You will get use to his answers that don't represent what you say. You are doing great!Neither one. And there you go again. Sorry, doesn't work on me.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You will get use to his answers that don't represent what you say. You are doing great!Neither one. And there you go again. Sorry, doesn't work on me.
It is rather amazing at times. If someone was here telling others how they could hire prostitutes, how much it costs, what they would do sexually. And answer several other questions they would accuse that person of promoting prostitution. And I would agree with them. But when the Bible does the same in regards to slavery that is different for some weird reason.It's kinda sad watching the level of mental gymnastics and cognitive dissonance that has gone into defining the Torah/bible.
Oh noes, why the personal attack against @Kathryn ?You will get use to his answers that don't represent what you say. You are doing great!
What? Sorry, been sort of busy.
It says a lot, when for so many centuries Christians debated and toiled over the slavery subject, but it when societies and states begin to secularize is when it began ending. Is it a coincidence that slavery began falling out of favor en masse, began to be prohibited and not too very long after it was announced that God is dead and we killed him? I don't think it is because slavery is something Christians (wildly ironic to boundless ends) have tended to support, if for no other reason it's permitted in the Bible. Afterall, especially in a time before penicillin and psychiatry and when we're not dumb by any means but know little about the world, do we want to risk taking a chance by prohibiting what God's Holy Word permits? Christian influence wanes, so why are going to keep it around when even many Christians have long argued against it?It is rather amazing at times. If someone was here telling others how they could hire prostitutes, how much it costs, what they would do sexually. And answer several other questions they would accuse that person of promoting prostitution. And I would agree with them. But when the Bible does the same in regards to slavery that is different for some weird reason.
And to think people actually read this stuff and then with a strait face go on suggest that it's the best moral compass for the modern world.It is rather amazing at times. If someone was here telling others how they could hire prostitutes, how much it costs, what they would do sexually. And answer several other questions they would accuse that person of promoting prostitution. And I would agree with them. But when the Bible does the same in regards to slavery that is different for some weird reason.
100% agree. The nuance is there for people who want to talk about history, but not from bad faith positions that just want to play apologetics for slavery.
And discuss. Thanks!
First off you would have to show the bible has been correctly interpreted.
Is it moral to own another human being as property?
Or a sailor either, or anyone who worked on a ship.It does seem to me like they are translating it into something kind of broad, that could be broken up into many different tiers of workers. But I think something did certainly exist as we think of it, that being someone with few rights, who was forced to work. I would have to dig back where I think read it in one of seneca's letters, about the slave rebellion in rome, where, the practice was to execute a whole group if one person lied. By the same token, I don't think it was a picnic being a solider either, if you read back to see penalties for minor mishaps
Which interpretation? LOL Which language?
If there is only one true bible, then that one.
You are being
Come now, you know you're being obtuse. The bible is a collection of many books written over thousands of years in various languages.
Instead of one of The 10 Commandments being something like "You should have no other gods than me"
Why not scrap that and insert, "You should not own another human being and all humans should be treated equal."
I don't necessarily care what the motivation is for enslaving others. I don't think it's morally better to enslave someone because they're from another country or village than because they're from another race ("black" and "white" didnt even exist as racial categories in ancient Israel, anyway). So yes, the particular circumstances and rationalizations were different. But they're all morally indefensible, as far as I'm concerned.
There are different rules of slavery in the OT for different people. These verses are not the totality of the bible describing slavery and God’s attitude toward the practice. In summary of the verses below:And discuss. Thanks!
So why would God allow for beating the slave under certain conditions? Is that just because it is practical? Could God have not come up with a different way to address the issue that you seem requires slavery to exist?All cultures practiced slavery in antiquity, and it wasn't seen as a matter of morality, it was seen as a matter of practicality.
Especially true for nomadic and early agrarian cultures since they didn't have prisons.
The only other two options would have been to kill captured enemies, which is arguably less moral, or let them go, which generally speaking would have been a really bad idea.
What do you think motivated the Southern Baptists of the Confederate South using the Bible to justify their slavery, and even their decision to separate from the USA and go to war to resolve the politics of that policy? IOW, why so much moral disagreement among Christians when they have the Bible as a moral guide?Personally I wouldn't do it because it goes against the second great commandment by Jesus for me, which is "love your neighbor as yourself." It would be morally wrong for me to do it.
Personally I wouldn't do it because it goes against the second great commandment by Jesus for me, which is "love your neighbor as yourself." It would be morally wrong for me to do it.