DontFearMe
Member
This is an interesting conversation indeed. Salam is not trying to hide anything here, this is his sincere understanding of his religion. If you do not agree with his understanding, well who are you to condemn him? As far as this verse:
Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means (of annoyance): For Allah is Most High, great (above you all).
I do want to make some points on this verse. From what I understand the specific ill-conduct mentioned in this verse from what I know refers to a woman who is behaving in a loose manner, and from that I got from Tirmidhi. It is recorded in the traditions that Aisha wife of the Prophet said that he never hit any of his wives, ever. Also, this verse is explained further in the traditions. It does not mean BEAT her like she's a man or something. It actually refers to a light tap as the Prophet stated, below the waist.
We have to be wise in interpreting the Quran because in all honesty there are general verses that are explained further in detail that are recorded in the traditions. So, any average joe can look at this verse and say HEY! But the educated Joe looks at this verse and the traditions refering to it and says...
One must also try to remind themselves of the era that this book was revealed in. Not the 20th century feminist movement era in the United States, but in the 7th century middle east. We cannot look at it and actually expect it to coincide with the norms we have today in western society. However many of its principles are ever-lasting.
Interesting to note that women in the 7th century who embraced Islam viewed it as liberation from the existing cultural practices of their day, and today many see it not as liberation, but oppression.
Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means (of annoyance): For Allah is Most High, great (above you all).
I do want to make some points on this verse. From what I understand the specific ill-conduct mentioned in this verse from what I know refers to a woman who is behaving in a loose manner, and from that I got from Tirmidhi. It is recorded in the traditions that Aisha wife of the Prophet said that he never hit any of his wives, ever. Also, this verse is explained further in the traditions. It does not mean BEAT her like she's a man or something. It actually refers to a light tap as the Prophet stated, below the waist.
We have to be wise in interpreting the Quran because in all honesty there are general verses that are explained further in detail that are recorded in the traditions. So, any average joe can look at this verse and say HEY! But the educated Joe looks at this verse and the traditions refering to it and says...
One must also try to remind themselves of the era that this book was revealed in. Not the 20th century feminist movement era in the United States, but in the 7th century middle east. We cannot look at it and actually expect it to coincide with the norms we have today in western society. However many of its principles are ever-lasting.
Interesting to note that women in the 7th century who embraced Islam viewed it as liberation from the existing cultural practices of their day, and today many see it not as liberation, but oppression.