HonestJoe
Well-Known Member
That approaches my point from the wrong end. You are saying a creator must exist then you are going on the define specific features of that creator. What you call the creator you're claiming exists is the least significant of those features (indeed, using the term "god", with all the baggage that entails, is part of the problem). That creator being singular and eternal are more significant and legitimately open to challenge.What you said is definitely true, however the name 'god' was used on a being far powerful that surpassed than anything right? therefore, it is not wrong to say that god is singular and eternal. The title and the name 'god' was given to the supreme one of all. And so, the 'god' remains a mysteries.
I didn't get "possibility" from your posts. Your statements about the existence and features of god read as pretty definitive to me.Thats why i said i am a normal human. My thinking is limited. What i only described is merely a tiny part of the infinite possibilities.
If you don't have proof or faith then, as I said, taking any kind of account of your god is pointless. Aren't you really just creating yet another religion?Oh, i think you got that last point wrong. I only said and confirms myself that god does exist. But i did not said to put your faith in the god.