The Democrats Created The KKK

[Jollybear]

You lack the basic information to give you a less than 10,000 word reply. Since you are not paying me anything, to correct your severe educational lack? I find I'm disinclined to write a college-level course for you, for free...

Alright, well, if you wont answer my question, then ill give you the lesson on economics.

If im a farmer growing corn and i lose a contract with China, then ill seek to sell my corn to another country or group. If they also dont wish to buy my corn, then i will grow something else and sell it. I will first do my research to find what the market demands.

If im smart, ill come out winning, if not, ill lose. In a free market, there is winners and losers.

 

[metis]

If they also dont wish to buy my corn, then i will grow something else and sell it. I will first do my research to find what the market demands.

Easier said than done since a corn-farmer's machinery is not going to be compatible for growing and harvesting turnips.

 

[Jollybear]

Easier said than done since a corn-farmer's machinery is not going to be compatible for growing and harvesting turnips.

He can sell his machinery or trade it.

 

[Prometheus85]

Your saying the republicans are the racist party now. You have not truly proven that. I kinda hear you saying conservatism is the racism, unless im mistaken by that perception. In which case, define conservatism in your eyes to me?



Why do i need to keep giving you a dam reading lesson? Go google search reading comprehention tutorials or something.

If i say democrats created the kkk, im saying more then one democrat created it, but im not saying ALL dems created it.

If it was one democrat, id say "one democrat" or id say "a democrat"

If im saying more then one democrat, id say "democrat'S" with the S at the end. Or i could say "more then one democrat". That works fine too. Theres a veriety of ways to say the same thing.

Hopefully this is the nail in the coffin for you on that now.



Remember that bias rating site i gave you? Well, for the huffpost, it rates them as hard left > Huffington Post (HuffPost) - Media Bias/Fact Check

Now, why am i saying this? Heres why >
No, Donald Trump Isn't a Racist | HuffPost

So if you have a strong left wing news outlet saying theres no proof trump is racist and this is a fact they say, lol, you better listen.

Also here are 10 proofs trump is NOT racist >
10 Facts That Prove President Trump Is Not Racist



Im running out of time, so i cannot respond or read those. If you give me one article, ill read it, give me 2 or more, youl waste your effort. Heads up for next time.

You falsely claimed the Dixiecrats were far left. I gave you proof they were far right conservatives that were absolutely the party of white supremacy. Why are you asking me to define conservatism? And yes the Republican Party is the party of racism. Those southern Dixiecrats converted to the Republican Party in the 1960s thanks to the southern strategy.

Also you seem to be doing a lot of metal gymnastics to explain what you mean by "the democrats" when in a pervious convo you said the democrats created the kkk and they are the racist party". Now you going back on your own words to hold on to you beliefs in the face of overwhelming evidence.

Also you responded to the article I gave you by dismissing it as bias while also sending my an obviously bias website detailing trivial stuff to say trump is not racist because he friends with diamond and silk lmao.

You site the huffpost to say he’s not racist?
Well here’s an article form the huffpost saying otherwise

Here Are 13 Examples Of Donald Trump Being Racist | HuffPost

 

[metis]

He can sell his machinery or trade it.

Still easier said than done since many of these farmers are already financially strapped because of Trump's tariffs.

And then Trump must have finally realized it because he took billions of dollars of taxpayer's money and literally gave it to these farmers, undoubtedly so they wouldn't abandon him in 2020. That's certainly not "free market", so does this upset you at all that he would spend your money that way without even any congressional vote?

 

[Jollybear]

You falsely claimed the Dixiecrats were far left. I gave you proof they were far right conservatives that were absolutely the party of white supremacy. Why are you asking me to define conservatism?

I told you why im asking you to define conservatism! Listen, pay attention and this wont take longer then it has too!

Ill repeat myself. Define conservatism because im gathering that your implying conservatism means the same as racism. Is that what your saying? If yes, PROVE IT. if not, DEFINE IT!

