Sheldon
Veteran Member
If only you could understand that all beliefs are real.
I believe that is wrong, if that helps.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If only you could understand that all beliefs are real.
You are not describing an "effect caused by God." You are describing an effect caused by something some humans believe. Humans have believed that other humans were witches, and killed them for it. Their deaths were not caused by witchcraft or magic, but by mistaken beliefs.
I believe that is wrong, if that helps.
Projection and irrational ad hominem, dear oh dear, and I don't believe I have ever tried to insist anyone sees reality as I do. In stark contrast to your posts of course, insisting atheists must hold a belief, even after they explain they don't. then angrily throwing around false accusation of duplicity. Yes you're struggle to encompass the points of views of others has been impressive.He thinks he IS the objective reverent. His reality IS reality, in Sheldonworld.
Rigid thinking doesn't allow for understanding or learning.Projection and irrational ad hominem, dear oh dear, and I don't believe I have ever tried to insist anyone sees reality as I do. In stark contrast to your posts of course, insisting atheists must hold a belief, even after they explain they don't. then angrily throwing around false accusation of duplicity. Yes you're struggle to encompass the points of views of others has been impressive.
Projection and irrational ad hominem, dear oh dear, and I don't believe I have ever tried to insist anyone sees reality as I do. In stark contrast to your posts of course, insisting atheists must hold a belief, even after they explain they don't. then angrily throwing around false accusation of duplicity. Yes you're struggle to encompass the points of views of others has been impressive.
No atheists do, or they would be agnostics, not atheists.
This is what I mean by atheists lying.
So many of them are lying, now, that it's becoming rare to find one that isn't. If you are spouting that rationale that you are an atheist because you have no evidence of gods existing, then you are not agnostic.
If you really do accept that you don't and can't know that gods exist or not, because you can't even determine what "evidence" for gods existing would even look like, then you aren't an atheist. You are agnostic.
You can be both, but not based on an expectation of "evidence", or on it's lack. To claim both, then, is to lie.
Theism is the philosophical inquest regarding a belief in the existence of gods. Agnosticism is the belief that we humans can't know if or how gods exist. Atheism is the counter-proposition to the theist belief/proposition: that gods don't exist.You know, one gets tired of being a liar so often. Let us be a little clear, here: theism means belief in (not knowledge of) a god or gods. Atheism simply means lacking that knowledge.
Then why are you calling yourself an atheist? You say that you have no position on the existence or non-existence of gods. Then why lie and claim you are an atheist? Or if you really do choose to believe gods don't exist, then why lie and claim you have no position on the question? If you don't know, and don't believe either way, why not just say so?Evangelicalhumanist said:As an atheist, I have repeatedly said I do not KNOW that there is no god, but rather that I do not believe there is or are not.
Actually, we find an enormous effect resulting from our choosing to believe that gods exist. Both positive and negative. I'm sure you, yourself, have whined about it many times. The belief is in many ways far more crucial and effecting than the thing being believed in. You keep missing the point of theism by focusing on a very narrow concept of what does or doesn't exist. And you keep overlooking the enormous effect and potential of trusting in the idea of gods existing.
Theism is the philosophical inquest regarding a belief in the existence of gods. Agnosticism is the belief that we humans can't know if or how gods exist. Atheism is the counter-proposition to the theist belief/proposition: that gods don't exist.
But I feel certain you will ignore this clarification because it doesn't serve your 'feel good' bias. Please prove me wrong!
Then why are you calling yourself an atheist? You say that you have no position on the existence or non-existence of gods. Then why lie and claim you are an atheist? Or if you really do choose to believe gods don't exist, then why lie and claim you have no position on the question? If you don't know, and don't believe either way, why not just say so?
Why all the deliberate obfuscation? Or are you really this profoundly confused?
People find many different things to lend meaning to their lives, no one is denying that, but that doesn't mean that what they imagine has created that meaning is necessarily real or extant. You keep making this accusation that atheists don't understand your beliefs, but the fact is I have over many years seen identical claims from innumerable theists for different deities and religions. I cannot believe them all, have not experienced what they claim to have, and since none can offer any objective difference between their beliefs and all the others, the only option I can rationally take is to withhold belief, and remain agnostic about their claims when those claims are unfalsifiable.
