• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Maga Movement is just as racist as ever.

McBell

Unbound
I don't want to convince you.
I couldn't care less.
Yet here you are peddling snake oil...

I have been seeing the most horrific anomalies on that crime scene for the last 3 days.
really?
"horrific anomalies"?
Like what?

It's Dallas 1963, 2.0
So you do not know much of anything about the JFK assassination either...
Gotcha.

I respect your opinion. But I expect you to respect mine.
Respect is earned.
So stop acting like you are a part of some privileged elitist club.
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
Is that happening in this case? What evidence exists that the security was compromised because of diversity in the Secret Service?
I never said it was.
But not for applicants. So, it's not a matter of preselection:

"The APAT is a pre-employment physical fitness test developed to evaluate an applicant’s ability to perform the physical tasks required on the job by measuring muscular and dynamic strength, endurance, flexibility, aerobic capacity and other factors related to physical aptitude. The APAT is scored on a point-based system. Each test component is scored on a scale from 0 to 8 points. An applicant must achieve a minimum cumulative score of 20 points with no zeros to pass the APAT. APAT standards are not specific to age and/or gender identity."


The fitness standards are only slightly different and also based on age:

But it is an ongoing evaluation.
What is it about the slightly different fitness standards in the Secret Service that would prevent someone from doing the job? Do the lowered fitness standards for females and age suggest those fitness standards prevent them from performing their required duties?
I don't know but why would there be different fitness standards? Do males do different jobs than females in the secret service? If the female standards are sufficient then why not have those be the standards?
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
Is that happening in this case? What evidence exists that the security was compromised because of diversity in the Secret Service?
I never said it was.
But not for applicants. So, it's not a matter of preselection:

"The APAT is a pre-employment physical fitness test developed to evaluate an applicant’s ability to perform the physical tasks required on the job by measuring muscular and dynamic strength, endurance, flexibility, aerobic capacity and other factors related to physical aptitude. The APAT is scored on a point-based system. Each test component is scored on a scale from 0 to 8 points. An applicant must achieve a minimum cumulative score of 20 points with no zeros to pass the APAT. APAT standards are not specific to age and/or gender identity."


The fitness standards are only slightly different and also based on age:

But it is an ongoing evaluation.
What is it about the slightly different fitness standards in the Secret Service that would prevent someone from doing the job? Do the lowered fitness standards for females and age suggest those fitness standards prevent them from performing their required duties?
I don't know but why would there be different fitness standards? Do males do different jobs than females in the secret service? If the female standards are sufficient then why not have those be the standards?
 

McBell

Unbound
I prefer not to tell them to you, dear.
With all due respect, I don't want to end up like Alice... ;)

I suspect it is more likely you realize you bit off more than you can chew are are now running tail tucked in hopes no will further call out your nonsense.

Prove me wrong.
I double dog dare you.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
I suspect it is more likely you realize you bit off more than you can chew are are now running tail tucked in hopes no will further call out your nonsense.
Absolutely not.
It's about I provide some details and the next second you deny them, as the Cheshire Cat would do...
So it's like going around in circles...
With all due respect, of course. :)
 

McBell

Unbound
Absolutely not.
It's about I provide some details and the next second you deny them, as the Cheshire Cat would do...
So it's like going around in circles...
With all due respect, of course.
It is about you make a bold empty claim, when asked to support said bold empty claim you run off into left field with yet another bold empty claim, rinse and repeat until you you claim it is everyone else who is chasing their tail.

Since you have not revealed with your posts you understand what respect is, ***self edit*** {to save the mods some time....}
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
It is about you make a bold empty claim, when asked to support said bold empty claim you run off into left field with yet another bold empty claim, rinse and repeat until you you claim it is everyone else who is chasing their tail.

Since you have not revealed with your posts you understand what respect is, ***self edit*** {to save the mods some time....}
No, It's about I post a video where horrific anomalies are shown and you would probably say: I don't watch videos.
Or I post some article, and you would probably say it's from rightist media, and all rightist media tell lies.

Just one detail: many democrats admitted to the existence of these anomalies. Also because: I can promise you that those élites who planned all this are not from the left., It's elites who crave for a world war.
 

McBell

Unbound
No, It's about I post a video where horrific anomalies are shown and you would probably say: I don't watch videos.
Or I post some article, and you would probably say it's from rightist media, and all rightist media tell lies.

Just one detail: many democrats admitted to the existence of these anomalies. Also because: I can promise you that those élites who planned all this are not from the left., It's elites who crave for a world war.
Again a long drawn out list of excuses as to why you will not produce what you claim to have.
It is as though you do not actually have anything to produce.
Or is it you know what you have is inadequate?

Either way, your flat refusal to produce it is on you.
Not me.
Nor on anyone who hurt your feelings in the past.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Again a long drawn out list of excuses as to why you will not produce what you claim to have.
It is as though you do not actually have anything to produce.
Or is it you know what you have is inadequate?
Wanna bet?
Comment on this article, monsieur. Secret Service boss cites hazard of putting agent on 'sloped roof'
Either way, your flat refusal to produce it is on you.
Not me.
Nor on anyone who hurt your feelings in the past.
I like debating. But the debate should be an even debate. Au pair. ;)
 

McBell

Unbound

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
I am not so easily distracted.
If you are not going to support your claim, just say so.
No need to further destroy your credibility with more nonsense.
I just did. Posting an article about anomalies and secret services.
I am not claiming anything in particular. Just the existence of enormous anomalies.
 
Last edited:
Top