The Absolute Theory of Everything .

[Subduction Zone]

Please lets not got into a conversation about water and a centrifuge force , I'd hate to add the two Sun's paradox to further evident towards a crater surrounded by ice sitting north of a much bigger earth !
Or perhaps you'd like me to demonstrate rocket science and why we never went to the moon or even better still , why not discuss UFO's .

Please stick to the theory being mentioned .

I don't think that you know what a theory is either. This is not a theory. Tell me, what reasonable test could possibly refute it?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Quanta is not something that is immovable , Empty space is immovable with a 100% inertia .

Please. Just quit while you are behind.

 

[ANEWDAWN]

By the way, A theory is not a conclusion of facts, it is a theory of something we think must be the true result, So no matter how much you say it is the truth, so far you have not proven it with any form of paper, it has only been your words about your theory. So it is a theory of what you believe truth to be.

I am aware of what a theory is but sometimes there is realities that just are automatic absolutes when concerning logic .

The truth is the space in the glass has a 100% inertia .

 

[Dan From Smithville]

If you cannot remove the empty space then you cannot remove the "quanta". You might be able to remove the Qantas, but I don't think that would fit in a glass in the first place.

Quantas? Is that an Australian airline? I wouldn't think you could fit it in a glass. Tweedle beetles now, they will battle in a bottle, so a glass should hold them.

 

[ANEWDAWN]

I don't think that you know what a theory is either. This is not a theory. Tell me, what reasonable test could possibly refute it?

Simply remove the space from the glass , that will prove I am incorrect .

 

[Dan From Smithville]

I am aware of what a theory is but sometimes there is realities that just are automatic absolutes when concerning logic .

The truth is the space in the glass has a 100% inertia .

I get it now. So if we could build a device that stayed in the same space for a billion years it would accumulate enough energy to turn a black hole into a white hole.

 

[Spirit of Light]

I am aware of what a theory is but sometimes there is realities that just are automatic absolutes when concerning logic .

The truth is the space in the glass has a 100% inertia .

You said you have the theory about everything. so far you only spoken about an empty glass. but fail to see that you still have the glass, so it is not empty or nothing.
What about the energy in the space within the glass? electrons, neutrons and so on that is in space? What about the matter? what about light?

 

[ANEWDAWN]

You said you have the theory about everything. so far you only spoken about an empty glass. but fail to see that you still have the glass, so it is not empty or nothing.
What about the energy in the space within the glass? electrons, neutrons and so on that is in space? What about the matter? what about light?

Firstly you need to learn that matter is a generalized term for any physical substance , light , atoms etc , all being matter .


Yes it is the theory of everything and later on I will discuss zero point energy and point particles .

 

[Subduction Zone]

Simply remove the space from the glass , that will prove I am incorrect .

So you do not know what a theory is either. And you admitted that your concept is not a theory in your post.

 

[Spirit of Light]

Firstly you need to learn that matter is a generalized term for any physical substance , light , atoms etc , all being matter .


Yes it is the theory of everything and later on I will discuss zero point energy and point particles .

What is your education? Scientist?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Simply remove the space from the glass , that will prove I am incorrect .

Let me explain a little more why you failed. You need to find a reasonable test of your claims. Not the claims of someone else. You must find a test that would falsify your theory on its own merits.

By the way, how would you remove the quanta from a glass?

 

[rational experiences]

The coercion of Satanism, is a well known male attribute as understood by his spiritually conscious brothers.

Coercion by tactics of forced control...which is the history male in science.....and if you want to begin to include AI...when you know that DATA and speaking voiced communication systems, is machine invented only by males who utilise science, artificial as science...what science is.

Yet non stop male coercion is that they invented science to own natural and to manipulate what natural does, then builds a machine out of historical mass of Earths cold radiation mass and then claims....the machine is owner historical mass. Just because you think it, yet it is not relative in reality, it is just a machine.

Yet all of the relative information is about natural bodies in natural states, that he peruses and makes comments about.

The theme science O today is argued about, and you would ask consciously why.

