paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Everybody is welcome to give one's valued thoughts here.
Regards
Regards
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
1. There is no such-a-thing as a "parapsychological researchers/scientist"I think parapsychological researchers/scientists have added tremendously to my understanding of the universe beyond the physical plane and I am grateful for that.
I can give you a string of names but what's the use.1. There is no such-a-thing as a "parapsychological researchers/scientist"
When science does that it is a good thing2. The real question should be: "How often has science contributed to knowledge through the falsification of religious dogma?"
No use. You can run the list from Alvarado to Zingrone and you'll not find a single case of scientifically documented parapsychological phenomena. That's one of the things that makes the Bill Murray line, as Dr. Peter Venkman: "Back off, man. I'm a scientist!" so damn funny.I can give you a string of names but what's the use.
One main, overarching contribution is the better understanding of the universe, identifying claims in scripture that were either wrong or not meant to be taken literally. We aren't the center of the universe, we aren't even the center of our solar system. The earth is spherical. Chances are, life is not limited to this planet. Etc.Everybody is welcome to give one's valued thoughts here.
Regards
You are dead wrong on this one. The responses thus far prove this to be true. Actually, one word (one aspect of the sciences) proves you wrong ... Medicine.The contributions of the sciences to Religion
Sciences have nothing to contribute to religion as it is a different domain where sciences are deaf/dumb/blind.
Regards
The contributions of the sciences to Religion
Sciences have nothing to contribute to religion as it is a different domain where sciences are deaf/dumb/blind.
Regards
You're a very wicked man.1. There is no such-a-thing as a "parapsychological researchers/scientist"
2. The real question should be: "How often has science contributed to knowledge through the falsification of religious dogma?"
It is not part of religion. Agnosticism may use them freely, if they like, no compulsion however, whatsoever. PleaseDripless candles
Flush toilets
Automatic Coffee makers
Audio amplification systems
Printed Sunday bulletins
Parking stripes in parking lots
Good, solid roofing
Heating and air conditioning systems
etc
etc
Just to note; religion consists of more than beliefs, prayers, wailing, and snake handling. It's houses of worship are an integral part of the religious enterprise.
So you don't believe houses of worship are an integral part of the religious enterprise. Okay. Then all I have to say is that it's funny how much time, expense, and effort goes into them. Buildings dedicated to only one thing: the religious recognition and worship of god.It is not part of religion. Agnosticism may use them freely, if they like, no compulsion however, whatsoever. Please
Regards
I can give you a string of names but what's the use.
My point was that you can not overcome a dismissive attitude with information; so what's the use.Perhaps you could give a list of scientific techniques used to investigate parapsychology and the like?