Your god...?And, can you think of some thing that had no cause to exist? Enlighten me!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Your god...?And, can you think of some thing that had no cause to exist? Enlighten me!
Bingo! God created this way...which means god is worth no more than an algebra equation..God tells me no more about the universe, physics, chemistry, life, the human experience...then an algebra equation I learned from 5th grade. If god made it like it is, then god is nothing more than the body of physical laws and equation we use every day to predict all manner of things.
If god created it this way..then god is predictable....
Your god...?
And the reason why this Primal Cause aka the Creator Who caused the Universe exists?I don't have a god. The Primal Cause aka the Creator Who caused the Universe to exist is not a god but the reason why the Universe exists.
If god created it this way, then he created it to behave in a perfectly predictable manner. Humans, with science, are proving that the universe works in a perfectly predictable manner (even if we are not to the point of predicting everything ourselves).How silly. One who can not only create matter, energy and life, is not better than an 5th grade algebra equation? Enlighten us all with your great knowledge and tell us an equation that can create life.
What one creates is grater than what He creates.
Your comments sound like something a dis-functional 4th grader would say.
And the reason why this Primal Cause aka the Creator Who caused the Universe exists?
If god created it this way, then he created it to behave in a perfectly predictable manner. Humans, with science, are proving that the universe works in a perfectly predictable manner (even if we are not to the point of predicting everything ourselves).
So if gawd created a universe that operates in a manner which humans may predict using mindless FORMULAS, gawd can be no greater than a mindless mechanism. The universe operates by perfectly predictable physical principles. It is the human mind, capable of conceiving these principles, that is the greater of the two.
For my view, all I have to do is observe, comprehend, and understand the operation of what comes to me through my senses. For your view, you had to make baseless assumptions that gawd exists, that god can create matter, energy, and life. And you call my view silly? You can carry a light, but you can't enlighten a mind that hides from the light!
And why would this Primal Cause exist?You are repeating my questions! I said, the Primal Cause is the reason why the Universe exists.
If god created it this way, then he created it to behave in a perfectly predictable manner.
Humans, with science, are proving that the universe works in a perfectly predictable manner (even if we are not to the point of predicting everything ourselves).
So if gawd created a universe that operates in a manner which humans may predict using mindless FORMULAS, gawd can be no greater than a mindless mechanism. The universe operates by perfectly predictable physical principles. It is the human mind, capable of conceiving these principles, that is the greater of the two.
For my view, all I have to do is observe, comprehend, and understand the operation of what comes to me through my senses.
For your view, you had to make baseless assumptions that gawd exists, that god can create matter, energy, and life. And you call my view silly?
You can carry a light, but you can't enlighten a mind that hides from the light!
I'll take that challenge!!! The moment you demonstrate the need for a cause, i.e.!I'll take a break from the frontline and give you the chance to tell what or who caused the Universe to exist. If you dare to take the challenge, I am all ears.
Yawn!Right. It is called "intelligent Design." If God didn't creatg it, how did it come into being?
Because you say so? Or just 'because?'That is because God created a perfect world.
Der, der, der...cause you say so, I guess? Oh wait, because someone told you so..I guess?Not true. Teh one who created teh process is the greatest. God knew all he answers before man even knew some of the questions.
So now you're waiting on me to tell you so? Sorry, you have received your answers from on high and the questions no longer seem to matter to you!You ar so wonderful and intelligent. I would like to know how matter, energy and life came into existence. With your wonderful mind, that should be an easy question for you to answer. I can hardly wait.
Apology accepted!How silly of me.
Really? You are asking for evidence? Given your mindset of 'that's how I heard it so it must be true' I'm shocked you even recognize the existence of rational thought and science.I can hardly for you with your great intellect to tell me how it all happenend. Be sure to include the science behind y9ur answer.
Such wisdom. Why don't you write a book called, "I know everything about everything--just ask.
I'll take that challenge!!! The moment you demonstrate the need for a cause, i.e.!
And why would this Primal Cause exist?
Yawn!
Because you say so? Or just 'because?'Der, der, der...cause you say so, I guess?
Oh wait, because someone told you so..I guess?So now you're waiting on me to tell you so? Sorry, you have received your answers from on high and the questions no longer seem to matter to you!Apology accepted!Really? You are asking for evidence? Given your mindset of 'that's how I heard it so it must be true' I'm shocked you even recognize the existence of rational thought and science.
No. A way of telling how boring your point is!Brilliant way to avoid answering the question.
Really? When did they tell you?I am glad you recognize it as a guess but it is not becaue i sasy so, it is because the Intelligent Designers says so.
Again, it's not a worthy challenge to debate a talking wall. Something makes 'sense' to you, therefore you 'conclude' and no logic or argument penetrates your confirmation bias.I guess beating around the bush and blowing smoke is your way of avoiding answering the question because you realize you can't.. How sad.
I think you are confused on the term 'logical.' Your so called logical fact does not, at least as far as you've been able to demonstrate, have any relation to a logical presentation.The need for the Cause is based on the logical fact that we would not be here today verbal juggling with each other if the Primal Cause had not caused the Universe to exist. Now, make your purpose significant to challenge my view by answering my question. Again: If the Universe could not logically have caused itself to exist, it is only obvious that something or Someone that preceded it caused it to exist. Now, make good on your word to challenge mine. Thank you!
So you've just proved, in your rhetoric, that my and your parents are the primal cause. If it weren't for them, we would not be here today verbal juggling with each other.The need for the Cause is based on the logical fact that we would not be here today verbal juggling with each other if the Primal Cause had not caused the Universe to exist.
Again, make your question pertinent by first defending your assumptions that because something 'is only obvious; to you, that it is logical to conclude such. Last time I checked...well...you know what *** umptions do to your credibility.Now, make your purpose significant to challenge my view by answering my question. Again: If the Universe could not logically have caused itself to exist, it is only obvious that something or Someone that preceded it caused it to exist. Now, make good on your word to challenge mine. Thank you!
Wo wo, well well...everything must have a cause...except god...which proves there is a god!!!! I mean, if everything must have a cause, then there must be a primal cause. And if that primal cause is omnipotent, which it must be, then obviously there is no need to require the cause to have a cause. That would just be silly.Your god...?
I think you are confused on the term 'logical.' Your so called logical fact does not, at least as far as you've been able to demonstrate, have any relation to a logical presentation.
You assume there must be a cause. And assuming there must be a cause, you further assume the cause must be divine in nature.
Now, once you make these assumptions, then yes they form the basis for concluding there must be a cause.....see....If you assume there must be a cause, then there must be a cause.
Furthermore, even if there is some cause, there is no need to assume it is anything other than a purely physical mechanism.