metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
The Gospels say they relate as its belief and works that may lead to salvation.That is the placing of works in a heap and judging our works… not judging our salvation.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The Gospels say they relate as its belief and works that may lead to salvation.That is the placing of works in a heap and judging our works… not judging our salvation.
Which brings us back to the Law which no man will be justified by them for, as Habakkuk said, “The just shall live by his faith”, and again Isaiah, “all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags”.The Gospels say they relate as its belief and works that may lead to salvation.
Which brings us back to the Law which no man will be justified by them for, as Habakkuk said, “The just shall live by his faith”, and again Isaiah, “all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags”.
Faith will have works but works cannot produce faith.
Then I'd say your argument was with the translators rather than with me.No… I think it is just you interpreting it in context of your belief system. I come to a completely different understanding.
I agree! My point is simply that salvation is the horse which comes by faith. The cart attached to the horse should be filled with works that will be judged at the end of time.Yes, but overly emphasizing faith at the expense of "good works" is dangerous as even Gandhi noted. Paul cites this as "cymbals clashing" and states of faith, hope, and love, the latter is most important. .
Then I'd say your argument was with the translators rather than with me.
As for my 'belief system', I have no desire for God to be any particular thing. I simply point out that the Tanakh has God declaring [him]self to he a liar and dealer in lies, and the creator of evil ─ I set out the quotes.
My point is simply that salvation is the horse which comes by faith.
It sounds like we are saying the same thing.
Death for Adam and Eve was only if they broke God's law - Gen. 2:17Death has a purpose. It makes renewal possible. It makes evolution possible.
Perhaps you can quote me some part of the Tanakh that says so.
Meanwhile as I pointed out, what the traders were doing was NOT illegal.
AND if there was fault, that fault lay with the priests who administered the Temple, and NOT the traders.
AND it was pointless of Jesus to attack the traders for that reason.0
Irrelevant. In all four cases IF there was fault, it was the fault of the Temple administration and NOT the traders.
I like your ^ above ^ illustrationsI agree! My point is simply that salvation is the horse which comes by faith. The cart attached to the horse should be filled with works that will be judged at the end of time.
If you have a boatload of works with no love (no God) - it is a clashing of symbols and probably will involve pride on how good one has performed.....
Not so. The threat was not that they would die, but that they would die the same day they ate the fruit:Death for Adam and Eve was only if they broke God's law - Gen. 2:17
No, that's not what it says. But even if it did, it doesn't alter the point that the money changers were lawfully trading and if Jesus didn't like that he couldn't change things by criminally assaulting the money-changers ─ his argument was with the administration, though it appears he wasn't smart enough to work this out.Yes, yes, yes it was the fault of the corrupted priesthood/administration more so than the greedy traders
The Law allowed people to spend money - Deut. 14:24-26 - but the money changers were cheating - John 2:16 ; Mark 3:5
Yes, MANY call Jesus as Lord but don't actually mean it -> Matthew 7:21-23In my mind I made the distinction of those who when they said “Lord” actually meant it.
Yes. It is to me a true statement that Jesus said at Matthew 7:21-23.Yes, MANY call Jesus as Lord but don't actually mean it -> Matthew 7:21-23