Evolution avoids this by starting the theory at the first replicators, rather then nothing. Evolution needs its own semi-divine beginning as though replicators "poofed" into existence, allowing the theory to begin. After that it is fine, but their t=0 does not sit quite right since we all know other things needed to happen first, based on the BB theory, starting with simple things like hydrogen and helium and even before that, quantum things. Biology skips too many physical evolution steps, which is an artifact of specialization; one hand does know what the other hand is doing. This explains why evolution still need dice and cards math, and can not just reason it through; uncertainty created by skipping early steps.
The BB theory does a similar thing starting with the primordial atom or the singularity for the BB; poof. Both theories have their own unspoken creator to get each theory jump started. I suppose that sort of suggests some unknown god affect. God was needed to set the ducks in a row with the initial "poofs". Those poofs took a lot of planning to create two good starting points that then allows science and logic to follow, even if it ignores how the before t=0, "poofs" happened. Other things also needed to happen first to reach each starting point for each theory, but are ignored or are unknown.
As an analogy, say you meet a new person, who is friendly, but they do not like to talk about themself. You try to figure them out through your daily contact, but you have no data of them before you first met. In a sense that first day of meeting will become a t=0 "poof." Obviously, what came before that arbitrary t=0, should have an impact of what you see today. However, since you are in the dark, your best theory can only start at their middle age, since this is where your hard data begins. You plot your curve and call the first day of meeting t=0, even though you know the real curve is actually starting much earlier at t=-X. Your theory cannot be exactly right, other than supporting the data connected to your own starting point bias.
A better theory will need to try to coax extra data from that private person, so you can start earlier. But this will shift the entire curve left, starting closer to t=-x on your original curve. The new shifted curve may not overlap the curve of biased expectations, in the same way, since it is now out of phase. This is what is happening. New data appears than does not allow the classic t=0 poof starting date, since other things need to happen first, but are not allowed, since that would shift the curve and make it less dogmatic.
It will throw a monkey wrench in the bureaucracy of science. Science is not just about finding truth in nature but is also about jobs, careers, management hierarchy, prestige, money, resources, etc, and large changes like changing the poof, are not easy to accommodate without secondary consequence to all those political things that are not science.
