• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The biggest "plot hole" in Genesis...

There are many strong arguments pointing towards the book of Genesis as being more of an amalgamation of multiple creation legends, or at least a compilation/amalgamation of more than one variation.

(This is immediately noticeable in the first 2 chapters alone - which contains the first contradiction in the Bible, chronologically speaking. Namely, in chapter 1 mankind is created last - after all the land, plants, animals, etc. Then immediately in chapter 2, Adam is the first living organism created on earth, followed by vegetation, then animals, and then Eve. This is but one example.)

That in itself is not the biggest plot hole in Genesis, though.

In my opinion - what follows, is:
--------------------------------------

We all know the story of Cain & Abel. But for the sake of effect, I will paraphrase the story in abbreviated satire...

Cain is a farmer of the land, while Abel tends to the animals. For some reason, both of them feel compelled to offer sacrifices to Jehova, to win his favor.

(Even though offering sacrifices was not an official requirement or part of the mosaic law as yet... which was to be set in place and effected thousands of years later. Up to that point, the only law that seemed to exist was the ban on eating from the tree of life. Strange.)

So they each prepare a sacrifice, and offer it to Jehova. Abel's sacrifice pleases Jehova, while Cain's offering does not. (I guess Jehova prefers animal sacrifice over a pile of grain. Come to think of it... I'm not much of a vegan myself)

So out of jealousy, Cain strikes down Abel in a field, and so becomes the world's first murderer. Jehova confronts him on this, and Cain is cast out of Eden.

Cain immediately expresses fear about what will happen to him, saying: "I will be a restless wanderer on the earth, and whoever finds me will kill me".

And this, folks, is where things really get interesting.

"But the Lord said to him, “Not so; anyone who kills Cain will suffer vengeance seven times over.” Then the Lord put a mark on Cain so that no one who found him would kill him. So Cain went out from the Lord’s presence and lived in the land of Nod, east of Eden."

Shortly thereafter, we are told that Cain and his wife have their first child, whilst Cain is building the world's first city. A few generations pass, and already one of the great grandkids has figured out the whole metallurgy thing, and has fast-forwarded thousands of years (technologically speaking) by producing bronze tools and weaponry :shrug:.

There's just one little problem with all this.

Cain was one of three people on Earth.
The other two being Adam, and Eve.

And let's just reasonably assume that Eve wasn't the "swinging" type, spending one weekend with Adam, the other with... (need I say more?)

* Who exactly did Cain marry?
* Who was Cain afraid of - to the extend where Jehova had to mark him with a transferable curse?
* And why was he building a city (and with whom)?


Keep in mind that Adam & Eve don't have another child (Seth) until Adam is 120 years old, after which they are said to have had other sons & daughters.

So - according to literal interpretation - Cain would literally have the earth to himself, because at this point he was the only child of the primordial humans, Adam & Eve.

Even if there were, hypothetically, other unmentioned siblings at that time - none of them were cast out from Eden. Only Cain.

And hypothetically assuming that Cain already had a "sister-wife" (incestuous, but still)... that still doesn't rationalize Cain's fears. The only people on Earth, supposedly, were his parents and possibly unnamed siblings. In all cases, immediate family - who wouldn't have been very likely to kill him.

This little "slip" has massive ramifications.

Let's briefly explore them:
------------------------------

Scenario 1: The creation story is geo-specific, and refers to the Genesis of a nation (Hebrew/Hyksos) in a localized area, rather than the entire universe. Thus, Cain's banishment would have essentially been exile to a foreign territory, with different "Gods" (rulership).

Scenario 2: The creation story is metaphorical, where the characters embody ideologies or otherwise abstract associations. Adam & Eve are, perhaps, the representation of the first conscious humanoids who "ate the knowledge of the Gods", and then became conscious of themselves (thus feeling naked).

They were then driven from "Eden" - the lifestyle of simply living in the garden, wandering and eating as needed, and instead were "cursed" and thus transitioned into agricultural society (which would allow for larger populations, and stability).

The friction between Cain & Abel could be symbolic of rivalry between herdsmen and farmers of distant antiquity. Thus, the creation story is a collection of "echoes" from the distant past, using metaphorical figures to preserve our early ancestors as they transitioned from hunting/gathering to building static civilization, and eventually progressing technologically.

Scenario 3: Genesis is to be taken literally, but is alarmingly incomplete - missing entire sections of history that has either been lost, purposely omitted, or somehow misinterpreted in its present form.

