Do you believe in the big bang?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The Big Bang
- Thread starter The Sum of Awe
- Start date
ThatRutledgeGuy
Agnostic Theist
I haven't heard anything better yet.
WOW...another one that won't even come close to the truth.
~
From the total lack of substance in a totally void of nothingness was contained a miniscule amount of everything that ever existed in the Cosmos.
I will take back some of that, there couldn't have been a Cosmos before that time, it didn't exist, just like time, and gravity, and space.
A little old priest, named Georges Lemaître, had a silly dream one night about Moses' writings about Adam and Eve and the creation and thought up the idea of the big bang.
Everything from nothing caused by this entity called the creator, or God if you will, fitting it all in the book of the Old Testament, BANG!!
Ah yes....genisis...what a book...and following that...Paul...and on and on...
~
The short of it, it never happened, there wasn't any "void", there wasn't any microscopic infinite "gravity", there wasn't any "singularity",
there wasn't any "container" to encapsulate the plasma, and so on and so on.
~
This is some more of the crap that is spread around in the world to make the theists happy with the fact that they are going to die sometime.
Good luck with that belief, you will be just a memory some time, just like everyone else will, if you live a good life and do well to others.
Other than that, you will turn to dust and vapors like the rest of us, there isn't any cognizance after death.
~
Wow......that was a terrible rant wasn't it....sorry about that....where's my meds !
~
'mud
~
From the total lack of substance in a totally void of nothingness was contained a miniscule amount of everything that ever existed in the Cosmos.
I will take back some of that, there couldn't have been a Cosmos before that time, it didn't exist, just like time, and gravity, and space.
A little old priest, named Georges Lemaître, had a silly dream one night about Moses' writings about Adam and Eve and the creation and thought up the idea of the big bang.
Everything from nothing caused by this entity called the creator, or God if you will, fitting it all in the book of the Old Testament, BANG!!
Ah yes....genisis...what a book...and following that...Paul...and on and on...
~
The short of it, it never happened, there wasn't any "void", there wasn't any microscopic infinite "gravity", there wasn't any "singularity",
there wasn't any "container" to encapsulate the plasma, and so on and so on.
~
This is some more of the crap that is spread around in the world to make the theists happy with the fact that they are going to die sometime.
Good luck with that belief, you will be just a memory some time, just like everyone else will, if you live a good life and do well to others.
Other than that, you will turn to dust and vapors like the rest of us, there isn't any cognizance after death.
~
Wow......that was a terrible rant wasn't it....sorry about that....where's my meds !
~
'mud
Last edited by a moderator:
Desert Snake
Veteran Member
no, or irrelevant/partial big bang/
GoodbyeDave
Well-Known Member
A quick check at Wikipedia shows that Lemaitre
- was a professor of astronomy
- derived Hubble's law
- estimated Hubble's constant
- was a pioneer computer programmer
- was one of the inventors of the Fast Fourier transform algorithm
- was a major contributer to the study of elliptic space
And what are your qualifications, to enable you to evaluate his work?
Runewolf1973
Materialism/Animism
Well something happened, and it wasn't God. The Big Bang is the best explanation we have thus far and it is backed by science.
Runewolf1973
Materialism/Animism
Finding out that they were wrong would be an amazing breakthrough for science.
CynthiaCypher
Well-Known Member
I hate that show. I don't get the appeal.
Other: I don't care.
nash8
Da man, when I walk thru!
Pwned!!!!!
Can you either cite or PM some information against the speed of light being constant and against space-time theory? I'd be interested in seeing both.
What???? Best show ever!!!
And I think the Big bang happened, and would consider it the beginning of the universe as we know it, but I don't necessarily believe it was the "first thing".
About the reverend father Georges, educated in a theistically oriented environment in the 20's and 30's, went to war in the 30's, dabbled in sophormic cosmology, never looked through a really complex telescope, and on and on. His coralaries and hypothesis on the evolution of cosmotic motions are quite unremarkable in veiwing from an isopatic direction, considering that the cosmos, as we now know, it to be totally random.
Looking at his discoveries:
(1) He entertains the assumption of a singular "singularity", I love saying that, that exists in a......
(2) "void", a nothingness without direction, motion, substance, or value.
(3) What contained the "singularity" for all those....I want to say years, but that would mean "time", and there wasn't any time then. What was the container made from, what was the "gravity" that held it together and how "hot" was it ? From what was this "plasma" made ?
(4) He says that the "singularity" suddenly inflated into the universe (void) that we live in, about 13 to 20 billions of years ago.
(5) Where is the supposed "center" of the inflation point, and is it still going on, it's said that the inflation is still occurring.
~
If this "singularity" inflated from a central point, why do galaxies collide ?
Why aren't all the galaxies, energies, matter, and other substances going out from the source of the "center" of inflation ?
What changes the direction of galaxies to escape the center of the inflation ?
Was the "singularity" spherical, or was it focused when it inflated, does anyone really know ?
If the universe is random, as it seems to be, how far out into the "void" does it go, what direction are galaxies coming at us now ?
~
I could continue but no one is really reading this crap anyway.
There wasn't ever a big bang, the Cosmos is totally random, stars are created and galaxies collide, and we all live awhile.
Good deal if you can get it.
~
'mud
Looking at his discoveries:
(1) He entertains the assumption of a singular "singularity", I love saying that, that exists in a......
(2) "void", a nothingness without direction, motion, substance, or value.
(3) What contained the "singularity" for all those....I want to say years, but that would mean "time", and there wasn't any time then. What was the container made from, what was the "gravity" that held it together and how "hot" was it ? From what was this "plasma" made ?
(4) He says that the "singularity" suddenly inflated into the universe (void) that we live in, about 13 to 20 billions of years ago.
(5) Where is the supposed "center" of the inflation point, and is it still going on, it's said that the inflation is still occurring.
~
If this "singularity" inflated from a central point, why do galaxies collide ?
Why aren't all the galaxies, energies, matter, and other substances going out from the source of the "center" of inflation ?
What changes the direction of galaxies to escape the center of the inflation ?
Was the "singularity" spherical, or was it focused when it inflated, does anyone really know ?
If the universe is random, as it seems to be, how far out into the "void" does it go, what direction are galaxies coming at us now ?
~
I could continue but no one is really reading this crap anyway.
There wasn't ever a big bang, the Cosmos is totally random, stars are created and galaxies collide, and we all live awhile.
Good deal if you can get it.
~
'mud
CynthiaCypher
Well-Known Member
I despise Geek Culture.
outhouse
Atheistically
The universe is expanding, fact.
Roll bad the clock and we end up coming from a singularity, of which our universe is full of.
Not knowing a cause, does not mean something did not happen. We don't understand gravity, but the apple factually falls. Do we keep making ancient mens mistakes of attributing what we don't know or understand to mythology? or do we just say, we don't know, and look for an answer.
samosasauce
Active Member
It's the best option we've got; and they forget that The Big Bang wasn't actually a bang, according to scientific theory