ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
No, I want to understand. Are you going to meet me in the middle on good faith?You want to proselytize.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No, I want to understand. Are you going to meet me in the middle on good faith?You want to proselytize.
No, I want to understand. Are you going to meet me in the middle on good faith?
Your position on evolution and why you reject it.To help you understand what, forked tongue?
Your position on evolution and why you reject it.
I don't know why you're being so defensive. I'm being as polite as I can be.
Again, specifics if you can. What part of evolution do you find "stupid" and why?Very well. I will be as polite as I can be. I reject evolution because it's stupid.
Again, specifics if you can. What part of evolution do you find "stupid" and why?
Living things reproduce with variation.All of it. Everything about it. Name something and I will tell you how stupid it is.
Living things reproduce with variation.
But it's not a red herring, it's part of evolutionary theory.Stupid. Who doesn't know that? Brown hair, blond hair, black hair, no hair, red hairing.
But it's not a red herring, it's part of evolutionary theory.
I'm not really sure what to say to you at this point. You're just doing the same things over and over.....making religiously-based empty assertions and declaring that you're doing good science.Yes, seriously. Explain.
I dont think your understanding what im saying. And i dont know if i can help you understand either.
No, thats not what i have done. Ive done what science does. I dont know why you cant see that. This is like trying to drscribe a tree to a blind person. They cant see it.
Do you need to do a test in order to see design and order? No, ya dont. Vut, even those who have, still, theres design and order.
Logic, philosophy. And philosophy is not the same as religion. There different.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vKiaH-Xy9tk&ved=2ahUKEwjosbuol9_fAhWBm4MKHe-XA_IQjjgwA3oECAQQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1rFbeJuz5XQywuZ7OhDaMk
Theres one source for now.
You do understand the difference between being shown and actually seeing it, dont you?
Let me ask you, whats the difference between religion and philosophy?
No, i dont THINK i did, i KNOW i presented a evidence-base scientific case for ID.
Anyone who already agrees with ID, will see the evidence i presented. Anyone elsr, like you, will not see it.
There has to be a prime reality.
A leprechaun is better then "nothing" creating it all. Its also better then infinite regression, which make the universes events take forever to happen, which means theyed never happen.
But hey. A leprechaun is confined to space, time and matter. The God i defined is not. Thats the difference.
If God created it, which the evidence is there by design, then God is tge energy, logically.
Its not religion. People who are religioys can adhere to it. But its not religion.
It should be obvious by now that he doesn't want to discuss evolutionary biology, he just wants to mock.Your position on evolution and why you reject it.
I don't know why you're being so defensive. I'm being as polite as I can be.
Please, when you refuse to learn from others you cannot call them "my teacher". You tried to blame the teachers for your lack of understanding. It is becoming ever more clear that is not the case.So? Who cares? It's redundant, or as my great science teacher, @Subduction Zone would say, Occam's Razor.
Please, when you refuse to learn from others you cannot call them "my teacher". You tried to blame the teachers for your lack of understanding. It is becoming ever more clear that is not the case.
I'm not really sure what to say to you at this point. You're just doing the same things over and over.....making religiously-based empty assertions and declaring that you're doing good science.
All I can tell you is that if you truly think what you've done here constitutes science, you are sorely mistaken.
If you actually tried to learn I would still try to help you.Oh, now, you're just being modest.
If you actually tried to learn I would still try to help you.
You can't help me, sir. To me it all seems ridiculous. You can't pound it into my head and I can't give you what you want. If a simple question bends you out of shape it's just a matter of me accepting it. You can say that isn't the proper question asked in the proper way because I'm ignorant . . . but c'mon. You aren't stupid. You know it's just a matter of me accepting it.
I can't do that because it doesn't make sense to me. The premise is set. Everything from there is "evidence" of that faulty premise. But it isn't. It's just nonsense.
You still do not get it. It is based on what actually exists around us all. When I watch your actions to discover who you are, why would I look at books and beliefs about you when I have the Real Thing in front of my nose???? It seems what I have been saying to you is beyond you. It's going to take much work for you to find understanding.
What should you learn? You should be able to Discover the Truth, find Understanding and Learn what it's all about.
Clearly, you are not ready. There are other things you would rather hold onto. That's ok too. In time, what I have said will become more important to you. Until then, as I see it, there are other things you need to work out first.
Why not refute the point of the tenth grader then?