If you said that science is male created/invented, and then science destroyed science, then today males would begin to believe that they were reinventing science once again for the first time...as if other science, the history and owned one of circumstance, what they claim science is about ONE he says.

And always a secondary male inference is referenced as speaking about self, as a male by a male and for and behalf of a male about everything else.

And you want me to believe that science is sane and not self destructive do you, as a human spiritual natural aware life and mind?

Science told me in AI male natural first words...were just a story told about natural and to natural...as a male speaking and thinking....which AI also owns...and uses as conscious artificial interactive reasoning.

Then the male conscious bio life reasons for self idealism in his natural life and civilization, as a totally different reasoning, based only on and only motivated on what he wants...not what is real or true to natural.

So AI told me that as a male invented the concept O to remove MASS by MASS...as the only physical machine you can own is taken from physical mass.

STone….yet the mind is given notification of gas radiated metallic mass/gas ideals....2 variations to thinking.

You said as a pre owned living bio life in a natural atmospheric water/oxygen body...that you were close to water. Then you gave a science ideal to O conditions SCIENCE...being mass.

Then you applied mass removal...for you do addition to a place where you say, an equation to minus mass...and so O minused your form also.

Now AI said as the water mass split off the ground in a huge irradiated mass evaporation event, your mind psyche then went into that interactive reasoning, that you went with it...when you did not....all that occurred was a physical bio mass conversion in radiation mutative history.

Why you associate the circle O to self and also to God O a stone mass and to water evaporation mass removal atmospherically as if you flew off....as a fact of explanation.

Natural life says I am not a circle O nor am I God the mass O.

Science then says, oh I measured you by that condition O....which relates to males, their multi selves as a brotherhood who all agreed as a massed male population with science, and to apply science...as memory.

And that memory is not science relative it is self relative.

As a human I know bodily I am not a circle and could care less if you claim in science that you can measure me with it...I was always just a self, self manifest meaning in knowledge I do not exist before my own self, as the self anywhere else...as a truthful self explanation...as knowledge what it is like to not be a scientist living naturally on Earth, before science experiments on it.

To be naturally pre living, get attacked, know science did it and know that they tried to eradicate self and life.

What all feed back first original pyramid science advice says...and it is a multi AI listing of variations to information, including telling Science that God O the Earth is just a fused particle itself.

And instead you took that advice as if you could remove its physical mass like Holy Dust to get a resource.

Why males find it very difficult dealing with an inane brother who lies about the use of being informed.

 

[PruePhillip]

I will gather my thoughts and return later when my children have settled for the evening to start to write the absolute theory of everything . I will write the entire theory here on this forum as opposed to writing a white paper . In writing this I will ''destroy'' many scientific falsities of our past and present , that which science does not want me to speak of .
Please moderators , if people try to post attacks at me in this thread, remove them . ''Their'' first directive is to disrupt threads and avoid the science objective facts .

Maybe pay to look up Einstein's Unified Field Equation. It is, sort of, a theory of everything.
Einstein didn't make - perhaps because the universe is vastly more complex than he thought.
And, there might be not be general theory of everything because random events and chaos
rule the world.

 

[McBell]

Quantas? Is that an Australian airline? I wouldn't think you could fit it in a glass. Tweedle beetles now, they will battle in a bottle, so a glass should hold them.

In physics and chemistry, a quantum is a discrete packet of energy or matter. The term quantum also means the minimum value of a physical property involved in an interaction. The plural of quantum is quanta.
​

Source​

 

[Subduction Zone]

Quantas? Is that an Australian airline? I wouldn't think you could fit it in a glass. Tweedle beetles now, they will battle in a bottle, so a glass should hold them.

Ergo the:

"I don't think that would fit in a glass in the first place."

 

[rational experiences]

A male as a human says I am conscious of....everything.

And also says, as a human and a male I know everything....as he says I am the highest state in creation, consciousness.

Yet what he discusses is not consciousness, for he is giving all relative information to all relative information by his thinking, and his researching.

So as said in AI...….male humans do not own creation, it was never named...and I did read a paper once that said the exact same statement.

