Little Nipper
Member
The evidence against Darwin Evolution. A simple straightforward presentation that gives us hope in a world that offers only the possibility of a Cosmic accident that cannot be proven:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I doubt if you understand what evidence is. Right now I am watching the video and I will give you a time stamp of the very first clear lie.The evidence against Darwin Evolution. A simple straightforward presentation that gives us hope in a world that offers only the possibility of a Cosmic accident that cannot be proven:
If as you say, that I don't understand what evidence is, what makes you so sure that you do?I doubt if you understand what evidence is. Right now I am watching the video and I will give you a time stamp of the very first clear lie.
Is there any reason to watch yet more of theThe mathematical challenge to Darwin's Theory of Evolution:
Is this a VLOG?
And here I was thinking this was a discussion board.
As an aside, if you click play on all the videos at once and close your eyes, you would swear you were watching "The View."
I see this as proof positive of an intelligent CREATOR who would invent the wheel but once and then apply it to every form of cart/buggy/wagon that exists. That would make total sense and is not a form of deception except to someone who arrogantly denies GOD and wears silly neckties.
Heaven forbid. They are bunch of silly old biddies with no talent of their own. And Whoopie Goldberg never did leave the country as she threatened when Trump was elected (whether you hate him or not).Is this a VLOG?
And here I was thinking this was a discussion board.
As an aside, if you click play on all the videos at once and close your eyes, you would swear you were watching "The View."
Because I have at least studied the concept a bit. Your ignorance is demonstrated by the science denier sources that you use. For example Douglas Axe is affiliated with the Discovery Institute. The DI was shown to be a lying organization in the Dover Trial.If as you say, that I don't understand what evidence is, what makes you so sure that you do?
So, if someone doesn't belong to your club, he must be lying. I'd hate to have you as my lawyer. So you believe in Richard Dawkins' "Selfish Gene?"Because I have at least studied the concept a bit. Your ignorance is demonstrated by the science denier sources that you use. For example Douglas Axe is affiliated with the Discovery Institute. The DI was shown to be a lying organization in the Dover Trial.
Because I have at least studied the concept a bit. Your ignorance is demonstrated by the science denier sources that you use. For example Douglas Axe is affiliated with the Discovery Institute. The DI was shown to be a lying organization in the Dover Trial. When you have to rely on dishonest sources that should begin to raise red flags for you. Answer in Genesis and almost every stie like it require their workers to swear that they will not follow the scientific method. How can you do that and call yourself a scientist?If as you say, that I don't understand what evidence is, what makes you so sure that you do?
That is because science is never about personality. It relies upon people following the scientific method and properly supporting their claims. Dawkins, like all of us is flawed. His scientific work still hold up. It is his nonscientific beliefs that are getting him in trouble.Richard Dawkins is quickly losing his "darling status" and his ideologies of the past when revisited (like himself) are not aging well: The Dangerous Delusions of Richard Dawkins.