Unfortunately this seems to make you very angry, though is it is not clear why? According to your rationale you have got the winning lottery numbers, and I don't believe you, why you would even care isn't clear?
Because the religious don't shut up about it, and keep insisting on blathering on about their beliefs all over the place -- including in devising the laws in which the whole of the public must operate. It wasn't all that long ago where I live that nobody could shop on Sunday (never mind that not everybody shares that Sabbath), and all tables in bars had to be clear of intoxicating drinks by midnight sharp on Saturday night. Oh, and I was a criminal for loving who I did. Those were the devices of the religious, foist upon me.
People are paid to work Sundays.It wasn’t that long ago where I live - well, not much more than 40 years - when you couldn’t buy anything on a Sunday. And unless you worked for the emergency services, or were clergy, everyone had the day off. Families could be together, commerce and the heartbreaking struggle to make money stopped for a day; and a city the size of London stopped and breathed once a week, every week.
Now, commerce carries on round the clock, seven days a week, it never stops. People are bullied into working Sundays. My partner works in a wine shop and hardly ever gets a Sunday off. I really don’t see this particular trend, from God to Mammon, as any sort of progress.
They're arbitrary definitions you have made up, so accusing others of bias is again thick with irony. Agnosticism is the belief that nothing is known or can be known, about the nature or existence of god. Theism is belief in the existence of a god or gods, specifically of a creator who intervenes in the universe. Atheism is the lack or absence of that belief.Theism is the philosophical inquest regarding a belief in the existence of gods. Agnosticism is the belief that we humans can't know if or how gods exist. Atheism is the counter-proposition to the theist belief/proposition: that gods don't exist.
But I feel certain you will ignore this clarification because it doesn't serve your 'feel good' bias. Please prove me wrong!
Then why are you calling yourself an atheist? You say that you have no position on the existence or non-existence of gods.
why lie and claim you are an atheist?
Or if you really do choose to believe gods don't exist, then why lie and claim you have no position on the question? If you don't know, and don't believe either way, why not just say so?
Why all the deliberate obfuscation? Or are you really this profoundly confused?
Okay, let's "believe" that God exists. Fine, now let's see what effect God has on the world -- and sure enough, what do we find? Nothing.
Okay, so God exists, but to no purpose whatsoever. Whoopee!
People are paid to work Sundays.
Anyone who doesn't like it can refuse or quit.
This is better than government telling us when
we can shop & work....& when we can't (IMO).
You're more comfortable with them controlling
us for our own good than I am.
Rather authoritarian ones it seems.I have other values.
It wasn’t that long ago where I live - well, not much more than 40 years - when you couldn’t buy anything on a Sunday. And unless you worked for the emergency services, or were clergy, everyone had the day off. Families could be together, commerce and the heartbreaking struggle to make money stopped for a day; and a city the size of London stopped and breathed once a week, every week.
Now, commerce carries on round the clock, seven days a week, it never stops. People are bullied into working Sundays. My partner works in a wine shop and hardly ever gets a Sunday off. I really don’t see this particular trend, from God to Mammon, as any sort of progress.
I'm inclined to agree, and I have worked plenty of Sundays, and been paid pretty well for it. I have also taken many off and enjoyed myself. I wouldn't work for anyone who insisted I had to work every Sunday, and in London Jobs are a lot easier to come by than other parts of the UK.People are paid to work Sundays.
Anyone who doesn't like it can refuse or quit.
This is better than government telling us when
we can shop & work....& when we can't (IMO).
You're more comfortable with them controlling
us for our own good than I am.
Rather authoritarian ones it seems.
I prefer more anarchy...of a libertarian flavor.
I didn't know you're a Limey.Well no one has to work Sundays, there are plenty of jobs where they would be optional. Especially in a city like London..
I'm inclined to agree, and I have worked plenty of Sundays, and been paid pretty well for it. I have also taken many off and enjoyed myself. I wouldn't work for anyone who insisted I had to work every Sunday, and in London Jobs are a lot easier to come by than other parts of the UK.