Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Anyway I promise to be honest, direct and respectful and appeal to an angry poster as best I can. My IQ is 127; I can't just beat everyone intellectually but I feel that my position the aliens are the "Gods" of the Bible is strong. I'd like to hear what you think.
Souls from other planets may reincarnate on this planet if reasons dictate, and the reciprocal.I think you're right about Aliens being sometimes before and sometimes after us. I think we should both respect and protect our planet and don't forget to aim for the stars though. We can do both now.
The scriptures say nowhere that we have to evolve to a superhuman like Jesus before we can go to other planets.
On a political note, if we use nonrenewable less we both keep the earth for us freer from pollution and save energy for such space travel to be cheaper.
Souls from other planets may reincarnate on this planet if reasons dictate, and the reciprocal.
Leftist politics of the lowest evolved souls incarnate on the planet, who imagine they collectively know what is best for planetary evolution, are sadly retarding evolution by increasing the cost of energy to the majority mass of poor people thus preventing them a higher standard of living and depth of life experiences.
So long as each nation can independently decide what energy resource is best for them, no problem. But fwiw, those that have the cheapest energy production, all things being equal, will have the highest standard of living, and thus more prepared to develop space faring technologies. CO2 is not a pollutant, it is plant food so agricultural production is increased as it increases...it is a win win scenario.Yes but again I would refer to it non-mystically. Cellular plans can be uploaded onto a server and then a computer there or somewhere else can create a body and download us back into it. This is brand new science, but Rael said it a long time ago.
I guess being political means I am forced to be on the other side of someone... sorry.
You know I want people to live don't you?! But if we worked to save certain types of energy, the marginal costs of each step in space travel, including the first step of making sure we are safe before we take a step, decrease.
We will not run out of water for Oxygen and Hydrogen make excellent fuell for rocket propulsion systems....so no worries there!Regardless we need to preserve our nonrenewable energy for marginal trips to outer space and keeping our home ready.
As for earth, if we ran out of gasoline like I hear Saudi Arabia is right now or have a population problem like China hello war so one solution among many would be to unite nations and then use it sensibly.
I know that rocket fuel is different but we may be able to convert our nonrenewable energy to get a greater footing in space and not using non-renewables keep ourselves from blowing up here.
Coal fired electric power stations currently produce the cheapest electricity generation and so are the most popular, they are pretty clean these days wrt soot and other toxic pollution. Wrt to their CO2 emissions, as I explained CO2 is not a pollutant, it is not toxic nor visible, it is just that main stream media promotes the AGW fear campaign that global warming is caused by CO2 emissions contributed by humans and is going to bring catastrophic consequences. This claim is not true, and soon we will see the AGW industry severely defunded by the Trump administration.That's good to know!
Well I guess the only thing about fossil fuels to beware of (pollution is a problem but I don't think it will wipe out humanity) is that if a country is running out they may want to go to war.
Simply put, the debate is not about the change in temperatures, but what caused them. Climate change is natural, there never has been a period where temperature has not been changing, even during the course of 24 hours, there are substantial changes, and while human activity including urban heat does contribute a little, the natural contributions swamp the human CO2 contribution. Here is a graph of global temperatures over the last 10,000 years, check out the debate that follows in comments on the post of which it was a part.. Four Key Charts for a Climate Change SkepticFour Key Charts for a Climate Change SkepticActually, I can show you very easily that the climate change science is real!
Just check out https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/sloan-s...and-policy-spring-2008/lecture-notes/lec4.pdf
on pg. 4, the one that says "How have continental temperatures changed over the past century (1996-2005) and why?
It is impossible to come to a different conclusion!