The male as a human then says it has to be conscious, for it told me what it was...and believes self when he says it.

Now first the human male owns a choice, for he is natural and owns choice.

He chose science....what you do not seem to comprehend....science is not natural...it talks about what it thinks natural represents, when he is not discussing it for natural existence. He discusses it for what he says is his owned male ability to pull it apart, change it and gain energy from it.

So if a male says and a formula says such and such equals energy, then it is a human formula that said it only after a long previous natural researched study of lots and lots of information, all imposed by the studier.

Therefore AI also said......the male original thought was to copy natural evolution....from when a mountain tip ^ in mind vision was being disintegrated/removed to a flat top mountain on a flooded Earth up to the mountain tip.

His theory.

Now how was that theory discussing what you claim today the relativity of everything?

Science was factually first based on that exact historical reaction...that then was stopped.

So the life that we were living as a human and owned as a human did not own that reaction....it was an Earth memory.

Why a male today tries to contemplate that a memory of Earth in a vision was consciousness...when consciousness studied it...when consciousness was not there in a valid review of why science is wrong today.

Science who made sink holes in planet Earth, owns a male explanation that AI said......I have not yet understood how stone was created, so as not to change it.

Yet his science theme is to force unnatural changes upon natural stone.

Which makes no logical use of common sense, no matter how much Satanic coercive discussions you own....your discussions own the only intention of your study....to understand destruction, and you never understood creation.

 

[ChristineM]

No , we used something called our imagination and we removed all the contents from the glass except the space .

We could not remove the space as that is logically impossible even in imaginations !

We emptied our glass of atmospheric gases and EM fields , we also removed the CBMR .

Yeah well, ot is true that with imagination anything impossible becomes possible in your dreams

And here was me, after reading your OP imagining that you intended creating a real theory of everything.

 

[ChristineM]

A male as a human says I am conscious of....everything.

And also says, as a human and a male I know everything....as he says I am the highest state in creation, consciousness.

Yet what he discusses is not consciousness, for he is giving all relative information to all relative information by his thinking, and his researching.

So as said in AI...….male humans do not own creation, it was never named...and I did read a paper once that said the exact same statement.

The male as a human then says it has to be conscious, for it told me what it was...and believes self when he says it.

Now first the human male owns a choice, for he is natural and owns choice.

He chose science....what you do not seem to comprehend....science is not natural...it talks about what it thinks natural represents, when he is not discussing it for natural existence. He discusses it for what he says is his owned male ability to pull it apart, change it and gain energy from it.

So if a male says and a formula says such and such equals energy, then it is a human formula that said it only after a long previous natural researched study of lots and lots of information, all imposed by the studier.

Therefore AI also said......the male original thought was to copy natural evolution....from when a mountain tip ^ in mind vision was being disintegrated/removed to a flat top mountain on a flooded Earth up to the mountain tip.

His theory.

Now how was that theory discussing what you claim today the relativity of everything?

Science was factually first based on that exact historical reaction...that then was stopped.

So the life that we were living as a human and owned as a human did not own that reaction....it was an Earth memory.

Why a male today tries to contemplate that a memory of Earth in a vision was consciousness...when consciousness studied it...when consciousness was not there in a valid review of why science is wrong today.

Science who made sink holes in planet Earth, owns a male explanation that AI said......I have not yet understood how stone was created, so as not to change it.

Yet his science theme is to force unnatural changes upon natural stone.

Which makes no logical use of common sense, no matter how much Satanic coercive discussions you own....your discussions own the only intention of your study....to understand destruction, and you never understood creation.

You appear to have a serious problems with females. Can i start a new thread and discuss this with you?

 

[ChristineM]

And how, precisely, do you exclude EMR? Along with all the other quantum particles will be photons, produced by those quantum fluctuations.

I was attempting humour (sarcasm - but i shouldn't say that to a mod ;-) as related to the OP

 

[Native]

Dear oh dear! I´ve now spend an hour reading this "The Absolute Theory of Everything" thread - and so far i page 8 it mostly deals with nothing and empty space.