Thief
Rogue Theologian
Say then. "No, I do not exist". "Nay" means "Yaaa".
Can't say 'I don't exist'....simply can't.
I have to exist.... to say anything.
Therefore...'I AM!'
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Say then. "No, I do not exist". "Nay" means "Yaaa".
Can't say 'I don't exist'....simply can't.
I have to exist.... to say anything.
Therefore...'I AM!'
Exactly. But in what form? In an embodied form only? Who is the owner of "I Am"?
Some people claim we beong to God.
God's children...
God's servants...
God's creation...
This form is of course, temporary.
'Do not confrom to this world, be transformed by it.'
So I've heard.
So. We do not know.
Not the same thing.
Having heard......the plea of ignorance is stolen away.
So having heard....yes you know.
You might not agree....but you know.
Who is the owner of "I Am"?
This was the question.
Exactly. But in what form? In an embodied form only? Who is the owner of "I Am"?
and the answer is in post #3843.
Some people claim we belong to God.
God's children...
God's servants...
God's creation...
This form is of course, temporary.
'Do not confrom to this world, be transformed by it.'
So I've heard.
OK.
Why stick to the Temporary? Why wilfully ignore "He was before All. In Him all subsist."
(I think we are going in circles. There are different states of seekers and one seeker's requirement will not match another. Accordingly there are variety of dishes available).
.THIS form is temporary.
God is not like us.
It is said of Him....was ....is .....and shall always be.
.We have beginnings..
It was already commented upon as below. You wish to continue with the temporary only.
Reality has no beginning. It was laready pointed out that you are wilfully ignoring a simple teaching "He was before All. In Him all subsist.
I repeat: .....I think we are going in circles. There are different states of seekers and one seeker's requirement will not match another. Accordingly there are variety of dishes available. I cannot argue with your choice to stick with illusion.:sorry1:
I believe in linear existence.
I'm not the one going about in circles.
Ecclesiastes
---What has been will be again,
what has been done will be done again;
there is nothing new under the sun.
Is there anything of which one can say,
“Look! This is something new”?
It was here already, long ago;
it was here before our time.
I believe in linear existence.
Debate, with the intention of improving understanding cannot take place when one sticks to an unfounded belief. Your belief is neither supported by reason nor by scripture.
I do not wish to to waste time with you anymore. No offence meant. Best.
If you ever question your own beliefs, then we may resume, perhaps?