• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Big Bang Theory is dead.

Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
SavedByTheLord said:
Nonsense from you which is unsupported.
You have circular reasoning and that is why you have no real answer.
Click to expand...
That is not a refutation. You are now running away from a reasonable request and in dong so admitting that you are wrong.

When people offer to discuss the ideas that you do not understand and your claims that you cannot support and you run away that is only admitting that you were wrong.
 
TagliatelliMonster

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
SavedByTheLord said:
Then what exactly is wrong with his methodology?
First, the decay chain is well known and the decay rates are well known. He eliminated all possibilities because there are only a few that were possible. That lead to the primordial conclusion.
Second, he offered a simple test to refute his work. And with today's technology that should be easy. No one has done it.
Third, the flood poof work also refutes evolution and billions of years.
Fourth, he documented the censorship he endured.
Have you even read his book?

No.
So you are using circular reasoning.

All reasoning for evolution and billions of years is circular reasoning and not science.

This is it in a nutshell.

We know evolution and billions of years are true (conclusion is the assumption) and since we know evolution and billions of years are true (conclusion is the assumption) and such and such exists, it must have evolved because we know evolution and billions of years are true (restating the assumption as the conclusion).

Furthermore, any evidence that contradicts evolution and billions of years must be false because we know evolution and billions of years are true.
Click to expand...

CF201: Polonium Haloes

www.talkorigins.org www.talkorigins.org
 
The Hammer

The Hammer

Skald
Premium Member
SavedByTheLord said:
There is an infinite number of numbers between 1 and 2, but the span is just 1.
2-1=1
So where did the universe come from?
Click to expand...

2.00000000 (infinitely) -1.00000 (infinitely) = 1.00000000000000 (infinitely) inasmuch as tree - minus fruit = barren.

It's a word and a language.
 
The Hammer

The Hammer

Skald
Premium Member
SavedByTheLord said:
So what is 2-1 according to you?

and what was the first living creature and what features did it have?
What was its code?
Click to expand...

2-1 is a language :). Like Hebrew, or Elvish. That's what it is according to me

As for the rest. I'm not answering your questions because you've refused mine through most of your threads.

So ask someone else.
 
SavedByTheLord

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
The Hammer said:
2-1 is a language :). Like Hebrew, or Elvish. That's what it is according to me

As for the rest. I'm not answering your questions because you've refused mine through most of your threads.

So ask someone else.
Click to expand...
2-1 is mathematics.
But here is a word problem for you.
If you owed me 2 dollars and I said you can give me 1 dollars less to settle the debt, then according to you, you should give me an infinite number of dollars.

what was the cause of the effect of the universe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top