And yes the Republican Party is the party of racism. Those southern Dixiecrats converted to the Republican Party in the 1960s thanks to the southern strategy.

Also, only 3 of those dixiectats converted to the republican party! Dont pretend all did, because its not even close.

Also you seem to be doing a lot of metal gymnastics to explain what you mean by "the democrats" when in a pervious convo you said the democrats created the kkk and they are the racist party". Now you going back on your own words to hold on to you beliefs in the face of overwhelming evidence.

Listen to me very carefully. Im not doing any gymnastics like yourself. Nor am i going back on anything ive said and thats a fact. The intellectual dishonesty vomitting from you is discusting.

Also you responded to the article I gave you by dismissing it as bias while also sending my an obviously bias website detailing trivial stuff to say trump is not racist because he friends with diamond and silk lmao.

Trump dated a half black woman. He had a black spokesperson in his campagn. He was friendly with ben carson and more. This shows hes not racist. If being against a black person proves racism, then what does it prove when your nice to a black person? You see how stupid that race card is? Its BS!

You site the huffpost to say he’s not racist?
Well here’s an article form the huffpost saying otherwise

Here Are 13 Examples Of Donald Trump Being Racist | HuffPost

Shows the huffpost cant make up its mind because it just has to have trump be racist in there left wing bs world.

Still easier said than done since many of these farmers are already financially strapped because of Trump's tariffs.

I heard that theres regulations on what countries you can sell to as well. That dont help. Deregulate would be good.

And then Trump must have finally realized it because he took billions of dollars of taxpayer's money and literally gave it to these farmers, undoubtedly so they wouldn't abandon him in 2020. That's certainly not "free market", so does this upset you at all that he would spend your money that way without even any congressional vote?

Oh yes! Of course. By the way, im a libertarian, not a republican. I agree with some things trump does, but not all things and certainly not this.

 

[Twilight Hue]

You falsely claimed the Dixiecrats were far left. I gave you proof they were far right conservatives that were absolutely the party of white supremacy. Why are you asking me to define conservatism? And yes the Republican Party is the party of racism. Those southern Dixiecrats converted to the Republican Party in the 1960s thanks to the southern strategy.

Also you seem to be doing a lot of metal gymnastics to explain what you mean by "the democrats" when in a pervious convo you said the democrats created the kkk and they are the racist party". Now you going back on your own words to hold on to you beliefs in the face of overwhelming evidence.

Also you responded to the article I gave you by dismissing it as bias while also sending my an obviously bias website detailing trivial stuff to say trump is not racist because he friends with diamond and silk lmao.

You site the huffpost to say he’s not racist?
Well here’s an article form the huffpost saying otherwise

Here Are 13 Examples Of Donald Trump Being Racist | HuffPost

Yet another huge load of pure bull****.

Want to know how many Dixiecrats went over to the Republicans?

Three people.

 

[Prometheus85]

Yet another huge load of pure bull****.

Want to know how many Dixiecrats went over to the Republicans?

Three people.

Now, here's where an adherent to the "The Southern Strategy didn't happen" myth would say "but they didn't actually switch to the Republican party". This is technically true- storm thurmond was the only major national politician to literally switch parties. In short, what happened was as the older generation started leaving politics in the 1960s and 1970s, the younger conservative politicians replacing them began flocking more to the Republicans than the Democrats; but some older politicians held to their party loyalty. This is why some older conservatives like Zell Miller, Jesse Helms, and George Wallace remained in the Democratic party long after the 1960s, even though the party itself generally became more liberal. Individuals didn't switch parties, the demographics did.

 

[Sand Dancer]

You falsely claimed the Dixiecrats were far left. I gave you proof they were far right conservatives that were absolutely the party of white supremacy. Why are you asking me to define conservatism? And yes the Republican Party is the party of racism. Those southern Dixiecrats converted to the Republican Party in the 1960s thanks to the southern strategy.