-------------------------------------

This is just one of several such plot holes, but it is perhaps the most obvious, and unavoidable "hiccup" in Genesis, particularly for Young-Earthers and literalists.

What are your thoughts on this?

Can Cain's fears be rationalized- without resorting to vague assumptions or blind faith as a supporting arguments?


I'm eager to hear what others might have to say about this...

Cheers,

MoC
 

Shuddhasattva

Well-Known Member
IMO, reflective of struggle between ariculturalists and pastoralists during the spread of agriculture in the middle east.

The idea that Cain, Adam & Eve were the only people (even when seen thru the lens of Genesis) is not accurate. See Gen 5:4
 
IMO, reflective of struggle between ariculturalists and pastoralists during the spread of agriculture in the middle east.

The idea that Cain, Adam & Eve were the only people (even when seen thru the lens of Genesis) is not accurate. See Gen 5:4

Re: Gen 5:3-4

Here's what it says:

"When Adam had lived 130 years, he had a son in his own likeness, in his own image; and he named him Seth. 4 After Seth was born, Adam lived 800 years and had other sons and daughters."


And it's clear from the previous chapter (4), that Seth was born well after Cain & Abel.

So I don't see your point.

Thanks,

MoC
 

Shuddhasattva

Well-Known Member
Re: Gen 5:3-4

Here's what it says:

"When Adam had lived 130 years, he had a son in his own likeness, in his own image; and he named him Seth. 4 After Seth was born, Adam lived 800 years and had other sons and daughters."


And it's clear from the previous chapter (4), that Seth was born well after Cain & Abel.

So I don't see your point.

Thanks,

MoC



Enoch was supposed to be born/founded in the 186th year of Adam's life.
 
Enoch was supposed to be born/founded in the 186th year of Adam's life.

I'm still not seeing how this explains why Cain would be fearful of being cast from Eden, long before that city was built, and long before Adam started having kids again.

None of this changes the (alleged) fact that, at the time of Cain's banishment, he was one of 3 people on Earth, according to Genesis in the OT.

So far, all you've posted has simply confirmed this.

-MoC
 

Shuddhasattva

Well-Known Member
My bad, I didn't realize you were attached to certain views and committed to defending them against information - I'll leave you be.
 
Actually, I'm fishing for clarity, since your posts thus far aren't arguments for anything contrary; instead they're actually supportive.

I don't believe in the creation myth literally, so I don't have any "attachment" - but if it makes you feel superior to state as such, I hope your ego is amply inflated.

Regarding Enoch being built at Adam's 186th year - which verse mentions this?

I'm wondering if you might be referring to Enoch from Seth's line rather than Cain's. There are two, pre-flood Enochs.

-MoC
 
Re: "committed to defending them against information"

Okay... but the "information" you've posted so far is what I've been addressing. The problem is that your information doesn't offer a differing perspective. Your mention of both Gen 5:4 and the Enoch time-frame are non-arguments, because neither of them address the topic (Cain's fear, at the time of banishment).

If you actually consider the fundamental chronology here, that should be pretty clear to you.

But if instead you prefer to use the cop-out of "theory attachment" as a way to exit a debate while attempting to save face...

...might I suggest utilizing your backbone, and actually expanding your position?
 

Shermana

Heretic
Thank you, you have provided much of the arguments for why the people of Genesis 1:26 were not the same as "The Adam" who was given the Garden, but a race of "proto-man".
 

james2ko

Well-Known Member
Before we start, Welcome to the forum. Id like to remind you to read the rules of the forum (located on the top right side of any page) which are strictly enforced by our very capable moderators.

I'm still not seeing how this explains why Cain would be fearful of being cast from Eden, long before that city was built, and long before Adam started having kids again.None of this changes the (alleged) fact that, at the time of Cain's banishment, he was one of 3 people on Earth, according to Genesis in the OT.

What verse in Gen states He was one of three people on earth at the time?
 
What verse in Gen states He was one of three people on earth at the time?

Gen 4:1-2 (birth of Cain and Abel), followed the by the events leading up to 4:25, where Adam says "God has granted me another child in place of Abel, since Cain killed him".

That time period is possibly up to 130 years, according to Gen 5:3

If we are to take Genesis literally, then from the time after Cain kills Abel, until Seth is born, the Bible mentions no other living people apart from Adam, Eve and Cain.

Thanks,

MoC
 

james2ko

Well-Known Member
Gen 4:1-2 (birth of Cain and Abel), followed the by the events leading up to 4:25, where Adam says "God has granted me another child in place of Abel, since Cain killed him".

