Sorry, no. It does.
Try again. That's funny.
It's the perfect demonstrate.
It demonstrates that you cannot have design without a designer. Nothing is created without a creator.
Mankind can only mimic what is possible to mimic. He calls himself a creator which technically he is not, because he cannot create anything from what is not already there. He mimics the already existing designer, and he copies the design already designed - in nature.
No one can dispute what is obvious to everyone. No one can demonstrate that anything can be designed without a designer, or come into existence without being created. Sure they can appeal to illogical arguments, but shutting one's eyes to reality won't make it go away.
Persons who want to believe contrary to what is evidently true fr which deniers have no excuse. What a terrible position to be in, especially for those who call themselves Christian and choose Scientism over faith in God. Romans 1:18-23
18 For God’s wrath is being revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who are suppressing the truth in an unrighteous way, 19 because what may be known about God is clearly evident among them, for God made it clear to them. 20 For his invisible qualities are clearly seen from the world’s creation onward, because they are perceived by the things made, even his eternal power and Godship, so that they are inexcusable.
21 For although they knew God, they did not glorify him as God nor did they thank him, but they became empty-headed in their reasonings and their senseless hearts became darkened. 22 Although claiming they were wise, they became foolish 23 and turned the glory of the incorruptible God into something like the image of corruptible man and birds and four-footed creatures and reptiles.
Actually people who claim to believe in God but yet are really hopping around on two opinions,
by 1. trying to mesh religious based science with their religion; 2 replace the Bible with religious based science, I think they had better wake up and open their eyes, and realize who has them by the scruff of the neck, or the throat. Revelation 12:9
It is in my view quite interesting the wording the apostle Paul used when he spoke of those who were
sleeping, and have their eyes shut.
Romans 11:7, 8
7 The rest
had their senses dulled,
8 just as it is written: “
God has given them a spirit of deep sleep, eyes that do not see and ears that do not hear, down to this very day.”
1 Thessalonians 5:6-9
6 So, then,
let us not sleep on as the rest do, but let us stay awake and keep our senses. 7 For those who sleep, sleep at night, and those who get drunk are drunk at night.
8 But as
for us who belong to the day, let us keep our senses and put on the breastplate of faith and love and the hope of salvation as a helmet 9 because God assigned us, not to wrath, but to the acquiring of salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ.
2 Timothy 2:25, 26
25 Perhaps God may give them repentance leading to an accurate knowledge of truth, 26 and they may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the Devil, seeing that they have been caught alive by him to do his will.
2 Timothy 4:3-5
3 For there will be a period of time when they will not put up with the wholesome teaching, but according to their own desires, they will surround themselves with teachers to have their ears tickled. 4 They will turn away from listening to the truth and give attention to false stories. 5 You, though, keep your senses in all things, endure hardship, do the work of an evangelizer, fully accomplish your ministry.
Wow! Wow. I always marvel at how accurate the Bible is - how it accurately describes events, and people's situations - especially today.
What a darkness people are willing to put themselves in, and why? Satisfying their fleshly cravings - They want to be free to smoke their cigarettes, engage is sexual immorality and illicit lusts... without being made to feel guilty, either by the Bible, or people who live by its standards. How sad and deplorable.
The even more sad part about it is that the
"wolves" that they allow to mislead them know full well - they know the truth. Romans 1:21 is no joke. They know there is a creator, but they mask the truth, to live their life as they please.
...and they dupe the masses into taking that
leap of imagination, with them - into the darkness.
A third respect in which our brains seem predisposed to resist Darwinism stems from our great success as creative designers. Our world is dominated by feats of engineering and works of art. We are entirely accustomed to the idea that complex elegance is an indicator of premeditated, Grafted design. This is probably the most powerful reason for the belief, held by the vast majority of people that have ever lived, in some kind of supernatural deity. It took a very large leap of the imagination for Darwin and Wallace to see that, contrary to all intuition, there is another way and, once you have understood it, a far more plausible way, for complex 'design' to arise out of primeval simplicity. A leap of the imagination so large that, to this day, many people seem still unwilling to make it. It is the main purpose of this book to help the reader to make this leap.
- Richard Dawkins "The Blind Watchmaker" Preface
The language Dawkins used is noteworthy - quite interesting.
...
predisposed to resist - not truth, not scientific fact - Darwinism.
It took a very large leap of the imagination for Darwin and Wallace to see ...A leap of the imagination so large that, to this day, many people seem still unwilling to make it.
Wow. A leap of what? How large?
It amuses me.
So take the leap. We've only got one life to live right? Curse God and die.
The way I am seeing it, the
ultimatum is in our face, plain as day. It's not a case of "hidden in plain sight". This is the final episode. The final chapter is about to close.
I've argued that we are 100 percent now dependent on science for survival of our species. In part, science of today has to overcome the scientific breakthroughs of previous years because we've advanced internal combustion engines, because we're so good at burning carbon that we take out of the ground, we did it blindly without any consequences of, that it might totally affect the future of the planet. - Craig Venter
Psalm 118:8, 9
8 It is better to take refuge in Jehovah Than to trust in humans.
9 It is better to take refuge in Jehovah Than to trust in princes.
Psalm 146:3, 4
3 Do not put your trust in princes Nor in a son of man, who cannot bring salvation.
4 His spirit goes out, he returns to the ground; On that very day his thoughts perish.
Psalm 37:3-6; Psalm 40:4, 5; Psalm 62:8, 9;
Apparently, the stakes are high, and we have to put in the whole stack. There is no holding back now. It's game over.
Can Science Answer?
Where did the information originate?
CRAIG VENTER: One of the exciting elements that people who are interested in the digital world here may find is
we can use the genetic code to watermark chromosomes. You can use it in a secret code, or you can - basically what we're using is the three-letter triplet code that codes for amino acids. There's 20 amino acids, and they use single letters to denote those. Using the triplet code, we can write words, sentences, we can say, "This genome was made by Richard Dawkins on this date in 2008." A key hallmark of man-made species, manmade chromosomes, is that they will be very much denoted that way.
RICHARD DAWKINS: What has happened is that
genetics has become a branch of information technology. It is pure information. It's digital information. It's precisely the kind of information that can be translated digit for digit, byte for byte, into any other kind of information and then translated back again. This is a major revolution. I suppose it's probably "the" major revolution in the whole history of our understanding of ourselves.
It's something would have boggled the mind of Darwin, and Darwin would have loved it, I'm absolutely sure.
Not man-made. Not a product of human intellect. Mindless or Of a mind - an intelligence?
Where did instinct, and intelligence originate?
Where did life originate?
What is the purpose of life - why are we here? Where are we going - is there life after death?
In my view, intelligent design answers these questions, provided we connect to its source.
To deny intelligent design is the same as a gaps argument - "I don't see a designer, therefore selection (natural selection) did it."