• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The battle of evolution vs creationism

gnostic

The Lost One
but that doesn't mean God didn't hand a fingerprint in the effort....

oh! that's right......no fingerprints on God...

Perhaps, because there are "no God".

Have you ever thought, that maybe, just maybe that God is not real?

Right, you are, there are no fingerprints of God, but there have no evidences of God ever existing, other than what are written by these so-called "prophet" or so-called "apostle", who apparently believe in his existence, despite never seeing him.

That's called "faith"...and a blind one at that...and superstition. Such books (scriptures) relying on faith alone, clearly aren't reliable sources.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Perhaps, because there are "no God".

Have you ever thought, that maybe, just maybe that God is not real?

Right, you are, there are no fingerprints of God, but there have no evidences of God ever existing, other than what are written by these so-called "prophet" or so-called "apostle", who apparently believe in his existence, despite never seeing him.

That's called "faith"...and a blind one at that...and superstition. Such books (scriptures) relying on faith alone, clearly aren't reliable sources.
and you need to hear that science would have you believe...
substance is not self motivating

'Something' had to set the universe in motion

and that garden event has a lot of science under the terms given
 

gnostic

The Lost One
only denial to those who deny a Greater Life
A "Greater Life" to what exactly?

A so-called promise of afterlife, or to live forever?

It is a pipe-dream, based on nothing more than hear-say of some unrealistic utopia.

Sorry, but I don't find heaven to be at all appealing. And I don't want immortality or to live forever, and I don't find it any more attractive than hell.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
A "Greater Life" to what exactly?

A so-called promise of afterlife, or to live forever?

It is a pipe-dream, based on nothing more than hear-say of some unrealistic utopia.

Sorry, but I don't find heaven to be at all appealing. And I don't want immortality or to live forever, and I don't find it any more attractive than hell.
oh well......
 

gnostic

The Lost One
and you need to hear that science would have you believe...
substance is not self motivating
I am not looking for "belief" in science.

Belief is useless in science. Science is about understanding nature or understanding technology.

Science is merely a tool.

About 20 years ago, I was a civil engineer. Science allow for me to build better buildings, better roads or better bridges. It helps me to do my work.

Science is not a belief system, not unless you talking about philosophy of science.

Philosophies might have some merits or values, but they are nothing more than just talk. Philosophy focused mostly on the WHY and even on the WHO.

And religion is even more useless than philosophy. It is mainly focused on the WHO, like God, and if you are a Christian, on Jesus.

Can God or Jesus design, build or test a bridge for me?

Praying certainly won't help me to design or build the bridge.

Actual science is about acquiring knowledge, acquiring data, testing or finding evidences, so that we ca make better decision on any project. Unlike philosophy, science focused on WHAT and the HOW questions.

Science is about WHAT it is, WHAT can be done, and HOW to do it.

It just think it is plain stupid for anyone to mix religion and science together, because they are nothing alike.
 
Last edited:

Thief

Rogue Theologian
What is it about, then?
Man was formed to in turn form spirit
each occasion the body produces a unique person

the will to live will in turn bring you to your greatest desire....
in the hour of your last breath
you will desire to stand up

I suggest you go for it

and hopefully you will have made some consideration what happens shortly after

God and heaven will come to see....what stands from the dust
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
I am not looking for "belief" in science.

Belief is useless in science. Science is about understanding nature or understanding technology.

Science is merely a tool.

About 20 years ago, I was a civil engineer. Science allow for me to build better buildings, better roads or better bridges. It helps me to do my work.

Science is not a belief system, not unless you talking about philosophy of science.

Philosophies might have some merits or values, but they are nothing more than just talk. Philosophy focused mostly on the WHY and even on the WHO.

And religion is even more useless than philosophy. It is mainly focused on the WHO, like God, and if you are a Christian, on Jesus.

Can God or Jesus design, build or test a bridge for me?

Praying certainly won't help me to design or build the bridge.

Actual science is about acquiring knowledge, acquiring data, testing or finding evidences, so that we ca make better decision on any project. Unlike philosophy, science focused on WHAT and the HOW questions.

Science is about WHAT it is, WHAT can be done, and HOW to do it.

It just think it is plain stupid for anyone to mix religion and science together, because they are nothing alike.
I concur for the most part.....
and I believe in God because of science

science will lead you to that 'point' of decision
it will not make the choice for you
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Man was formed to in turn form spirit
each occasion the body produces a unique person

the will to live will in turn bring you to your greatest desire....
in the hour of your last breath
you will desire to stand up

I suggest you go for it

and hopefully you will have made some consideration what happens shortly after

God and heaven will come to see....what stands from the dust
Not to be blunt, but that is what you believe (I assume). And that is all.

I have no reason to worry.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Not to be blunt, but that is what you believe (I assume). And that is all.

I have no reason to worry.
assumption is a tool...like any other cognitive device.

my side of the fence.....'assumes' .....a God
I do so for science

your side of the fence ....assumes ....otherwise

and I have only one worry
will I fit in to the scheme of peace in heaven

apparently....you're not going
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
assumption is a tool...like any other cognitive device.

my side of the fence.....'assumes' .....a God
Apparently.

That is not my way, though.

I do so for science

Thanks for the laugh.

your side of the fence ....assumes ....otherwise

and I have only one worry
will I fit in to the scheme of peace in heaven

apparently....you're not going
If it takes that for "going there", then it will be all right.
 
It occurred to me today how silly this is.

Evolution a scientific study
Creationism a philosophical study

The 2 are not even related so that they can be compared.

1)Biology Scientists need to make it clear that evolution has no bearing on the condition of God.

2)Religions need to make it clear that scientific studies are human studies.

If we want to teach both evolution and creationism they should be taught under there appropriate studies(Science or Philosophy). Evolution should never be brought up in a religious environment and Creationism should never be brought up is a scientific environment.

If Scientists and Religions make this clear we will no longer need this debate room. If Scientist just do their part we can call this room Creationism (Philosophy or Science)
No. It's not philosophy either.

It's creative narrative.
 
Top