• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Debate of God.

godnotgod

Thou art That
Nay...I said what I meant.
Go back and read it again.

I know what you said, but I am saying that the greater negative impact of learning and knowledge is on everyone else.

I make the distinction between intellectual knowledge and learning, and knowing, just as Jesus did when he said:


"Ye search the scriptures, because ye think that in them ye have eternal life; and these are they which bear witness of me"

It is because man places more importance on knowledge and learning, rather than on knowing about his own nature, that chaos results.

But you circumvented the original question: if, as you say, man and God had a relationship for centuries in which time man developed an intimate understanding of God, why then did man turn against God and decide to sin? Why would God wait for centuries to test man? After such a long relationship, God knew man thoroughly, so what need for testing? It sounds too ridiculous.
 
Last edited:

Thief

Rogue Theologian
I know what you said, but I am saying that the greater negative impact of learning and knowledge is on everyone else.

I make the distinction between intellectual knowledge and learning, and knowing, just as Jesus did when he said:

"Ye search the scriptures, because ye think that in them ye have eternal life; and these are they which bear witness of me"

It is because man places more importance on knowledge and learning, rather than on knowing about his own nature, that chaos results.

But you circumvented the original question: if, as you say, man and God had a relationship for centuries in which time man developed an intimate understanding of God, why then did man turn against God and decide to sin? Why would God wait for centuries to test man? After such a long relationship, God knew man thoroughly, so what need for testing? It sounds too ridiculous.

Sit quietly and read Genesis over and over.
Treat it like a mantra.

Your postings seem to run that way.
 

godnotgod

Thou art That
Sit quietly and read Genesis over and over.
Treat it like a mantra.

Your postings seem to run that way.

As usual, you cannot answer questions put to you. At this point, I must say that you have little understanding of the spiritual life you claim to pursue. Time and again, you have shown no understanding of various topics, circumventing answers to questions put to you. All you seem to be capable of doing is to regurgitate memorized beliefs with which you have been indoctrinated.

I am through with you. To go on is pointless. It's like talking to a wall.

Goodbye.
 

godnotgod

Thou art That


What exactly is your source for this assumption?

To my knowledge there is no such implication.

Peace, :)

Bruce

Please refer to post #3790, in which Thief first made the assertion to my response:


Originally Posted by godnotgod
If tabula rasa were the case, how did Man understand God's command not to eat of the Forbidden Fruit? Man did not yet have a language, nor a reference to know right from wrong. In short, Man was a clueless dumbkopf!!

Originally Posted by Thief
Nay....Adam walked with God hundreds of years....so says Genesis.
Plenty of time to learn communication.

I have not researched any such passages in Genesis, but as I recall, Adam lived for a long time, but I thought that was after the Fall. My point was that, if Adam lived for hundreds of years, as Thief asserted, and spent all that time communing with and learning from God, then why did he then choose to sin, going against hundreds of years of instruction from God?
 
Last edited:

atanu

Member
Premium Member
Sit quietly and read Genesis over and over.
Treat it like a mantra.

Your postings seem to run that way.

Knowledge is at many levels. Genesis alone does not prove your point.

Jesus' teaching "Ask and it will be granted", sums up the issue.

You want to uphold the identity, so that will be granted. One who wants non-dual existence will be granted that.

I feel that you do not ponder over the scripture.
 
Last edited:

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Knowledge is at many levels. Genesis alone does not prove your point.

Jesus' teaching "Ask and it will be granted", sums up the issue.

You want to uphold the identity, so that will be granted. One who wants non-dual existence will be granted that.

I feel that you do not ponder over the scripture.

Oh I ponder alright....as far back as I can remember....literally!

Someone had told me that God is creator.
As I leaned on my windowsill late at night....a little boy out of bed.

I looked to the stars and all the many things outside.
And I said to myself...
'...if God created all of this....He is truly wonderful!....'

A chill ran over me in spite of the warm summer night.

I have been awake every night since then....pondering.....
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Where precisely does it say this?

Please provide a citation.

Thank you.

Bruce

Genesis 5 verse 5....
And all the days that Adam lived were 930yrs, and he died.

You might notice there seems a great deal of sketchy report in Genesis.
Hence all these debates we have now....
 

atanu

Member
Premium Member
Oh I ponder alright....as far back as I can remember....literally!
Someone had told me that God is creator.
As I leaned on my windowsill late at night....a little boy out of bed.
I looked to the stars and all the many things outside.
And I said to myself...
'...if God created all of this....He is truly wonderful!....'
A chill ran over me in spite of the warm summer night.
I have been awake every night since then....pondering.....

Romanticism is good. But that does not provide an answer to my point, namely, Jesus' teaching "Ask and it will be granted".
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Upanishads teach "Any difference seen here leads from death to death".

I believe this life is needful...once.

You become who you are by the sayings you make and the deeds you perform.

Then on to the next life.

If your next life fails.....'you' fail...altogether.

As if you were never born.
 

atanu

Member
Premium Member
I believe this life is needful...once.
You become who you are by the sayings you make and the deeds you perform.
Then on to the next life.
If your next life fails.....'you' fail...altogether.
As if you were never born.

Mere wild guesses. Mere opinions.
 
Just can't give up the word play....can you?

If you look directly into the universe.......really?

I don't think God is playing around.
The creation is a serious statement of existence.

This life and the many unique spirits being formed is a serious event.

No kidding around.

I am not my own handiwork.
Neither are you.
Absolutely. I mean, why is this so unusual? I can empathise, that if I marvel at a steam roller, standing in front, I will be steamrollered. The point is, why do people stand in front of them, to intentionally die, when they feel that they must? There is no answer. Why are we looking at life, in this marvellous marvelling manner? The person who stands intentionally in front, doesn't know, you are going through also, the same experience. I feel really obliged, if a person looks at me. I and people like me, are giving the impression, that life is a steam roller, and you are not appreciating it, because I have material reasons, and you don't.
 
Top