The evolution of the eye

[DavidFirth]

Except one little thing.......evolution is a directly and repeatedly observed and documented fact. We see populations evolve all the time, right before our eyes. Every single new trait, ability, genetic sequence, and species that we've ever seen arise has done so via evolution. Conversely, we've not seen a God create anything....not a single thing, ever.

So merely in terms of what we see with our own eyes, evolution is infinitely superior to creationism.

You have never seen an ape-like creature evolve into a man. You have never seen any one kind of creature evolve into a totally different one.

You have not and cannot observe macro-evolution.

 

[DavidFirth]

Oh, I didn't realize you were a child. Never mind.

On stupid post deserves another. You got it.

 

[Jose Fly]

You have never seen an ape-like creature evolve into a man.

I've never seen the earth orbit the sun either, but I'm extremely confident that it does.

You have not and cannot observe macro-evolution.

Yes I have. You acting like a child, stamping your little feet, and shouting "No you didn't" doesn't change reality.

 

[DavidFirth]

I've never seen the earth orbit the sun either, but I'm extremely confident that it does.


Yes I have. You acting like a child, stamping your little feet, and shouting "No you didn't" doesn't change reality.

Okay, show me a visible, obvious example of macro-evolution.

 

[Jose Fly]

On stupid post deserves another. You got it.

A question......are you trolling, or are you really thinking that you're representing Christianity in a positive light here?

 

[DavidFirth]

A question......are you trolling, or are you really thinking that you're representing Christianity in a positive light here?

I'm just giving you what you're asking for.

Are you trolling, or are you really thinking that you're representing atheism in a positive light here?

 

[Jose Fly]

Okay, show me a visible, obvious example of macro-evolution.

Why? As we've already seen with your interaction with Christine all you'll do is post some childish variation of "Nuh uh", no matter what is posted.

 

[DavidFirth]

Why? As we've already seen with your interaction with Christine all you'll do is post some childish variation of "Nuh uh", no matter what is posted.

So you can't do it?

Christine didn't post proof. She posted opinion based on assumption.

 

[Jose Fly]

I'm just giving you what you're asking for.

I'm asking for Christians to come across as childish idiots at RF? And even if I was, why are you so eager to oblige?

Are you trolling, or are you really thinking that you're representing atheism in a positive light here?

Why do you think I'm an atheist?

 

[DavidFirth]

I'm asking for Christians to come across as childish idiots at RF? And even if I was, why are you so eager to oblige?


Why do you think I'm an atheist?

You're asking for someone to put you in your proper place. Glad to oblige.

 

[Jose Fly]

So you can't do it?

It's already been done, countless times. Christine just posted some good material for you today, but I'd bet my last dollar you didn't look at a bit of it.

I see absolutely no point in presenting science to creationists who act like 5 year olds.

 

[Jose Fly]

You're asking for someone to put you in your proper place. Glad to oblige.

Ok then......and why do you think I'm an atheist?

 

[SkepticThinker]

shunyadragon,
I can't put down in words how ridiculous this whole post is. Nothing in it is worthy of debating.
Allow me to mention just one thing that makes all your post impossible!!!
According to evolution, for something to develope some other part, there must be a need for that part. Now think, before any sight was created, how did the animal know there was such a thing as sight???
Let's go a little further, how did the animal that first started to develope the eye, live until it was developed, and could be used, since it took as least hundreds or thousands of years.
Something that proves evolution to br completely preposterous, is: how did two different animals develope along different lines, one male and one female, and develope male and female sex organs. Of course the organs could not be used until completely matured. Exactly how did the reproduce before there organs were matured, which would have taken a vastly longer period of time than any life span. These are a simpleton's logic, pure dereism.
The Bible says that everything will reproduce after it's own kind, Genesis 1:11,12,21,24,25. That means that an animal without sight would reproduce another, without sight. The term is Prestabilism, and this has proven to be the law since creation!!
Never has a farmer planted wheat and got potatoes. Even though there have been billions of human births, we always get human babies. The real truth is; we are degenerating not evolving into a higher form of life. We have devolved so much The we will bring about our own extenction if God does intervene before long!

You do not understand evolution in the slightest, hence the reason there are so many errors in your post. I recommend reading up on the basics.

Understanding Evolution
Science Outreach

 

[Jose Fly]

You do not understand evolution in the slightest, hence the reason there are so many errors in this post. I recommend reading up on the basics.

Understanding Evolution
Science Outreach

And if he actually reads it and comes back with an informed, thoughtful response........I'll donate to a charity of your choice.

 

[Revoltingest]

This is a good time to remind all to remember that we should be kind to each other.
No matter how obtuse, backward, ignorant, stupid, uneducated & foul smelling one
is, there's no reason to not be nice. So what if we disagree? It's all meh.
So if you're a hugger, glomp on over to some ignant buffoon & engage in some
unwanted touching.

 

[SkepticThinker]

And if he actually reads it and comes back with an informed, thoughtful response........I'll donate to a charity of your choice.

I think my head would explode if that actually happened.

 

[DavidFirth]

It's already been done, countless times. Christine just posted some good material for you today, but I'd bet my last dollar you didn't look at a bit of it.

I see absolutely no point in presenting science to creationists who act like 5 year olds.

None of the links presented proves macro-evolution has happened or ever has happened. It just proves that scientists do an awful lot of assuming.

 

[Jose Fly]

This is a good time to remind all to remember that we should be kind to each other.
No matter how obtuse, backward, ignorant, stupid, uneducated & foul smelling one
is, there's no reason to not be nice. So what if we disagree? It's all meh.
So if you're a hugger, glomp on over to some ignant buffoon & engage in some
unwanted touching.

That's funny, but I feel no obligation to be nice to certain groups of people.

 

[Jose Fly]

None of the links presented proves macro-evolution has happened or ever has happened. It just proves that scientists do an awful lot of assuming.

And thus you illustrate why providing you with scientific info is a waste of time. You didn't even look at it.

 

[DavidFirth]

And if he actually reads it and comes back with an informed, thoughtful response........I'll donate to a charity of your choice.

That link is as silly as the pictures in science books of monkeys slowly becoming men. And there is no proof presented, nor does it claim to prove anything has actually happened. All it does is tell how scientists think it happened.