• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Thatcher and Socialism

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
What does that mean?

According to our jurisprudence, it means that a wealthy entrepreneur cannot fire an employee without just cause, and it means that entrepreneurs' activities should never prevent the State from ensuring each worker a dignified life.
 

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
No, because their success hurts no one and helps many.

That's not true across the board, and many rich folks absolutely contribute to harmful impacts on society, whether it's profiting off crime, exploiting workers, exploiting resources and polluting, or exploiting consumers with harmful products.

Some never even gained their wealth through hard work.

Our concern should be to help those who do not currently have enough for a good quality of life.

It should be, which requires resources that the rich have in overabundance.
 

Altfish

Veteran Member
Maybe it is time to acknowledge that there are financial and banking elites who work behind the scenes 24/7, in order to dismantle the Nation States of Europe.

Because a united Europe (and not divisive) is invincible. European countries, are weak alone.
Wow!

Us Remainers have been saying this for ever... What was it called "Project Fear"

Well done for admitting you were wrong
 

ronki23

Well-Known Member
The income tax rate in the UK before Maggie ranged from 33% base rate to 98% marginal.

On average people paid 44% of their income in tax. Now ? The income tax rate now is 20 to 45%. She literally halved the income tax.

Before Thatcher it cost £6 for a bag of coal when the taxpayer already paid £8 to the miners: on top of that it cost another £2 because of the trade unions. £16 for a bag of coal when it could be imported from elsewhere for as little as £3!

The reason our tax was so high was because the unions were holding the country to ransom: they were simply unwilling to work. See the " Winter of Discontent " when people couldn't afford to heat their homes or when the binmen refused to clean the streets


The North of England, Scotland and Wales were already declining and dragging down the Midlands and the South. If you have cancer then you amputate the tumour to save the body.

She won 3 General elections in a row with 43.9% of the total vote in 1979 , 42.4% (27.6% for Labour LOL) in 1983 and 42.2% in 1987.

She kicked the Labour party's behind and it took Tony Blair (and Gordon Brown) moving Labour to the centre in order for them to get re-elected. Honestly, the only reason Labour won in 1997 onwards was because John Major was a crap Prime Minister who was whipped by the EU: Thatcher was ousted by the Europhile Tories. If New Labour isn't 'true' Labour then why couldn't Corbyn (Old Labour) win an election ?


She will be missed dearly

 
Top