That time period is possibly up to 130 years, according to Gen 5:3

If we are to take Genesis literally, then from the time after Cain kills Abel, until Seth is born, the Bible mentions no other living people apart from Adam, Eve and Cain.

Thanks,

That is an argument from silence though. The bible does not chronologically record every minute detail of every person's life. Besides another child doesn't necessarily mean Seth was the third to be born. He was simply another child who replaced the one that was killed. Based on the information given in Genesis, one could imply Adam and Eve could have had other children before Seth.
 
That is an argument from silence though. The bible does not chronologically record every minute detail of every person's life. Besides another child doesn't necessarily mean Seth was the third to be born. He was simply another child who replaced the one that was killed. Based on the information given in Genesis, one could imply Adam and Eve could have had other children before Seth.

Fair point.

The real question though, IMO, is why Cain was fearful of being harmed, once OUTSIDE Eden. Obviously scripture is ambiguous on the details, but it doesn't specifically mention that anyone else (siblings) was also cast out, along with Cain.

It implies that he was a lone wanderer.

Were other humans created from "dust" or "ribs" as Adam and Eve - perhaps Cain's mate? It's all possible, but also from an argument of silence.

That's the problem, though. Both perspectives rely on an argument of silence.

I'm curious to see if there scriptural references that expand on this directly.
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
Genesis gives two [2] accounts of creation for two different viewpoints:
The 1st account describes creation, heaven and earth and all in them.- Gen. 1 v 1-2 v 4
The 2nd account concentrates on the creation of the human race and its downfall.- Gen. 2 v 5- 4 v 26

The 1st account is constructed chronologically divided into six constructive 'days' of unknown length.
The 2nd account is written in the order of topic importance.
Genesis chapter 2 adds some details that do not conflict, and all created before 'day' 7.
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
Were other humans created from "dust" or "ribs" as Adam and Eve - perhaps Cain's mate? .

According to Genesis 5 v 4 Adam had sons and daughters. So, Cain married a sister or cousin. Chapter 5 gives us a review of the 'book or history of Adam's generations' showing besides Cain and Abel that there were other children both boys and girls.
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
There are many strong arguments pointing towards the book of Genesis as being more of an amalgamation of multiple creation legends, or at least a compilation/amalgamation of more than one variation.

(This is immediately noticeable in the first 2 chapters alone - which contains the first contradiction in the Bible, chronologically speaking. Namely, in chapter 1 mankind is created last - after all the land, plants, animals, etc. Then immediately in chapter 2, Adam is the first living organism created on earth, followed by vegetation, then animals, and then Eve. This is but one example.)

That in itself is not the biggest plot hole in Genesis, though.
That's not a "pot hole" at all, it's an ontological statement.
 

somethingNiftyhere

Squadoosh 1@ATime
Jared beget Enoch.Enoch was the father of Methuselah.

The Hebrew creation myth described through Genesis was predated by the ancient Sumerian creation epic known as the Enuma Elish.

I think if we don't take Genesis literally we'll have insight into the allegorical nature of the story.
Using the etymology of the characters in the fable we can perhaps begin to see the message that lays underneath what is often taken at face value as an actual account of humanity being created from dirt and a rib.

Adam-(Adamu)
The name Adam means Earthling, or rather Corporeal One. (red earth is another meaning for Adamu)

Enoch-
from Hebrew Hanokh, "dedicated, consecrated,"


Methuselah
"man of the dart," from singular of methim "man" + shelah "dart.

Shelah
may mean Sent Out, Branch or Javelin.

So perhaps tracing the meaning of the names in the "Lineage" of Adam, there may be an underlying story that is hidden in the Genesis creation epic.
After all Jesus said he spoke in Parables and only Parables so that not all would understand and find their way to redemption. Jesus came for the elect.

If Jesus spoke in Parables throughout the New Testament we may presume the beginning of the story of humankind was drafted in Parables or hidden messages as well.

It would take some time to find the underlying message, if there indeed is one, as one researches the etymology or origin of the Patriarchs names, the lineage from Adam unto Joseph.
But it may be worth the effort to see if there is a different way of looking at a story of our beginnings.

Lineage of Adam to Joseph

Adam
|
Seth
|
Enos
|
Cainan
|
Mahalaleel
|
Jared
|
Enoch
|
Methuselah
|
Lamech
|
Noah
|
Shem
|
Arphaxad
|
Salah
|
Eber
|
Peleg
|
Reu
|
Serug
|
Nahor
|
Terah
|
Abraham
|
Isaac
|
Jacob
|
Joseph
 
Top