The Economist endorses Kamala Harris

[SkepticThinker]

I can't hear you from your Echo chamber.

The reverb is horrendous!

You've not demonstrated that I'm in an echo chamber.

On the other hand, you've demonstrated very clearly that you are projecting. I helped you out a bit.

Hey, how's that response going to that post where I showed you that all the things you complain and accuse others of doing, are the exact things Trump does himself, while you fully support and endorse it and him? I await your deeply introspective response.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I can't hear you from your Echo chamber.

The reverb is horrendous!

More projection. Here is a simple test. See if you can make a rational argument supporting Trump. You will have to be able to support it using facts and figures.

 

[Twilight Hue]

More projection. Here is a simple test. See if you can make a rational argument supporting Trump. You will have to be able to support it using facts and figures.

You cant even match your own challenge using Harris. Lol.


Here ya go! It's a long read..

2024 Republican Party Platform | The American Presidency Project

www.presidency.ucsb.edu

Unfair I know because Harris platform for 2024 likely fits on a postcard.

 

[Heyo]

You cant even match your own challenge using Harris. Lol.


Here ya go! It's a long read..

2024 Republican Party Platform | The American Presidency Project

www.presidency.ucsb.edu

Unfair I know because Harris platform for 2024 likely fits on a postcard.

@Subduction Zone wanted an argument supported by facts. Your document contains only "alternative facts".

 

[Subduction Zone]

You cant even match your own challenge using Harris. Lol.


Here ya go! It's a long read..

2024 Republican Party Platform | The American Presidency Project

www.presidency.ucsb.edu

Unfair I know because Harris platform for 2024 likely fits on a postcard.

I could, but you failed amazingly. Try again.

The challenge was to you. Once you meet it then you can challenge me.

 

[Subduction Zone]

@Subduction Zone wanted an argument supported by facts. Your document contains only "alternative facts".

I am getting a bit depressed watching election returns. Never underestimate the stupidity of large numbers of people.