YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
If you'd like to explain, fine. If not, I can only guess at what you mean.Yes, it is speciation as well.
But there is no "Change of kind". Do you realize that?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If you'd like to explain, fine. If not, I can only guess at what you mean.Yes, it is speciation as well.
But there is no "Change of kind". Do you realize that?
I am not sure what you did not understand. What needs an explanation for you?If you'd like to explain, fine. If not, I can only guess at what you mean.
So ... ... ... ... ... because a book written by man thousands of years ago, when the understanding of science and the universe was null at best, states that 6000 years ago a god created the universe and all life in six days, you take this as "irrefutable proof"? ... ... ... ... ... Ah, how nice critical thinking skills are.The circular reasoning of Evolution and billions of years believers.
All reasoning for evolution and billions of years is circular reasoning and not science.
This is it in a nutshell.
We know evolution and billions of years are true (conclusion is the assumption) and since we know evolution and billions of years are true (conclusion is the assumption) and such and such exists, it must have evolved because we know evolution and billions of years are true (restating the assumption as the conclusion).
Furthermore, any evidence that contradicts evolution and billions of years must be false because we know evolution and billions of years are true. (using the assumption as the proof)
Furthermore, they have no real rational answer to the origin of anything. But they know it must have happened because it must have happened by evolution because they know that evolution and billions of years are true. And they are absolutely sure that the answers will one day be found because they know that evolution and billions of years are true.
Some will even use all debate 101 techniques to keep from answering the questions because they have no real rational answers to the origin of anything. These techniques will include posting links to their “irrefutable” sources, denouncing any 6-day recent creation source as not a real source, even calling them liars. They will also say any evidence presented is a forgery, fake of fraud. All their sources are infallible fact checkers, and the only place where peer review takes place.
Some will even try to belittle you as ignorant, not scientific, a grade school education, evil, even accuse you as a hater. I had one say that 2-1 does not equal 1 but infinity. Some will even claim that you never answer their questions, are lying, and are falsely accusing them. Of course, it is always a joy to suffer for the sake of the Lord Jesus Christ.
It was inspired by God who knows how and when He created all things.So ... ... ... ... ... because a book written by man thousands of years ago, when the understanding of science and the universe was null at best, states that 6000 years ago a god created the universe and all life in six days, you take this as "irrefutable proof"? ... ... ... ... ... Ah, how nice critical thinking skills are.
Except that it wasn't.It was inspired by God who knows how and when He created all things.
Simple really to understand.
Oh, yes, quite simple indeed. Hence the critical thinking skills I mentioned.It was inspired by God who knows how and when He created all things.
Simple really to understand.
And for simple minds too - how convenient.It was inspired by God who knows how and when He created all things.
Simple really to understand.
God covers all bases.And for simple minds too - how convenient.
So ... ... ... ... ... because a book written by man thousands of years ago, when the understanding of science and the universe was null at best, states that 6000 years ago a god created the universe and all life in six days, you take this as "irrefutable proof"?
Oh, I was just stating what that user seems to believe about the Bible.Ah, but it doesn't say that. Ussher came up with this calculation based on the "begats." Apparently he had way too much time on his hands.
Doesn't seem to have covered the base of the critical thinkers in my viewGod covers all bases.
Ah, but it doesn't say that. Ussher came up with this calculation based on the "begats." Apparently he had way too much time on his hands.
The Greek LXX has errors.Had Ussher used the Greek Septuagint or the Samaritian Pentateuch, instead of translated Masoretic Texts, then his timeline would have differed greatly.
Is it?Evolution in the Darwinian sense is not merely "change over time." It's much more than that.
So does the King James versions.The Greek LXX has errors.
Why not prove that there is an error in the KJB.So does the King James versions.
So what?
Already been done multiple time by multiple members.Why not prove that there is an error in the KJB.
So you posting one single proof of an error in the KJB should be easy.Already been done multiple time by multiple members.
You simply waved them away with denial.
Here is one you completely failed at addressing:So you posting one single proof of an error in the KJB should be easy.
Post at least 1 then.
Rabbits do eat their own feces.so they do chew their food multiple times before they are done with a particular food.Here is one you completely failed at addressing:
Rabbit chewing its cud.
Wont bother with the smallest seed error.