• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Creation of life on Earth explained

nnmartin

Well-Known Member
I have a new theory regarding the existence of life on Earth.

After the Big Bang particles were spread throughout the Universe - normal particles to make up the physical items and anti matter to make up the complementary force / Chemical Life Force.

This Life force (LF) swirls around the universe but collects in certain areas like a foreign liquid in a pond. When the Earth formed this LF was present in the same area.

Random carbon atoms in the 'primeval soup' of the Earth were pulled together due the the immanent presence of this negatively charged anti-matter Life Force (similar to a magnet) - thus the first DNA was produced - atomic attraction.

This could explain how organic life 'knows how' to mutate in the correct way. Due to the pull of the Life Force and the push of natural selection - life forms grow towards their opposing pole in the LF , like a tree growing upwards to the light.

any questions for further clarification or views please ask.
 

nnmartin

Well-Known Member
I think there must be some kind of guiding light for life forms to mutate towards - how else can evolution really be explained - the complex nature of organisms and their relations to one another cannot happen just by random mutation/natural selection.
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
I think there must be some kind of guiding light for life forms to mutate towards - how else can evolution really be explained - the complex nature of organisms and their relations to one another cannot happen just by random mutation/natural selection.
And it isn't. There's much more to it. You can begin learning more by clicking HERE
 

nnmartin

Well-Known Member
That's just a link to a fairly basic biology lesson.

It certainly goes nowhere near to explaining the inter-relational complexity issue.

for example, how does a plant manage by 'mutation' just to chance upon producing a yellow spot on a certain leaf that looks like its main predator thus warding off a potential plant eating insect? How does it 'know' that the predator is yellow for instance. Mutation in this respect just does not explain it - why does the plant not produce a blue spot by mistake?

the theory of attracting lifeforce can explain this more clearly as follows:

The yellow predator has a unique chemical imprint which is left on the plant - over time the RNA in the plant is able to 'learn' that this yellow insect causes destruction and through a process yet unknown to science this imprint is gradually incorporated into the plant's RNA and thus allows for a specific mutation - namely the yellow spot. The attracting Life Force can detect the changes in the plant's RNA mechanism and thus steer the mutation in the right direction.

The Life Force is the missing link in the theory of evolution - it is the cause of every change in Life - the ultimate guider. It is the other half.
 

fallingblood

Agnostic Theist
That's just a link to a fairly basic biology lesson.

It certainly goes nowhere near to explaining the inter-relational complexity issue.

for example, how does a plant manage by 'mutation' just to chance upon producing a yellow spot on a certain leaf that looks like its main predator thus warding off a potential plant eating insect? How does it 'know' that the predator is yellow for instance. Mutation in this respect just does not explain it - why does the plant not produce a blue spot by mistake?

the theory of attracting lifeforce can explain this more clearly as follows:

The yellow predator has a unique chemical imprint which is left on the plant - over time the RNA in the plant is able to 'learn' that this yellow insect causes destruction and through a process yet unknown to science this imprint is gradually incorporated into the plant's RNA and thus allows for a specific mutation - namely the yellow spot. The attracting Life Force can detect the changes in the plant's RNA mechanism and thus steer the mutation in the right direction.

The Life Force is the missing link in the theory of evolution - it is the cause of every change in Life - the ultimate guider. It is the other half.
What you are stating is not a theory. It is possibly a hypothesis, but not a very good one as it is not based on evidence, but on faith.

I mean it is basically dismissed by the fact that you don't have evidence for it, just wishful thinking.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
The Life Force is the missing link in the theory of evolution - it is the cause of every change in Life - the ultimate guider. It is the other half.
Well, when you have peer reviewed articles backing up this vague notion of "life force", do get back to us.
 

outhouse

Atheistically
Imagination and want is one thing



having the education and evidence to go with your peer reviewed material to back your idea, is priceless
 

rusra02

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I have a new theory regarding the existence of life on Earth.

After the Big Bang particles were spread throughout the Universe - normal particles to make up the physical items and anti matter to make up the complementary force / Chemical Life Force.

This Life force (LF) swirls around the universe but collects in certain areas like a foreign liquid in a pond. When the Earth formed this LF was present in the same area.

Random carbon atoms in the 'primeval soup' of the Earth were pulled together due the the immanent presence of this negatively charged anti-matter Life Force (similar to a magnet) - thus the first DNA was produced - atomic attraction.

This could explain how organic life 'knows how' to mutate in the correct way. Due to the pull of the Life Force and the push of natural selection - life forms grow towards their opposing pole in the LF , like a tree growing upwards to the light.

any questions for further clarification or views please ask.

God did it...as the Bible says He did. (Psalms 36:9)
 

Cassiopia

Sugar and Spice
That's just a link to a fairly basic biology lesson.



for example, how does a plant manage by 'mutation' just to chance upon producing a yellow spot on a certain leaf that looks like its main predator thus warding off a potential plant eating insect? How does it 'know' that the predator is yellow for instance. Mutation in this respect just does not explain it - why does the plant not produce a blue spot by mistake?

the theory of attracting lifeforce can explain this more clearly as follows:

The yellow predator has a unique chemical imprint which is left on the plant - over time the RNA in the plant is able to 'learn' that this yellow insect causes destruction and through a process yet unknown to science this imprint is gradually incorporated into the plant's RNA and thus allows for a specific mutation - namely the yellow spot. The attracting Life Force can detect the changes in the plant's RNA mechanism and thus steer the mutation in the right direction.

The Life Force is the missing link in the theory of evolution - it is the cause of every change in Life - the ultimate guider. It is the other half.
Or....
The same plant produces many mutations over time (red spots, blue spots, pink fuzzy lines...) most of these random mutations have no beneficial affect and do not survive long in evolutionary terms. However the random appearance of the yellow spot does indeed turn out to mimic a predator and thus has a beneficial effect. More plants with the yellow spot survive than those that don't have the yellow spot. Thus over a long period of time the yellow spotted variety becomes the norm.
That is really how evolution really works and to understand it you have to get your head round probability statistics over huge eons of time.

Don't get me wrong. I am prepared to believe there may be some more guided elements to evolution than present theories postulate. But so far there is no proof and seemingly no need for them.
 

nnmartin

Well-Known Member
The chances of a random yellow spot of the right size and in the right location are so low that by the time this happened the plant species would probably be extinct anyway. Why does the plant not just mutate into producing some kind of insecticide? - that would be far more efficient.

By the way, I did study biology at high school and never agreed with the teachers there either - they said it was either Darwin or God.

I am now going to describe the '1000 White Babies Hypothesis' in the Creation v. Evolution section to further my point.

Hope to see you all there.
 
Top