The circular reasoning of Evolution and billions of years believers.

[Subduction Zone]

Who cares?

You should care. It shows that even your fellow believers are laughing at your incompetence.

So where and when did the first living creature come into being and what protected it?

Another unjustified question that only shows that you are still are your argument from ignorance phase. And all of these questions have been answered with real serious answers. You had no response. You are ignoring the answers to your questions.

Why can't you find any evidence for creationism? You know, evidence, that concept that scientist use. The thing that endlessly supports evolution. The concept that is easy to understand but that you are too afraid to understand.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

You should care. It shows that even your fellow believers are laughing at your incompetence.

Another unjustified question that only shows that you are still are your argument from ignorance phase. And all of these questions have been answered with real serious answers. You had no response. You are ignoring the answers to your questions.

Why can't you find any evidence for creationism? You know, evidence, that concept that scientist use. The thing that endlessly supports evolution. The concept that is easy to understand but that you are too afraid to understand.

So the official evolutionist answer is the same as always, they do not know.

 

[Subduction Zone]

So the official evolutionist answer is the same as always, they do not know.

Well first off there are no "official answers". Second e do know many of the answers to the questions that you always spew. You only ignore the answers when they are given. There is no need to answer questions that have no effect on the topic being discussed.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Well first off there are no "official answers". Second e do know many of the answers to the questions that you always spew. You only ignore the answers when they are given. There is no need to answer questions that have no effect on the topic being discussed.

Questions are very important, after all what good is a theory of origins that has no answer to the origin of anything?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Questions are very important, after all what good is a theory of origins that has no answer to the origin of anything?

They are important. But they need to be reasonable questions. You seem to lack the ability to ask those kind of questions.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

They are important. But they need to be reasonable questions. You seem to lack the ability to ask those kind of questions.

My are not only reasonable but required.

 

[Subduction Zone]

My are not only reasonable but required.

If that was the case you could justify asking them You have not been able to. You have not even tried. That tells us that even you know that you are wrong.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

If that was the case you could justify asking them You have not been able to. You have not even tried. That tells us that even you know that you are wrong.

What was the first living creature, what features did it have, and match that to the protein types it had.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

What was the first living creature, what features did it have, and match that to the protein types it had.

Do you know the answer? If you don't, then how would you know if someone got it right or not?

If you don't know the answer, then asking the question is meaningless. If you declare the answer is the one you want, then question is not being asked for any valid reason.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Do you know the answer? If you don't, then how would you know if someone got it right or not?

If you don't know the answer, then asking the question is meaningless. If you declare the answer is the one you want, then question is not being asked for any valid reason.

But you have no answer.

How could evolution ever have caused this?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

But you have no answer.

I'm interested in whether you have an answer. My question deserves a valid answer and something I shouldn't have to mention someone declaring the religious position you do.

How could evolution ever have caused this?

Do you know the answer or not. If not, then asking the question is meaningless and serves no valid purpose.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

But you have no answer.

How could evolution ever have caused this?

If you don't want an answer, then why ask the question? That would seem duplicitous.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

If you don't want an answer, then why ask the question? That would seem duplicitous.

I would love an answer.

For example, how could evolution have produced this? Be specific please.

Figure 6-80, The structure of a molten globule - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

 

[Dan From Smithville]

I would love an answer.

That doesn't seem right. I know for a fact, you've gotten answers.

For example, how could evolution have produced this? Be specific please.

Figure 6-80, The structure of a molten globule - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

Unfortunately, you have to show me what it means and why it couldn't evolve. Please provide the detail. I would expect that considering what you claim for yourself. Your claims about your position are true aren't they? Do I have reasons to doubt your sincerity?

 

[Mock Turtle]

So the official evolutionist answer is the same as always, they do not know.

We know the creationist answer - I believe because I believe because I believe etc.

I would love an answer.

An answer? How about, forgetting what you have self-indoctrinated yourself into believing and start from scratch - so as to recognise you might have started off with some other religious text and be on a completely different (and perhaps just as erroneous) path than you have already travelled. Life might make more sense then.

 

[Subduction Zone]

What was the first living creature, what features did it have, and match that to the protein types it had.

Blonde,blue eyed, no protein. Stanley was on a very strict diet.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Blonde,blue eyed, no protein. Stanley was on a very strict diet.

The best answer to the first living creature that any evolutionist has come up with.

This refutes evolution and billions of years an proves the God of the Bible created all things.

Figure 6-82, A current view of protein folding - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

 

[ratiocinator]

This refutes evolution and billions of years an proves the God of the Bible created all things.

Figure 6-82, A current view of protein folding - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

No it doesn't.

Nothing in the link refutes evolution. Even if it did, refuting evolution would not refute the age of the universe and Earth. Nothing at all in the link even mentions that subject.

It is absolutely obvious that you are bearing false witness.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

No it doesn't.

Nothing in the link refutes evolution. Even if it did, refuting evolution would not refute the age of the universe and Earth. Nothing at all in the link even mentions that subject.

It is absolutely obvious that you are bearing false witness.

And your explanation is?

 

[ratiocinator]

And your explanation is?

For what?

You posted a link to something that said nothing about evolution, let alone the age of the earth or universe and then made the absurd assertion that it "refutes evolution and billions of years an proves the God of the Bible created all things."

It didn't refute evolution.
Even if it had, that wouldn't refute billions of years.
Even if it had refuted billions of years, that wouldn't prove that the god of the bible created anything.

Try THINKING.