Also you seem to be doing a lot of metal gymnastics to explain what you mean by "the democrats" when in a pervious convo you said the democrats created the kkk and they are the racist party". Now you going back on your own words to hold on to you beliefs in the face of overwhelming evidence.

Before the late 60s, conservatives, and racists, in the south were Dem. Since then, they became GOP. It's not that hard. Dixiecrat party was extremely short-lived and most immediately went to back to being Dem. That doesn't negate the fact that the parties switched after that.

 

[Shadow Link]

Now, here's where an adherent to the "The Southern Strategy didn't happen" myth would say "but they didn't actually switch to the Republican party". This is technically true- storm thurmond was the only major national politician to literally switch parties. In short, what happened was as the older generation started leaving politics in the 1960s and 1970s, the younger conservative politicians replacing them began flocking more to the Republicans than the Democrats; but some older politicians held to their party loyalty. This is why some older conservatives like Zell Miller, Jesse Helms, and George Wallace remained in the Democratic party long after the 1960s, even though the party itself generally became more liberal. Individuals didn't switch parties, the demographics did.

Before the late 60s, conservatives, and racists, in the south were Dem. Since then, they became GOP. It's not that hard. Dixiecrat party was extremely short-lived and most immediately went to back to being Dem. That doesn't negate the fact that the parties switched after that.

<57:40>

 

[Bob the Unbeliever]

<57:40>

Goofy video needs an eye-roll-- I quit watching when the lying narrator said the "progressives needed a new method of slavery" or some such BS.

Progressives have always been against slavery. That's kinda what "progressive" means.

In contrast to "conservative", which has always meant "keep doing things as we always have been" meaning they were against abolishing the Tradition Of Slave-keeping.

 

[Shadow Link]

Goofy video needs an eye-roll-- I quit watching when the lying narrator said the "progressives needed a new method of slavery" or some such BS.

Progressives have always been against slavery. That's kinda what "progressive" means.

In contrast to "conservative", which has always meant "keep doing things as we always have been" meaning they were against abolishing the Tradition Of Slave-keeping.

Clearly you haven't watched enough of the video then!

 

[Prometheus85]

<57:40>

D'Souza looks to history for validation of his childish worldview -- My Team Good! Your Team Bad! -- cherrypicking evidence that supports it and ignoring everything that contradicts it.

 

[Sand Dancer]

<57:40>

Both of them are deadly.

 

[Bob the Unbeliever]

Clearly you haven't watched enough of the video then!

An hour and a half? What I did watch, (using your cue, 57:40) was clearly propaganda. No thanks. The voice was ... difficult to listen too as well.

Pure garbage video.

 

[Bob the Unbeliever]

Both of them are deadly.

Really? Do you **really** think that if Clinton was a murderer that either tЯump, Slanders OR Monica Lewensky would still be **breathing**?

 

[Shadow Link]

D'Souza looks to history for validation of his...

...Political Science?

 

[Shadow Link]

57:40) was clearly propaganda.

Propaganda don't use facts.

 

[Sand Dancer]

Really? Do you **really** think that if Clinton was a murderer that either tЯump, Slanders OR Monica Lewensky would still be **breathing**?

I didn't mean literally deadly. I just meant neither are very good candidates.

 

[Bob the Unbeliever]

I didn't mean literally deadly. I just meant neither are very good candidates.

None of them are. But. There is a vast difference between a competant moderate (clinton) and an absolute bumbling, idiotic fool-- who can't even make money owning a CASINO! A business who's Business Model, is taking money from drunk gamblers...

Between the two? It's like the difference between boring (clinton) and being inside a sharkanado (tЯumpf)...

Or better? The difference between a Wal Mart manager? (clinton) and being dragged behind a pickup, through a cactus field, while bleeding from gunshot wounds, with spiders inside your pants (trump)...