leov
Well-Known Member
Yrs, but I understand now that not everyone is capable processing that information.So, I take that as a yes?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yrs, but I understand now that not everyone is capable processing that information.So, I take that as a yes?
Sure, be an ******* and keep the truth all to yourself.
If you were 100% certain that you knew the absolute truth, about God, the creation of the universe, what happens after death, etc...
Would you feel that any action necessary to get this truth out to the rest of the world would be justified?
actually I mean what I wrote about religions. but I understand that most people reject religions, and so I can understand your objection. and i really liked your respond that negated my post. maybe im not that smart i guess. i give the wrong impressionsOk, sorry-ah, missed your ironical sarcasm
in the post to which I said "right" to.
Sure, be an ******* and keep the truth all to yourself.
The only way this could be true would be if I was God. No chance.
actually I mean what I wrote about religions. but I understand that most people reject religions, and so I can understand your objection. and i really liked your respond that negated my post. maybe im not that smart i guess. i give the wrong impressions
So, God failed at getting the Truth out to the world?
(Assuming God)
Why do I reject religions, because IMO they haven't been able to justify the Truth they promote. At least not the folks who lead them.
If I couldn't actually demonstrate that truth to anyone else, and knew that I couldn't... then I'd likely keep it to myself... even if I knew for certain. There would be no point in sharing some specific, detailed account of what "God" is or what He does - since no one is compelled to believe me - just as all theists find themselves in that position now.If you were 100% certain that you knew the absolute truth, about God, the creation of the universe, what happens after death, etc...
Would you feel that any action necessary to get this truth out to the rest of the world would be justified?
I do know the answer to life, the universe and everything.
But you wouldn't like it.
I don't like it, it makes me depressed.
If you were 100% certain that you knew the absolute truth, about God, the creation of the universe, what happens after death, etc...
Would you feel that any action necessary to get this truth out to the rest of the world would be justified?
I do know the answer to life, the universe and everything.
But you wouldn't like it.
I don't like it, it makes me depressed.
I feel there's truths but no absolute truth. I feel like absolute truth is an overly black and white way of thinking.
I do know the answer to life, the universe and everything.
But you wouldn't like it.
I don't like it, it makes me depressed.
I feel there's truths but no absolute truth. I feel like absolute truth is an overly black and white way of thinking.
From the fallible human perspective the Baha'i Faith does not propose that the knowledge of 'Truth' is the reality of human existence. The reality is evolving knowledge, and religions are relative knowledge in the context of human culture at the time they were revealed. Those that believe in ancient world religions live in contradiction of their claims of 'Truth' out of context of the reality of the evolving nature of humanity, and the context of what we know of the universal perspective in the contemporary world.