Thank you for providing me alternative viewing.
I watched the first video. But again, I don't think astroturfing and climate science are a perfect fit. She may be trying to astro-turf the main stream from a minority post. I have been prescribed drugs that I knew from reading the ads had problems like loss of vision or other terrible things and I chose smart medicine instead - it must be smart because I've taken them for ten years and I am completely free of disease with good bio-stats. Also, I know they help me with my mental problems. As for whether climate scientists astro-turf, no I think they debate maturely. I'm sorry if I astro-turfed you about it myself though. I was a poor example but I did it only because I wanted to help you and thought I could snap you out of it quickly... something some scientists might try because they are frustrated that there should be confusion. That is not what most real scientists do however with climate science. I think it is more like a race for funding and those who are not in it for the money should be trusted, but I'm not sure all the climate scientists make lots of money. In many cases those who go to the dark side make more money.
You think climate science is an exclusive club with mean rules to outsiders... join the club! That's how many branches of science run. So if you really want to convert them you will have to pick them off one by one with smart science to contradict their science... I don't think from what I've read of yours that this has been done... I think you are being a little fooled by misleading rhetoric on your own side... remember that there is always room for a couple of professors at a University to say "I want to be rich... I'll just go against the mainstream because I can convert all the dummies." It's sad but true.
We know all too well how much money is being thrown at those who deny climate science... we don't need to name names... please don't call this one-sided. Hillary Clinton said that nobody should say they know climate science is wrong.
Do I have to watch the second video?... I believe in an infinitely large infinitely old Universe, whether or not there were intermittent big bangs occasionally or constantly.
I watched the first video. But again, I don't think astroturfing and climate science are a perfect fit. She may be trying to astro-turf the main stream from a minority post. I have been prescribed drugs that I knew from reading the ads had problems like loss of vision or other terrible things and I chose smart medicine instead - it must be smart because I've taken them for ten years and I am completely free of disease with good bio-stats. Also, I know they help me with my mental problems. As for whether climate scientists astro-turf, no I think they debate maturely. I'm sorry if I astro-turfed you about it myself though. I was a poor example but I did it only because I wanted to help you and thought I could snap you out of it quickly... something some scientists might try because they are frustrated that there should be confusion. That is not what most real scientists do however with climate science. I think it is more like a race for funding and those who are not in it for the money should be trusted, but I'm not sure all the climate scientists make lots of money. In many cases those who go to the dark side make more money.
You think climate science is an exclusive club with mean rules to outsiders... join the club! That's how many branches of science run. So if you really want to convert them you will have to pick them off one by one with smart science to contradict their science... I don't think from what I've read of yours that this has been done... I think you are being a little fooled by misleading rhetoric on your own side... remember that there is always room for a couple of professors at a University to say "I want to be rich... I'll just go against the mainstream because I can convert all the dummies." It's sad but true.
We know all too well how much money is being thrown at those who deny climate science... we don't need to name names... please don't call this one-sided. Hillary Clinton said that nobody should say they know climate science is wrong.
Do I have to watch the second video?... I believe in an infinitely large infinitely old Universe, whether or not there were intermittent big bangs occasionally or constantly.