment 29085
Both became a walking petridish.
Most likely Alexander the Great had it
And the pervert men of Rome got it too.
You have a very weird view on how gay people like me have sex. And if your A is a "very very dirty part" then I suggest using some soap.
Terry Sampson
Well-Known Member
And THAT is why TRUE, APPROVED, and CERTIFIED CHRISTIANS, all over the world today, do not engage in sexual intercourse [and all activities leading to said intercourse] until both spouses in a marriage, are ready to procreate. They don't engage in sex until they are married nor during marriage if either partner has a headache, doesn't want kids, or is incapable of being fruitful and multiplying. [And they don't call in pinch-hitters.]
Last edited:
One of the crazier posts on this topic!
wellwisher
Well-Known Member
It has to do with the cause affect between behavior and the creation of social diseases. In modern times, we have all types social mops to prevent and clean up disease. Back when the bible was written, they did not have these things, since they did not have modern science Rather they had to figure out how to deal with the natural cause and affects, between certain forms of behavior, and the creation of disease.
Maybe modern culture could run an experiment for one year to simulate the bible times. We take away all modern prosthetic mops, created by science and medicine, that are used to mop up, after behavior that causes disease.
With all the mops gone, let everyone do their thing and we will monitor disease and attrition rates, to determine which types behavior have the least problems, and which types of behavior have the most problems. This brings us back to bible times and the choices that had to be made to prevent cultures from being wiped out by deadly social diseases. The least problems will be male and female married couples. They will become immune to each other even under less than clean conditions.
In modern times, we can use science to cheat natural cause and affect. This creates a false sense of natural. For example, if you ate rocks this would cause all types of medical problems. On the other hand, say we had medical treatments, in place, for tooth repair and well as all the internal medicine procedures needed to eat rocks. This could become a new fad. It could also sold as natural, since chickens eat rocks.
The medical illusion will convince many this is natural, for a price. To see through the illusion, you need to get rid of the prosthesis, and let nature run its course.
In the bible, lesbian behavior is not given the same treatment as gay behavior, since this does not form as much disease. Natural cause and affect between disease and behavior was the bible standard. The king with many wives, would not sin, if his wives found affection with each other; disease was controlled.
The atheist POV, makes use of the medical and science illusions, which once in place, can compensate for the natural cause and affect. If humans can create good enough mops, is dirtying the floor, as bad as it used to be in the bible? The answer has to do whether natural is important, or whether artificial is good enough.
Terry Sampson
Well-Known Member
One of the crazier posts on this topic!
There are, to the best of my knowledge, four Christian subsets: {True Christians, Pseudo-Christians, Quasi-Christians, Eclectic Christians}.
Eclectic Christians, such as myself, are typically referred to as Heretics by the first three subsets.
Because you disagree with my previous statement, I infer that you are either a Pseudo-Christian or a Quasi-Christian.
I've got $50 that says you're the former.
Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
Where to begin?the A is a very very dirty place
View attachment 29086
If a man inserts his P to the A
such as in a homosexual sex
He is bound to hit something.....
Well...
a. homosexual sex is not necessarily anal sex
b. roughly half of all homosexuals don't have a penis
c. heterosexuals have anal sex too
d. if you can't even bring yourself to use words like "penis" and "anus" I humbly suggest this discussion is not for you. If YOU find the topic disgusting, no one is asking you to participate in the discussion, and certainly no one is asking you to participate in any of the activities being discussed. But hey, I'm sure YOU do things that I would find disgusting and want to post childish gifs about, but that doesn't give me any right to try to stop you from doing them.
MJFlores
Well-Known Member
Did I get it right?
It was meant for another function
Doing it there, is an improper use of the system.
That is why the Bible says homosexual sex is detestable and an abomination
Leviticus 18:22 New International Version (NIV)
“‘Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable.
Excuse me....
MJFlores
Well-Known Member
My reaction to your items a to c
The world really has changed for the worse
On item d - I don't want to use words which are rated R
I don't know if there are children or minors around
Or people who are not matured enough to understand those words
Hence I exercise proper decorum in observance to house rules.
P and A - would deemed appropriate.
Skwim
Veteran Member
Yeah, marriage is certainly a heterosexual convenience isn't it.
Develop a heterosexual orientation and you get perks.
Develop a homosexual orientation and you get penalized.
Too bad god doesn't see fit to extend the opportunity to homosexuals. Why do you suppose this is?
.
Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
If you aren't capable of having an adult conversation using proper terms in appropriate ways, no one's forcing you to participate. Further resort to childish gifs doesn't lend your position any further credence, though. Again, no one's forcing you to participate in activities or discussion you find objectionable. If you are so off put by them, I suggest you stop trying to involve yourself in conversations about them. Childish GIFs and pearl clutching wowserism over language aside, my points stand.
MJFlores
Well-Known Member
So serious.
Why are we so serious.
We are here to determine if the whole homosexual thing is really a sin.
Showed you my justification - and it is really detestable not only to me but also to God
Sorry for being squeamish - I'm really squeamish to openly write about thing that smell "manure"
Ekkkkkk!
Skreeper
Member
Did I get it right?
It was meant for another function
Doing it there, is an improper use of the system.
View attachment 29093
That is why the Bible says homosexual sex is detestable and an abomination
Leviticus 18:22 New International Version (NIV)
“‘Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable.
Excuse me....
Uh-huh. Maybe you should ask your creator why he put the prostate where the sun don't shine.
Meanwhile, I am just gonna continue doing that vile P to A thing. Don't puke too much, that can't be healthy.
Yes, but you see, that's just your belief. I don't happen to belief in the existence of a "Lord." And nothing in the world -- or out of it -- has ever been presented to me to make even the smallest case for such a thing.
Good for you. Stick to your guns, even when, Finklestein aside, the vast majority of people who ACTUALLY DO THE WORK AND THE RESEARCH have found otherwise. After all, what's hard work and research when you've got baseless beliefs?
Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
Yes, funny how the design argument opponents to homosexuality never seem to mention the fact that there are sexually responsive nerve endings located in the anus, given their myopic fixation on male-male anal sex.
Spartan
Well-Known Member
Perhaps you didn't read the evidence for Sodom and Gomorrah being found.
Excerpt: "When the archaeological, geographical and epigraphic evidence is reviewed in detail, it is clear that the infamous cities of Sodom and Gomorrah have now been found. What is more, this evidence demonstrates that the Bible provides an accurate eyewitness account of events that occurred southeast of the Dead Sea over 4,000 years ago."
Associates for Biblical Research - The Discovery of the Sin Cities of Sodom and Gomorrah
You must be male.
Few women would be interested in returning to the days when they had no rights, contraceptives, or pre-natal care. When ugly deaths in child birth were common and child mortality rates topped 50%.
Yuck!
Tom
BilliardsBall
Veteran Member
I'll believe you and the OP are fighters against injustice when:
* You stand for the millions of babies slaughtered under Roe v. Wade
* You loudly protest Christians martyred in the many thousands in the Sudan and elsewhere
* You stop assaulting fundamentalists, a persecuted and discriminated-against minority group on this forum and in America
Did they find evidence that God is so not omnimax that He had to send scouts to find out what was really going on there?
Tom