1robin
Christian/Baptist
It won't help but what the heck.You need to quote verse of Bible to support your claim "any man who claims to be without sin is a liar"
English Standard Version (©2001)
If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
New Living Translation (©2007)
If we claim we have not sinned, we are calling God a liar and showing that his word has no place in our hearts.
Nope, your instructed to claim this and when the Bible proves you wrong time after time you are forced to reinterpret scriptures in ways that have absolutely no justification. As the two verses I posted say. If anyone (including prophets) says they are not sinful they are liars. As the second implies anyone claiming that men were perfect makes God a liar. Now I have to add that making God into a liar is another thing your religion forces you to do. That is a long sad list.It does not include the Bible. Read the stories about Moses and Aaron who the rebuke was addressed to them, eventhough it was people who were transgressors.
The bible says, Noah and Job were sinless and perfect men who walked with God in all generations. It rejects your claim. As I gave you example, these Prophest are expression of their people, and Bible uses them to address the rebukes. The story of Noah getting drunk, likewise is an expression of the sin of His own people.
That is even worse. I quoted you Baha'i scriptures, not Quran.
There is not a single example of this.Except I have shown you many times how their interpretations are wrong, and you have faild to prove my interpretations to be wrong.
I guess if the Bible, theologians, textual critics, and commentators do not count then maybe not. I have never encountered a case of cognative dissonance this extreme. It is truly astounding.You only make claimes with no proofs. You basically claim, my interpretations are not correct because you say so. How false! then why are we discussing then?
I have quoted verses that specifically say they sinned. This is unbelievable. Up is down and cold is hot. What a tactic.What's the point?
So far you have failed to prove any sin or error about any Messengers including Muhammad.
Nope I accept them because they have access to vastly more data and have spent their life dedicated to the effort of arriving at truth. However it is only necessary to read the bible to know you are in left field. One of my favorites has even held and read in it's language every known extant manuscript of the bible.You think they are qualified because they agree with you think is ture. That's all. When it comes to discussions you cannot prove any of your points.
How do you know you just made that up. The issue as it applies to other religions has not been discussed by me. Imaginary claims I have never made are poor straw men. It is not possible to even concieve of a bias so strong as to force someone to claim what you have. If it required the rejection and reinterpretation of every fact ever known to maintain your religion it would be done. It is really quite remarkable.Ok, but, if you see the same things in another religion you take their fault, and do not accept "It was not practicle to stop then"
Basically, I am trying to show how biased you are.